madras

That was decided when they stood full-square behind that nazi-saluting fascist who saved their skins and beat the mags. Then everyone forgot because they are so utterly insignificant on a national level. Something tells me this might be different though. Aye the press smell blood here like For what though? Byrne to get the sack? Then what? I mean, I agree. But I can't figure out their agenda If Byrne knew, Short knew.

that's exactly what I logged in to post.

When can RTG discuss it ?

Ready To Groon see it as Twelve Angry Mags.

because there isnt anything Wouldn't be so sure. It seems like the reporting on certain aspects of the incidents that Johnson pleaded to not guilty on were rather scant, as if more was said in the courtroom than was released in the media.

What would Quentin Crisp know anyway ?

The club needs to make a statement when the trial ends. If it turns out they did know, then someone should be sacked. What if it turns out Short knew aswell ?

Trying to paint a picture of her as a liar. Don't know how far that line will go with Johnson actually pleading guilty.

tattoos take time.

Mackems, Citeh, Liverpool, Everton, Bolton, Darlo, Celtic, Rangers, Inter Milan, Juventus. Not so much the clubs themselves as their fans particularly twatful.

Of course she didn't. And anyone who tries to imply she did are retards. Said all along they had to have known what had actually happened and lo and behold they did. Absolutely f***ing disgusting. tbf it looked at first like he'd just denied everything and the club believed it. Different picture now.

She has to go after this, surely? Can't help but feel that the PFA are in the wrong here as well. Of course, it's their job to be on the players side, but if they knew as much as Sunderland did and were still pressuring Sunderland to let him play, that doesn't sit right with me. It has to go all the way to the top. Can't see Short not asking what was going on.

Quoted so you can't deny you posted that.

I just think we'd be better off with humans that are qualified and experienced in making reasoned interpretations determining the most serious criminal cases, rather than randoms off the street. That'll be RTG's excuse then, "It was just a jury of Humans and they could be wrong, nee one reelly knaas wot happened marra" Oh and for what it's worth the educated classes are just as likely to have the wool pulled over their eyes as the lower classes.

I just think we'd be better off with humans that are qualified and experienced in making reasoned interpretations determining the most serious criminal cases, rather than randoms off the street. That'll be RTG's excuse then, "It was just a jury of Humans and they could be wrong, nee one reelly knaas wot happened marra"

Good analogy, some instead of lots would've been better but A-

You can rightly sack someone, provided you have genuine belief (in this case, an admission) that they have committed a serious offence and it impacts the company (serious damage to reputation). Any two-bit lawyer knows this, and the club would have been informed of this fact. The fact that the let him play, let alone sack him, shows that they would rather play a known child sex offender than risk relegation. This is absolutely wrong, and the club should be heavily fined. When other fans (rightly) lay into the mackems with paedo chants, they will not have a leg to stand on. By continuing to support the club, the are supporting an organisation that has knowingly harboured a paedophile. They really are a disgusting club. Not to mention a sizeable minority of their fans chanting things that attempted to made a joke of the situation. Good on some of their fans who stood up and said it was disgraceful.

See what happens if it's proven that they knew about it and still played him.

It comes down to when he told the club that he was guilty of the charges he pleaded guilty to. If they continued to play him after that they deserve all the stick they get.

Possibly why she done it.

When the case is actually finished, what reason will RTG use to still block any threads about it ?

SAFC..... She's A Fucking Child.

If this is true I wonder if it means we were looking at Mbemba and Taylor even before Colo's injury ?

better performance, scrappy defeat, loads of pressure on to the next two home games.

Can't remember anyone singing "he assaults who he wants" if thats what you mean.