madras

and? most seem to see it as we do.

just had a quick look about to make sure I wasn't looking at this through black and white geps. http://www.owlstalk.co.uk/forums/index.php/topic/191748-wigan-newcastle/ http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=304206.0 http://www.redcafe.net/f7/callum-mcmanaman-367960/

tbf the vast majority of other clubs fans are doing likewise....not the mackems not surprisigly.

or more so, if it had been on gerrard or lampard.

quite pleased he's been charged, gives him a chance to tell them what a bunch of incompetent fuckwits they are.

I haven't been this distraught since learning that victoria wood and the great soprendo had split up.

i've just done it and had us 10th with 43pts (wins v fulham and mackems, draws at QPR, WBA and west ham, home to arsenal), reading bottom, then sunderland (no wins, only 2 draws to the end of the season) and wigan (on goal difference from QPR)

to save me having to go through all 46 pages, whats "the dilsh" about ?

could be in honour of lionel blair.

i'd have no problem with our players getting sued if they done something like that (especially in guthries case as it wasn't even a tackle, that was ABH). however it's going to be difficuilt to get a court to decide on intent etc. It really isn't. You don't actually have to prove intent per se for any criminal offence/negligence action against the person. but if you couldn't prove intent then it opens up prosecutions for injuries where there was no intent, do we want to go down that route ? Yes. If serious injury can be reasonably foreseen by the offending player the tackle shouldn't be made. and thats what would be very difficuilt to prove in court imo.

i'd have no problem with our players getting sued if they done something like that (especially in guthries case as it wasn't even a tackle, that was ABH). however it's going to be difficuilt to get a court to decide on intent etc. It really isn't. You don't actually have to prove intent per se for any criminal offence/negligence action against the person. but if you couldn't prove intent then it opens up prosecutions for injuries where there was no intent, do we want to go down that route ?

it doesn't matter if it's 50/50 or not if you don't even attempt to play the ball.

i'd have no problem with our players getting sued if they done something like that (especially in guthries case as it wasn't even a tackle, that was ABH). however it's going to be difficuilt to get a court to decide on intent etc. We settled out of court with Everton over the Nolan tackle. did we ? never knew that. still think it would be difficuilt on most occasions.

rather he'd have left that till the weekend. i can see him playing both games for france now.

why ? I played football for nearly 30yrs and never once felt the need to tackle like that.

i'd have no problem with our players getting sued if they done something like that (especially in guthries case as it wasn't even a tackle, that was ABH). however it's going to be difficuilt to get a court to decide on intent etc.

similar to yesterdays and they scored from it aswell. rarely been so angry watching a match.

was horrible but not in the same way, no intent.

it's youtubeable. agree about burridge mind. sat behind him on a train from edinburgh and hte entire carriage knew who he was, where he was going etc, loud, arrogant prick.

handy for me as i don't need to get the saturday off. dislike the early KO though.

paul hardyman on john burridge.

who we got at the weekend like ?

wasn't a tackle though, just got pissed off and kicked him.

barton on etuhu.

i think the opposite, even if he did see it he'll say he didn't (using the tele footage that there was a player in the way) to get him off the hook.