Jump to content

madras

Member
  • Posts

    76,717
  • Joined

Everything posted by madras

  1. Maybe Hopkinson was seen as worth waiting for and he's had to undergo so sort of notice period ?
  2. What if his valuations are wrong ? Or hes too invested in certain players so wont move on to other options ? Or has a very small pool that he'll pick from? All allegations laid at us so far with some evidence l.
  3. Could be argued if Isak is injured thats why hes staying. Learn from mistakes and all that.
  4. And if his feelings translate on the pitch and training ground hes stays the full 3.
  5. And clubs spending more than they bring in have to provide guarantees that the debts wouldnt be on the club.
  6. Hopefully the profile of Hopkinson (is that him, the former Real Madrid fella ?) makes them think, "Here, just get on with it, We'll leave you to it"
  7. Might come sooner than you think kidda.
  8. There's running and there's running. Botman and Hall were both running months before they were allowed near a match practise. Edit Totally agree on the last bit.
  9. "Keep things amicable " ? Do they still lose their cut of the fee (10% wasn't it ?) if they request a transfer ? Amicable my fat sweaty arse !
  10. They are adhered to when they protect the player, less so when they protect the club.
  11. Would be if it wasn't so obviously against what the club wanted. I think they (the club management) wouldn't have been against selling a Gordon on and using that extra cash but not Isak.
  12. And can pay well over the odds on fees and wages. Edit.....although I'm thinking the original post was tongue in cheek.
  13. Yeah because if you want 4x50mill players but only have 150mill you get them if you act quick.
  14. Unless his contract has a clause which says if he flops we can cut his wage so it works both ways then yeah, I can be angry with him.
×
×
  • Create New...