Jump to content

Dinho lad

Member
  • Posts

    26,014
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dinho lad

  1. Once again I kept a close eye on Carrick. And once again I ask myself this- what's so special about him? Ok so we know that he has great passing range and good positioning. But what else does he offer? Overrated.
  2. http://www.tribalfootball.com/article.php?id=27955
  3. Dinho lad

    Brazil v Portugal

    probably broke a nail tbh...
  4. so has he signed for the smogs or not?
  5. Dinho lad

    Dyer

    He's gonna get injured tomorrow night, isn't he?
  6. the cameras zooming in on the player's arse when they go down.
  7. Dinho lad

    How good were

    Exactly this man has made a proffesional, a good one at that, career out of being a good f****** passer. He has little else except a decent right foot. Not worth his salt in the current team.
  8. errr...it's still the same, no?
  9. Dinho lad

    Worst Prem XI

    He's got good control and decent pace, though.
  10. Dinho lad

    Worst Prem XI

    Pulled off some top class saves yesterday! Earned us the points, tbh, when we were conspiring to throw them away. He looked dodgy at your place, mind. Talking of yesterday ..... John Carew. What a player that boy is. we don't need him according to Roeder.
  11. Our "scouts" only seem to go to work when we need an opposition team scouted. Pile of crap.
  12. I think Roeder dosen't know what he is. He was fine for us playing as DM last season.
  13. Dinho lad

    Petr Cech

    I was beginning to think Mourinho was exaggerating his injury a while ago.
  14. I wonder if NE5 still rates him.
  15. LAUGH.GIF! I notice you're certain that we should sign Gooch and you're saying that he isn't a risk. What you going to do if your new messiah turns out to be a naughty little boy? Undoubtedly you'll slate him as well. FICKLE.GIF!! Errr....I meant he's not a risk by playing him. Didn't say one thing about signing him, so I don't know where you got that claim from. This means what then? I don't think he counts as a risk. Everyone else was talking about signing him in that thread, weren't you? The thread was about Gooch's performance. Here's the full quote anyway. They were talking about his performance as much as about buying him. I certainly meant he's not a risk in terms of playing him. Because I'm sure he's better than what we've got already.
  16. LAUGH.GIF! I notice you're certain that we should sign Gooch and you're saying that he isn't a risk. What you going to do if your new messiah turns out to be a naughty little boy? Undoubtedly you'll slate him as well. FICKLE.GIF!! Errr....I meant he's not a risk by playing him. Didn't say one thing about signing him, so I don't know where you got that claim from.
  17. vavavooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom!
  18. Reminded me of the tussles he used to have with Wor Nikos. Ahhh good old days.
×
×
  • Create New...