The College Dropout

If we could spend and build a squad for it I would love it. Atm we would struggle to put out a proper second string team. The additional games would kill our league form. I would love to win it. It’s just that it would ruin the league form imo.

It's only the Conference League mind. For a club tight against FFP and a shallow squad - it's more trouble than it's worth IMO. If we plan to sign a bunch of (cheapish) kids then it's fine. Europa League without CL dropouts is immensely winnable and a route to CL so that's great.

My point is - all the bigger London clubs have an advantage because of the tremendous depth of talent. Take the areas i've highlighted, take the current ability of the top 25 players, you could name 50 Londoners (and close) of equal ability or better. I don't know how but there's a compounding effect happening in youth football in London - I think it's the competition and density. The North-East and Scotland aren't producing nearly as much quality. Talent to selling fee ratio for Chelsea is actually bad. They sold Livramento for £5m and Hall for £30m. Guehi played a season and a half in the Championship, £20m seemed a lot at the time but he's easily worth 2.5x now. The players they sell for bigger fees (Maatsen, Gallagher, Mount etc.) all played regular CL football. Compared to London, Greater Manchester, midlands - the NE currently seems to produce far less quality players and it's a disadvantage for us. London is arguably the best city in Europe for producing talent, that's an advantage for 3 of the top 6, it has to be.- It's something i'm hoping PIF's investment can help with as investment might be an issue.

No you can just look at the latest accounts and summaries by the looks of Kieran Maguire. Man City, Spurs, Brighton, Brentford and to a lesser degree Liverpool, have loads of FFP/PSR headroom. Man City's numbers are cooked to bits.

Arsenal are literally selling academy players - actually from London - for £20-30m every year Just the Bukayo Saka (worth 100m imo), Emile Smith-Rowe (30m), Reiss Nelson, Joe Willock (30m), Eddie Nketiah (25m), Balogun (30m) with Nwaneri and Lewis-Skelly up next. All players raised in London. Spurs have a relatively weak academy given their size and catchment area - Fulham's is better. But even Spurs have produced Harry Kane, Walker-Peters and Madueke spent the bulk of his development at Spurs & Palace. Fulham have Fabio Carvalho, Harvey Elliott, Djed Spence, Sessegnon, Matt O'Riley. I liked Spence at Forest and thought he played well against us. Always liked Fabio Carvalho too. Man City have a great academy but they are taking players from around the world and especially London (Tosin, Sancho are London boys). Chelsea can focus on London and the surrounding suburbs. Chelsea are sometimes victims themselves of losing academy players (sometimes by choice) - Olise, Rice and Musiala spent the majority of their academy days at Chelsea - lads raised in South/West London.

Man City have a lot of PSR headspace. Spurs ars sweeping up teenage wonderkids like nobody's business for big money. 5 transfers for players 21 or under in the summer for big money - 40m, 30m, 15m, 10m and a cheapy all for boys. Gray, Odobert & Bergvall look like real talents. It's a season or two too early for them.

The Kulu elbow was crazy and he definitely intended to smash AG. He's going to do something else. The elbow was mad.

Genuinely one of the best academies in the world. And one of the best catchment areas too. What other cities have the quality and depth of London in world football? A London active 25 squad would be tops.

He's fine where he is but he's so good under pressure, you do wonder if he can play at CM/DM. That's the thing with the wonderful modern fullback. As good as they are - they usually lack the footballing ability to play CM. Particularly facing their own goal or under pressure. And then the appreciation of space. We've seen TAA struggle with that when inverting or playing CM where i've seen James take to it like a duck to water - a player i've always thought was a more complete footballer. Hall is not as devastating as either going forward but behind James he's one of the most complete footballers i've seen in the PL.

Fuck FFP man. We still have massive issues and it looks like we need to sell to reinvest (unless you know what). Even if we qualify for the CL, we have the same problem. We probably need to spend £150-200m on the existing squad to be able to compete in the CL and league at the same time. That seems impossible to do (unless you know what). Villa are struggling because they don't have the squad.

This is relatively small for the big 6. It impacts clubs like us more as a overall %. Our revenues are 300mish. Man U's is 800mish no? The competition money has a much bigger impact for us or Villa than it does Man U. Leicester are going to get a PL points deduction, get relegated, get a Championship points deduction. Spend the next 5 years trying to get in and stay in the PL and lose most of the brand value they accumulated by winning the PL & FA Cup. And it's just because of FFP - their Owners are happy to finance Leicester. The game would never let this happen to a Cartel club.

Balding but handsome. Suit is too tight, too many crinkles. Black brogues(?) and blue suit is a no-no. Pandering black and white tie that doesn't match the outfit. Looks short. The one headphone in is egregious. 4/10 start. PIF NPC. hashtag concerned. Old looking picture though.

I didn't expect to win any of the finals we have played. Yeh it hurt but there was a feeling of inevitability. I had hope but did I think we would win in the pit of my stomach? No. The Chelsea semi hurt just as much. Because we played so well, up against a good but beatable team and we would've been solid favourites in the final. The Man U semi, I had no hope or excitement for. If we beat Arsenal over 2 legs but lose to Spurs in the final. That would be the biggest hurt of them all. Precisely because good or bad Arsenal sides, we don't usually beat them, definitely not away. Good or bad Newcastle side - we can go to Spurs and win home or away. I do not know the feeling of going into a cup final and believing in the bottom of my heart that we should win.

Man City squad is routinely deeper and despite being multiclub they pay 15% more in wages - probably closer to 30% more like for like.Only Man City first team squad and coaching staff are calculated as Man City FFP costs, everybody else.. leadership team etc. is accounted for under City Group. Everyone at Liverpool contributes to their wage. That 15-30% in wages is the difference between the 2 clubs imo.

2.5 years. Bloom hires good people but Bloom himself is the most important piece - he's the "genius".

It’s not embarrassment. It’s pain. I’ll enjoy the final against Liverpool no matter what. Against Spurs I’ll believe we will win, so losing would hurt so much more. If there’s one ‘top’ team we should beat its spurs. Which is why it would hurt so much to lose to them. Exactly. We might actually be ultimate Spurs - I don’t want to see it. That’s par for the course. To Arsenal? Absolutely. I can handle that. That’s normal.

I felt we would lose that. I was hopeful but not expectant. Spurs? I’m not mentally prepared to expect to win a Cup Final. I’ve never had the feeling.

Would we be favourites? we’ll 100% loss if we are favourites. Whoever is favourite will lose.

You know better than that.

They’ll be nervous Spurs. As would we.

Exactly. Spurs? SPURS? I’ll be bricking it for weeks. The match I will be a bag of nerves. We lose a close one I’ll cry. Liverpool I’ll enjoy the day. I’ll not expect to win at any point. Even 2-0 up in added time.

That’s it. It would hurt a lot more. Man for man - today - we are better than Spurs. And it’s Spurs. We beat them away with Bruce. Liverpool I’ll just enjoy the day.

… why do I want Liverpool to win? Losing to Spurs in the final I would cry. I want to keep my hopes down.

Who would we prefer to win? more chance of beating Spurs tbf.

Those are the types of goals I expect him to get - sharp at the backpost. Lovely.