The College Dropout

Sels playing out of his skin.

Salah’s usually poor from Feb onwards for some reason.

Was just going to say. His touch has been awful.

Great games on TV.

Costs are spread over contract lengths and wages are annual. So Tonali and Barnes cost us the same this season as they did last season.

City looked open all game. I think they will end up 65-72 points unless they strengthen in the window.

The second goal? Powerful header. Was behind him in a flash.

Wheels coming off at Chelsea.

Been a basketball game this all game. City have no control. They need to play like us at points. Just go super defensive. They can’t control games with the ball anymore.

Brentford score so many goals.

Most other teams signed promising youngsters. We signed someone that would never come close to justifying the fee. Ever. Not even half.

That’s not how it works

Don't like CBs that can't win headers. Unless a baller like Schar and he wins enough in the air.

Would take £10m for sure. In the summer.

Why? We probably wouldn't replace him now. He's a valued member of the squad, he's just too expensive to sit on the bench. Sell him in the summer. If we qualify for CL/Europa and find new revenue streams, he's suddenly starting 20 games a season.

Because that's not how it works. The costs carry. It's not a 1 season issue. We've not spent much this season and if we don't sell well or suddenly get massive revenue, we'll not buy much next season either.

Aye. Good transfer. But they need a LW or ST more.

Rice is tops.

Amanda was a great voice. She's a suit but seemed authentic in energy. The other suits feel like suits.

PIF club al-Hilal bid £70m for Nunez

They overspent and overindulged Howe. BUT if Tonali doesn’t get suspended or Botman doesn’t do his ACL - just one more rub of the green we probably qualify for Europe - with good luck we get into Europa League. Then it’s a gamble that paid off. And they did all of that before they knew PL would be handing out points deductions.

What makes you certain of this? Why do you think we haven't we offered him that already?

Just what i've read in reports. I think there were some discussions earlier in the summer/spring of 24 but reports were the club were ok with how things are. They spoke to Isak around the time Gordon's contract was being negotiated. As Isak has a long time left on his contract. Gordon signed and talks with Isak haven't been reported as being advanced or seen as a priority. My assumption is - if the club were certain Isak was at the centre of the project over the next few years, it would be a priority and we would've got it signed around the time the Gordon deal was signed. Again, I assume the club want to wait and see on multiple fronts - safe in the knowledge we could get a great fee for Isak.

We'll have to pay him close to the going rate. That's likely to be in a new stratosphere for us let's say 200-275k. If we aren't willing to get close, bling bling boy or comfy chill guy - he'll want off. It is what it is. I just wish this team could land a Cup and give the CL another go. It's possible.

Yeh fairs. It’s all bad though. Was it Skipp that went for £20m in the summer? No FFP funny business. We don’t get those types of fees.