Northern Monkey

I'll admit to owt me, doesn't make it true. Like those nerds at the end of Dead Poet's Society, only less gay. And not standing on a desk. And not a boarding school hom.

HAahahahahahahahaa!! you were probably one of the "i support Souness/Roeder because he's the manager of the club and we have to support the club" nobheads weren't you.

To get back to the heart of the thread - the right man isn't avaliable, but a BETTER man is. Oh, and Graeme Souness sucked cock. For baccy.

I would be on your side if our manager is Mourinho, SAF, Wenger, or even Allardyce. But what we have is Roeder, this explains everything. Did Roeder make him unabel to control a football, run to the correct positions, or pass with anylike like a pro footballers level of skill?? Was Roeder controlling him remotely? I can't believe there are still fans wanting to suck him off because of a cleverly editted stuff on the web, and a reputation in Spain. How many people who go to the match - and see the movement off the ball, etc, that you DON'T see on telly - actually think he was a good individual footballer, and how many think he stank like Shambles jockstrap? For me - jockstrap.

Least ITK ever.

It definately their new shirt, but obviously the sponsor is put on with photoshop. XL will be their sponsor tho, and their logo will look like that. i know that, it just looks shit with the logo faked on.

That is ENTIRLEY conjecture. Also, there's a good chance we'd be in the Championship if Roeder stays, i reckon. Is it worth THAT, just to get a fella in who ised to be a very good footballer, years ago?

He doesn't need a DoF, he needs the sack. Of we keep Roeder, it'll be the final straw.

Something strange at Newcastle United? Surely not. I'm not convinced by the Allardyce idea, in that i don't like him as a manager, but in the position we are in now, we HAVE to hope its true.

how clearly fake is the west ham one??

Exactly - could have had him for nowt last summer - if he wants him this year, Redknapp will want a decent fee, as he has another year left on his contract. Still can't understand why he passed up the chance on Campbell, then signed Sibierski - other than shear desperation at the end of the transfer window! MJ Stupidity, desperation and a lack of managerial ability. In other words clueless rat I think clueless is kind. Mr Bean is clueless. Frank Spencer is clueless. Roeder is a stupiud, lying, good for nothing cunt.

Exactly - could have had him for nowt last summer - if he wants him this year, Redknapp will want a decent fee, as he has another year left on his contract. Still can't understand why he passed up the chance on Campbell, then signed Sibierski - other than shear desperation at the end of the transfer window! MJ Stupidity, desperation and a lack of managerial ability.

Mind, he has got a MASSIVE head. If he does come here, someone needs to tell him to lean away from the camera in the post match interview.

Andy Thorn, s*** defender. Ruel Fox.

Live ? I'm gonna challenge you on this We lost 2-0 at OT last game of our relegation season (88/89) - quite why that game would be live Sure you haven't got MOTD highlights? I'm sure it'll warm up soon.....

Glenn's meeting list 1. Get sacked 2. Agree compensation/pay off 3. Agree gagging clause 4. Say goodbye to players & staff <crosses fingers>

I don't trust that wanker Roeder. He's more likely to sign fucking Marcus Bent.

You see a combination of Shola and someone else working?? You don't actually watch any of our games, ever, do you.

What a cunt you are, Roeder. Please, please fuck off, and take your lack of ability, your lies, and your incompetence with you. You twat.

oh yes he will. Kuyt has had a decent, if not great first season. The one issue is his lack of pace, but Liverpool would have known about that when they signed him. So it obviously isn't a huge issue to them. Of the strikers we have now, Crouch and Kuyt should be here for the long term, both are good strikers that both offer a very different style of play, and if Liverpool get a good goal scorer in, there is no reason whatsover to suggest that Kuyt wouldn't be a regular. He will be. They have two good all rounders who work their arses off for the team are are good for 15 - 20 goals each. What Liverpool need is a bit more variation in their forwards, and a bit more quality to add to what they have. But hell - who doesn't need a bit more quality eh! Crouch will be sold and Kuyt will step down the pecking order when Villa and one other arrive. Kuyt is ok and has done a goodish job, but for me hasn't lived upto the hype when it seemed 2/3 years ago 12 clubs were after him. ITK? No, just guesswork. Well done.

Shepherd worried about someone elses baggage?? Jesus, that man has a nerve.

Assuming Sam Allardyce is indeed appointed as our new manager ... 1. How much time are you willing to give him before you demand success? A good manager will show within a few months that he is such - not necessarily by immediately threatening the top 6, but by the way he goes about things - new players, tactics, team selection, getting rid of the rubbish, etc. If he does that, and proves that he is good enough in the first instance, he should get a couple of seasons to have a crack at it. 2. What's the target you set for him? Establishing us as a permanent top 6 team,who with a bit of luck could maybe even challenge for 4th. I think that is the level he should be aiming at as a manager, and its the position from which we shoudl then be looking to get a great manager. 3. If we play ugly, but get results, are you happy? If we play ugly, yet results are not good, will you still be happy? Its a common but surprising misconception that people who claim to watch football, and feel they have the right to comment on it, say that Bolton play ugly. They play PHYSICAL when they have to, and they don't give up. but 'ugly'? No. 4. If Sam Allardyce decides to pick a fight (verbal or whatever) with someone (FA, Arsene Wenger, Roy Keane, Freddy Shepherd), will you support him? That depends on the context. Only a moron would blindly support someone just because they play for/manage NUFC, if they are in the wrong. 5. Will you applaud the board if the appointment of Sam Allardyce turns out to be a good one, eventually? Yes. If they get stick for fucking up, they should get praise for doing well. Also, the tone of the question is rubbish...."eventually"? No-one knows how fast he'd turn out to be a good appointment, if at all. To assume it would be "eventual" is wrong. 6. Will you slag the board, if the appointment of Sam Allardyce turns out to be a sad tradegy? Depends. If he is given the right backing, and the right players, and royally fucks it up, then they got the wrong man again, so they'd deserve criticism. 7. If Sam Allardyce turns out to be a success, will you gloat that you have always wanted him to be our manager? I haven't always wanted him. I'd rather have others, but as our manager is the worst in the league, he's a far better option currently. 8. If Sam Allardyce does not turn out to be a success, will you gloat that you have always NOT wanted him to be our manager? No, thats a fucking stupid question. But i woudl state that i wanted someone else. 9. Does it matter if Allardyce's recruitments are mainly foreigners, regardless if he delivers results? No. 10. Will you be happy to trust the club's sizable (assumption) on Allardyce's hand? That question makes fuck all sense.

Liverpool, without a shadow of a doubt.

Carrick is far, far better than Parker. Anyone who geniunely thinks Parker is better either have a bizarre idea of what a midifelder should do, or is looking at him through typical Toon-tinted glasses, in the same way some do when they talk about Dyer being international class, or Shambles being a premiership-level defender.

Jesus. piss take, surely? No, i doubt it.