Rich

That'd be my guess.

Come on the Hull. Most Northern team in the playoffs would mean I'd support them anyway, and the fact they've never been in the top flight.

You're not getting away with that at using Oliver to try and back up a point. Not that Oliver.

For what it's worth, I think Zog's far less of a twat than people think, he's had a lot to deal with the past few years. If he wants to leave, then fair play and good luck to him. He's still one of my favourite players for his ability on the park above all else. Fast, exciting, dynamic player with a bit of flair about him, it will be sad to see him go.

Do I count? Entitled to our opinions tbh You must do, otherwise he'd have said "they don't count".

Good point, well made.

"All you lot"? Isn't it just SpinS and Sniffer saying that?

Off us.

Huggisco or Janitimo (username one is far better!)

I know of a thread that might be right up your alley!

So if we sign Pennant... then Lennon becomes available and we sign him... if Bentley becomes available after that should we sign him as well then? Is that how we should do this? I'd like them in that order, backwards, if I had the choice myself.

Just amuses me that players are either brilliant or shite on here, constantly. He's better than what we have and you should always try and sign players who are better than what you have. Apparently.

Is he shite lads? Really?

That's a bit of a wank answer. Let's be honest here. Let's get some bollocks on the table and have some straight answers.

In Wullie's basement. Bye bye Speccy! Oh dear. Laughed very loudly there.

Where is that cocky bastard, anyway?

How long have you been waiting to use that one for then? It's about the fifth time I've said something along those lines in the last month, man!

I thought it was a top five now, anyway? At least that's what Dr. Spectrum was telling us back in November, or something?

Another good point, but effectively supported with good supply from either flank and partnered with the right sort of player (HESKEY!!!) he could still bang the goals in. He's not the player he was, but he'll still put the ball in the net if you give him the chances.

I think it may depend as much on the players that leave than the players that arrive, in some cases. It would be nice to think we'd have a squad capable of interchanging between the two depending on injuries/suspensions/form... but surely that's too much to ask? What would people prefer to see? As much as I've enjoyed seeing this current formation click, I struggle to think of anything better than two goalscoring forwards, two cavalier wingers, two quality central midfielders, two marauding fullbacks and a Belgian marauding centre-half bombing forward at the opposition.

Blimey.. What's he done to you? Bummed your girlfriend? :lol: :lol:

Was he? Apparently so, to Fulham. That was bollocks though. Not according to Oliver.

A man after my own heart.

I like this thing that we're doing at the minute (whether it's a 4-3-3 or a 4-4-2 "diamond", whatever you want to call it) and think it could be really good if we added a few better players into the mix in place of Taylor, Geremi and Viduka in particular, but I still get the feeling that Keegan might switch us back to his favoured 4-4-2 formation next season. Two wingers, two driving midfielders, and Owen partnered with a new striker. I suppose we'll start to see as the players start rolling in, but what do people reckon as it stands? I'll say 4-4-2.

This. By the way: best avatar ever.