Mick

We should be looking to win this and should go at them from the start.

I did.

It would have been better if he'd kept his gob shut, I hope the lip reader is wrong about what he's supposed to have said.

Keegan as a player did more than most people have ever done for this club, he topped that as a manager.

Saw him before the Norwich game buying a programme, he's literally a dwarf. He's had a ST in the milburn for years and is indeed vertically challenged. Christ, imagine being sat next to that droning b******. I once had an argument with him in the Leases car park.

Of course it is, Keegan had to beat Leicester to keep us in the 2nd division, Leicester were playing the same game to get promoted.

Leicester won the League Cup twice, they beat Boro and Tranmere.

All involved deserve massive praise but the main ones are probably those who looked after him on the pitch and on the way to hospital. Both clubs have done really well in this and have probably saved his life.

Of course it would, the club could still have Ranger for each individual offence committed by him but would they be sackable offences? The football club must have a disciplinary procedure as hundreds of people are employed and they will all be covered by the same rules and they must all be given the same treatment. For instance if somebody you work with has been off work 10 times this year and nothing happened to them then you would have a good case against your company if you were disciplined and had only been off work 8 times. A disciplinary procedure must be seen to be fair, not only to those who are disciplined but also to the ones who never do anything wrong. Using the above example, why should somebody be allowed to be off 10 times when you are never off? If Ranger is breaking club curfews then is it fair that the club should do nothing? It’ll not seem too fair to the players who don’t go on the drink when asked not to. I was all for the club disciplining Carroll and Barton and don’t see how they can sack Ranger for what looks to be lesser offences than allegedly committed by the other two. The easiest way to sack him would be to claim that he was bringing the clubs name into disrepute, his defence would probably be that he hadn't done anything as bad as Carroll or Barton and he would probably have a fair point with that. He's almost certainly now a lost cause at this club and we might have to pay his contract up to get rid of him unless another club was stupid enough to take a chance on him.

You've just done it to yourself, you don't need to thank anybody for that.

Did he really say that?

Is that not possible?

I'll decide what I post, thanks. I'm more than happy that we won again yesterday, our performance after 20 or 30 minutes at home to Norwich isn't good enough and I'll say so.

He must have some say in transfers, even if it's only in saying where he wants strengthening and not who comes in.

Give over, every person who is saying we could play better are saying that the points total and league position is better than expected.

If that was the case then why didn't we bring somebody in during the January transfer window when we spent £10 million on a forward?

We were all over Fulham and we were 1-0 at half time, 2nd half we didn't play well and got slaughtered and weren't trying to pass it around in that half.

Not a single person is suggesting that winning isn't better than entertaining, some of us thinks we can play better without negatively affecting our results.

Is there any guarantee that we'll continue to pick up points if we carry on playing the same way?

Has it got to be one or the other?

Some of us are questioning Pardew and the lack of any style in our play, nobody who is sticking up for Pardew can claim that the football is good to watch, can they?

Nobody has ever said they'd rather lose 3-4 than win 1-0 so nobody is living up to any stereotype.

I lost it with Pardew when this happened. Absolute arsehole. There was nothing wrong with what HBA did yet he chooses to lambast him and not say anything to Williamson, horrible management. How do you know he didn't have a go at Williamson? Were you on Pardewcam? I made a point of watching how Pardew reacted to what happened; he only had a go at HBA. Laugh all you want but the truth hurts. I assume you were at the game, you stopped paying attention to everything else, drowned out the noise from the crowd, were sitting right near Pardew and heard him single out Ben Arfa? It isn't difficult to see which player the manager is talking/shouting to. So you zoned out completed as soon as HBA picked up the ball and spent the entire time watching Pardew until Williamson gave the ball away? What are you going on about? You don't even know what you're arguing anymore. As several people have already pointed out to you, give it up, it's extremely childish. Jon saw you on his tele, he's got you banged to rights.