On the whole it's one of his better interviews and seems a tad more conciliatory.
There's postives and negatives to take from it imho.
The Tiote views don't tell us anything we didn't already know.
The SDA views seem an absolutely ridiculous thing to make public. 'We still call it St. James's' hardly sells the naming rights to third parties if the guy charged with doing so essentially confirms it'll always be known as something else.
However, what it does show is that he's trying to empathise with fans feeling in my John Humble.
Also, interesting to note that he concedes mistakes have been made.
It's a marked improvement on the 'It is a fact' shite of the past.
The overidding concern for me is that we're only ever minutes away from a shite decision but on the whole there has been progress this past couple of years and that should be appreciated or at the very least recognised.