Ronaldo

Benayoun doesn't even start man. Good player though.

Eden Hazard. He's the next Figo.

No offence lads but you're both going to regret typing that in 2 years. Babel has all the talent in the world and has been horrifcally misused by Benitez. Kuyt is decent but ultimately not good enough for a top 4 team.

We already have a back up LB.

He's a terrible 'footballer' Beckford and all those who don't like Harewood will absolutely despise him. His attitude isn't really a problem though, he gets a dog's abuse at Elland Road and generally turns the other cheek.

Yeah man, I do think he'd get 10 goals in this divison should he sign in January but in all honestly i'd stick with Harewood who's easily capable of that from January himself. Believe it or not Harewood's also better in open play than Beckford.

January, not June lads.

Guthrie must have 10 assists now. He needs to start partially because of that but most because of his fantastic potential. I think we all know that Ryan Taylor will never amount to much.

Both are very good players in this league, how is it a nasty feeling?

Ridiculously ignorant bias as per usual.

Why the fuck doesn't he do it then?

Aye, stood next to me. Spent the entire first half calling Agbonlahor 'a black bastard who wants to play for England but doesn't even have an english name'. Balled his eyes out at FT.

Nolan and Barton in the middle could be interesting.

Not nearly as effective as Guthrie though.

... is that a pisstake? Ranger's missed countless sitters, man. You think he would have buried them two headers against Swansea, or pulled off that lob at Barnsley? Come off it man. Are you saying Ranger doesn't have the ability to score the goals Harewood is scoring? Ranger may have missed a couple of chances but look at Harewood against Notts Forest (couldn't even stick his leg out a yard to knock in a cross in the first half) and he missed a sitter against Boro. Ranger starts less games than Harewood and so, as I've mentioned before, most of the time when Ranger comes on we've given up attacking. We persevered with Harewood after some **** games, why can't we do the same with Ranger? Because Ranger isn't a proven goalscorer?

That's me convinced.

Should be obvious mate.

Aye, plenty of ball retention without him. Ranger has intelligence?

Carroll has the potential to become a good player, not a top player but a solid enough striker. There's no bias here. Myself and I suspect the majority of the rest of toon fans are confident of Harewood scoring more or less everytime he steps onto the pitch, reason in itself surely to want him to start.

Just something lying around on the hard drive?

When did you become such a terrible poster JH? Carroll has had a lot more time on the pitch than Harewood and Marlon has only really been match fit for the last 5 or 6 games. What an absurd argument though, he only scores goals than any of us could score.

Ranger and Carroll don't seem to.

5 players plus Colo makes more than half a team like. Not really, we've used how many?