Incognito

Referee is having a good game for us. Not often we can say that.

Tiote still looks way off the pace.

Jammy cunts. Doumet? Silly Mackem cunt.

Gini has been quiet thus far.

We mark the empty zones

Colo must be the most pulled out of position centre half in the League. Most of the time he leaves his position without being forced out.

Good start

Seen them given.

A goal to Klippety surely?

Wolves defend well enough from the middle of the park thus leaving Williamson's lack of pace not so obvious. He's fine in such circumstances. When he has a weak barrier in front of him and he gets left with balls going over him and into the channels, then he has a problem. He also seems to be a player who needs confidence and at this level, he clearly has it. In the Premiership, he lacks confidence AND a decent central defensive partner. He honestly didn't put a foot wrong today. Also didn't lump any Pardballs.

Man of the match.

Is there a more miserable twat in the public eye than Garry Birtles. I couldn't stand the bumfluff moustachioed cunt when he played even moreso now.

1-0 Wolves. Williamson marshalling his defenders superbly this far. Terrific communication.

SS1 in 5.

Agreed and I'm Jewish. I'm not really but if I was, I would still agree. I'll see your Alan Pardew, and raise a Mike Ashley... (quietly shuffles Cattermole, Ball, and Wise cards in his hand...) Ball and Wise. Sounds like a game of fantasy comedy acts.

Why have Arsenal decided to wear their away kit when it looks more like the Wednesday strip than the home one ?

2nd was just rank bad defending, 3rd was just a counter attack, and to be fair, a very good one. But the first set the agenda for the game. Even had he given the pen, which in my opinion he should not have, but not sent off Coloccini, which should have happened, then I still maintain we'd not have lost that game. I appreciate it's hypothetical but that's just my thoughts.

You didn't think the penalty was lucky? You didn't think the award of a ridiculous red card was lucky? You didn't think that the worst player on the field getting injured in the first half so that he could be replaced with a genuine threat was lucky? You didn't think that Clattercunt getting away with murder for 90 minutes was lucky? All of these things went against us, mostly through no fault of our own.

Sunderland benefitted hugely from the injuries to Toivanen and O'Shit. For one, there is no way on God's planet that Toivanen would have threaded that ball to Fletcher. It's ridiculously churlish to say that they weren't unbelievably lucky in every way on Sunday. Yes, the defending for the second was appalling but even down to Pantyliner having his usual good game against us compared with his charity the week before, everything went their way.

I've never seen a free kick given for a shoulder to shoulder let alone a penalty. Ludicrous decision backed up by an even more mental one. I must be honest, when I heard the whistle go, I thought he was going to give them an indirect for obstruction, that would have been bad enough imo.

What details of the prosecution case have led you to that conclusion? I don't know if AJ is guilty or innocent, possibly only two people do. We'll find out next year when all the evidence has been put before a jury, and until then we could well do without amateur cyber-lawyers using supposition, hearsay, and speculation to decide whether he has broken the law. As for his celebration? Only a cretin would believe it was mocking MH17. I notice the idiot who wrote the piece for the Telegraph has apologised and made a donation to the Bobby Robson Foundation. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/sunderland/11953699/Sunderland-3-Newcastle-0-match-report-Fabricio-Coloccini-sees-red-dreadful-derby-run-continues.html The Telegraph used to be a decent paper. I'd be inclined to agree had he not ran the full length of the pitch to do it in front of our fans. The only thing stopping it from being absolutely blatant is his hands being open rather than flat. At the very least it's poor judgement, at worst it's heinous. I wouldn't put it past his character at all. Know much about his character? I think there's fair assumptions to be made given that he's about to be tried for fiddling. The CPS don't do these things frivolously in general.

I'd say the injuries helped them more than us. Toivanen was nondescript before leaving and O'Shea for Coates isn't a step down imo either. Defoe certainly gave us more problems than Toivanen.

No chance at all of that. It's the laws that are at fault here, not the ref. It's always surprised me that the goal-scoring opportunity rule has not had any serious review in the 30 years that it's been around. Allardyce himself has queried this today. With fouls which deny a goal scoring opportunity, there should just be a penalty, regardless of where the incident took place. The ref can then decide on a yellow or a red, depending on the seriousness of the foul. The punishment would then fit the crime in a much fairer way. It wasn't a goal scoring opportunity unless Fletcher morphs into Stretch Armstrong and expands his leg 10 yards to nick the ball over Fat Farm.

It's how you get a kid to open their mouth, isn't it? "Here comes the aeroplane! Nnnyyyyyewwww!" :lol: Quality as usual.

Any shot on target seems to be a goal with this flabbercunt in goal.