Jump to content

NG32

Member
  • Posts

    55,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NG32

  1. Hmm I thought that last pitch was heavy on the legs, can we not got for a grass pitch?
  2. Of course they would but how could that happen right now? It needs to happen before next season begins. I think Ashley will have a job on his hands convincing anyone it will even if he genuinely intends to make it happen. Exactly, so what if they need cash now? I think everyone agrees that a price drop is insignificant compared to Newcastle doing well, but right now the only realistic way to get people to buy tickets is a price drop. They then need to follow that up with an improvement of the playing staff in July/August and a new manager as soon as possible. When does the new TV wedge come into play?
  3. Eggs fucking zaktly! We need to see some progress, i would pay more to help the club along but i just dont see anything at the moment.
  4. Your first statement Coco. This was my first statement: "Who says there'll be losses? If this move gets attendances up to around 50,000 there would be no loss from this season." What's so bad about it? I meant this one "Newcastle drop season ticket prices, Newcastle fans complain, couldn't f***ing make it up, some of you are clowns." Aye, well done then they also announce that Kinnear will be staying on if his health is ok which they except it will be. Give with one hand take with the other. And tbh i would pay more for a season ticket if i knew we would get some progress. And by progress i dont mean finishing 3rd or summik daft like that.
  5. You my friend are the biggest clown of all. Based on what? Give me an argument Krusty. Do you mind. He's very sensitive about that layer on top of his cock. Not anymore, i've accpeted it existance.
  6. You my friend are the biggest clown of all. Based on what? Give me an argument Krusty. Your first statement Coco.
  7. You my friend are the biggest clown of all.
  8. Well, on the BBC prediction thingy I had us on 43 pts and that was with massive hammerings off Man U, Chelsea and Liverpool. 11th Placed on 43.
  9. “Joe Kinnear is still Newcastle United manager and he will continue to be going forward,” sigh.
  10. I dont like the idea you only get the price of the 2007/08 season if you renew before May as well, these cunts really are rubbing people up the wrong way.
  11. Oh thank you so much Derek, thank you! c***. Nothing to do with the fact they think a lot of people who have the option won't renew. I cant make my mind up what to do, i really want to support the team but the more that comes out the clubs owners moths the more they annoy me. I love my fucking seat, i just dont know what to do. The Everton game drained me.
  12. and he did this because 2 vital strikers were passed fit to start for him for the first time, meaning we had 3 very good strikers to attack with. his methods didnt just "click" suddenly. did we attack teams in the same manner with smith, ameobi and owen upfront? no, we didnt. dude, you're starting to annoy me with the repetitiveness of this now...i agree with you in the sense that when we had those three things clicked and he changed the system to accommodate, and it worked very well what was the alternative before they came back? what would a better manager have done with the tools at his disposal? only thing i can see is throw in untested bairns in the hope they'd do better than duff/smith etc... what else could have have done with such s****? which, again, is my entire point. the thread (i think) is bashing somebody because the football we're playing isnt great but with all the players missing what are people expecting? we looked s*** last year before martins and viduka came back so, like you say, how else can we attack teams with any potency without our best 3 strikers? if we get owen, martins and viduka (and possibly barton) all fit and playing we'll look infinitely better, like we did last year. It's not a bashing thread, more of a questioning one of where are we going? Not now, but come next season. Will we look to bring in a highly rated manager who will build a squad over the next couple of years that will play attractive progressive football? Or will we look to hire a cheap coach who will toe the line and buy hard working players who will graft out a result and try and keep us out of relegation trouble? I'm asking because it's undeniable that Kinnear was offered a two year contract extension. How does that sit with the expectations of last summer when Keegan was downplaying Ashley's aims of a top four place, saying we could aim for top eight maybe? Only the board can answer that in May, the decisions they make will tell us a lot. Good post. I would like to think we will bring in a highly rated manager playing attractive football but I cant see such a manager coming here with the current footballing set up (i.e. without full control over transfers and in all likelihood with little funding available) There will be funds available according to Llambias, the money raised from Given and N'Zogbia, plus we should be losing a few highly paid wasters at the end of the season. Someone on TT claims to be ITK that Steve Bruce is coming here in May, read what you want into that. I don't think Bruce is mates with our lot in charge can't see it happening. Gus Poyet if Kinnear can't return imo. Whelan would never let Bruce join us anyway, he hates ashley after ashey reported his company for price fixing. Looking at how JJB is fairing at the moment I don't think he can be overly picky with his finances. Bruce will probably have some sort of clause in his contract anyway. Dave Whelan has sold his stake in JJB. That was kept quiet.
  13. Oh thank you so much Derek, thank you! Cunt.
  14. Put warnings on season tickets, "this is a football match NOT a play or an opera, please expect foul language and noise, also the pies are to hot"
  15. Its a fucking football match, expect bad lingo and noise.
  16. It took time to bring the change about FFS. He had to get the players minds switched from nagative football to open football. Birmingham was the turning point, where got a draw but could have won it. Libertine always sniping at KK, any little chance. Its ok tho, you just bend history to suit your argument. it took time to get 3 very good players back (and staying fit) to take the team forward in matches and score goals. the front 3 took the pressure off the s*** midfield the same as a good midfield will take the pressure off a defence. simple as that. Obviously the manager doesn't deserve any credit at all for changing the whole shape of the team though. to some extent. "playing your best players" is what its called at other clubs. dropping smith and ameobi to play martins and viduka isnt rocket science. You're absolutely pathetic. martins or viduka didnt start a game for keegan before the birmingham match and then they come back in and we start doing well. did keegan "change their mentality" or did we just get 2 very decent/vital players back in place of 2 s*** ones? the keegan thing. obviously. The players coming back was obviously instrumental but it was Keegans tactics that got us the results we did. Not many managers would have had the balls to play Owen, Martins & Viduka together. Allardyce certainly didn't. keegans tactics did nothing for the few months before 2 vital players were fit again. worth noting in the context of the thread. He was trying to turn the mentality of the team around. Did you expect instant results? glenn roeder could but keegan couldnt? shock horror. this is hardly something to cling to when plenty of new managers taking over during the season have "honeymoon periods" when results improve fairly instantly for a while. sunderland or blackburn for a recent example. even tottenham had one. Honeymoon period? I seem to remember it took a while to turn things round. which is my point. f***s sake. Dont you swear at me
  17. Count me in, Same teams as last time, build up some rivalry?
  18. It took time to bring the change about FFS. He had to get the players minds switched from nagative football to open football. Birmingham was the turning point, where got a draw but could have won it. Libertine always sniping at KK, any little chance. Its ok tho, you just bend history to suit your argument. it took time to get 3 very good players back (and staying fit) to take the team forward in matches and score goals. the front 3 took the pressure off the s*** midfield the same as a good midfield will take the pressure off a defence. simple as that. Obviously the manager doesn't deserve any credit at all for changing the whole shape of the team though. to some extent. "playing your best players" is what its called at other clubs. dropping smith and ameobi to play martins and viduka isnt rocket science. You're absolutely pathetic. martins or viduka didnt start a game for keegan before the birmingham match and then they come back in and we start doing well. did keegan "change their mentality" or did we just get 2 very decent/vital players back in place of 2 s*** ones? the keegan thing. obviously. The players coming back was obviously instrumental but it was Keegans tactics that got us the results we did. Not many managers would have had the balls to play Owen, Martins & Viduka together. Allardyce certainly didn't. keegans tactics did nothing for the few months before 2 vital players were fit again. worth noting in the context of the thread. He was trying to turn the mentality of the team around. Did you expect instant results? glenn roeder could but keegan couldnt? shock horror. this is hardly something to cling to when plenty of new managers taking over during the season have "honeymoon periods" when results improve fairly instantly for a while. sunderland or blackburn for a recent example. even tottenham had one. Honeymoon period? I seem to remember it took a while to turn things round.
  19. http://www.erie.gov/sheriff/graphics/hannibal06.jpg The future of football
  20. It took time to bring the change about FFS. He had to get the players minds switched from nagative football to open football. Birmingham was the turning point, where got a draw but could have won it. Libertine always sniping at KK, any little chance. Its ok tho, you just bend history to suit your argument. it took time to get 3 very good players back (and staying fit) to take the team forward in matches and score goals. the front 3 took the pressure off the s*** midfield the same as a good midfield will take the pressure off a defence. simple as that. Obviously the manager doesn't deserve any credit at all for changing the whole shape of the team though. to some extent. "playing your best players" is what its called at other clubs. dropping smith and ameobi to play martins and viduka isnt rocket science. You're absolutely pathetic. martins or viduka didnt start a game for keegan before the birmingham match and then they come back in and we start doing well. did keegan "change their mentality" or did we just get 2 very decent/vital players back in place of 2 s*** ones? the keegan thing. obviously. The players coming back was obviously instrumental but it was Keegans tactics that got us the results we did. Not many managers would have had the balls to play Owen, Martins & Viduka together. Allardyce certainly didn't. keegans tactics did nothing for the few months before 2 vital players were fit again. worth noting in the context of the thread. He was trying to turn the mentality of the team around. Did you expect instant results?
  21. Shit match, is this what we have ti look forward to next season.
×
×
  • Create New...