Kaizero

That can't have done your WC bid any good.

Atlético Madrid and Bayer Leverkusen.

It's one thing to lose to "better" sides when they actually play better. The matches against Atlético and now Leverkusen have just been jokes. Seriously. I'd take another 4-0 rape from Leverkusen rather than the embarrassment of outplaying them and losing to a lucky shot. It's just idiotic. Why, why does this always happen? Argghhh!

So frustrating to lose to a lucky shot when we've been by far the better side. So fucking annoying. I'm enraged.

They're filling the footballs with hot air to try and make them stay in shape.

The Rosenborg - Leverkusen match is apparently the "coldest" in the history of the European Cups, currently at -16.

Why the fuck are TV2 saying Adler is out then? Adressa also reporting t as little as 50 minutes ago. Saying he's already left Norway to get treatment.

Adler is out and a pretty much untested 20 year old goalkeeper is in for Leverkusen apparently.

CORRECT ANSWER! http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/06/p&brain2.gif

-16 at the moment, will probably drop a bit more towards kick-off. Rosenborg still have a tiny chance of advancing if they win their last two games, so they'll be well up for it given how it's not illogical for Atletico to beat Leverkusen in the last match. Leverkusen are also playing a weakened side.

It wouldn't be a joke if the US got it for 2022 and England didn't get it for 2018, though. As they're not competing for the same WC and are up against different competition. That's my point. If they bid for the same WC, I could see where it'd make more sense for England to get it than the US. But they're not, hence it's a redundant point/argument to make.

Not really as they're not in the same bid group, so it's a bit redundant claiming it'd be a joke if they got it when they're not up against the same competition. I'm aware they're not bidding against one another. Not sure how it's "redundant" either. Just commenting in general - England '66, USA '94, and Korea/Japan '02. Which of those three should get its next turn first? England - '66 Portugal & Spain - Spain '82, Portugal - Never Russia - Never Belgium & Netherlands - Never Do you not see how your "argument" is redundant? Two and a half of the other bids have never had a WC, shouldn't they get their turn first according to your logic?

Not really as they're not in the same bid group, so it's a bit redundant claiming it'd be a joke if they got it when they're not up against the same competition.

USA! USA! USA! USA!

Flame haired enforcer, mind you.

You've forgotten which profile you're logged into I think. That's not Broken English.

That said, he's one of the MLS main attractions and I look forward to seeing more of him next season. Just a shame he's playing for the Sounders.

I'm really not botherd about the 2022 bid to be honest, I'm more concerned about us getting 2018, though if I could choose the 2 winners, it would be US and Australia. Now that would be an odd WC logistically.

It'll be the end of everything nice if Russia and/or Qatar get one or both WCs. http://media.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/517631/698617.jpg

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l5wzrcYtIA1qcdnwqo1_500.png

http://retarded-pique.tumblr.com/ <-- Best tumblr ever.

£80 @ 3.15 returns £252. When they're planning to play with this shit on their heads you know it's fucking cold. http://pub.tv2.no/multimedia/TV2/archive/00845/rbk_845897p.jpg

Fair play to her to try to make money off it, though. But yeah, fucking hell.

F5'ing the page and it always goes up, well cool.

16 thousand now.