Newcastle Fan

great,more debuts nice to see pav and luque have something in common

if zoggy gets banned, we are in deep shit

Pattison, really?

You probably answered your own question there. well said

yea me too,don't think luque or any of our players will do good in the game so if i was roeder,i would shove him in the starting eleven is this hard game so i can prove he sucks (even though glenn did try to do that vs palermo and failed...) we got nothing to lose really,its CHELSEA we are facing,even an optimist will hope for us to lose with 2 or less goals... a win will sure be something but then again our feet must stay on the ground,because its something that won't happen unless every player on the pitch give a 110%

i left it open for you to say who u think should play.. there is no other LW in the team,unless roeder plans on starting fatty pattison..

Given Huntington Ramage Taylor Babayaro Milner Butt N'Zogbia Luque Dyer Martins -who do u want to see at the starting eleven? -this formation is based on the current injurys,some players might get banned,injured,others may return

pathetic.. but i can't see him turning to a big star anytime soon..

so will sib play the chelsea game? coz he was limping the whole time... hope he plays Emre,thank god for that,but OUCH solano's injury was not serious,i think he will be out just for the next game hopfully..

u mean when duff and carr out..

come the blues game,we might see troisi and carroll get their debuts.. DAMN Were Fuc*ed up...

broke our own recored i think we reached 15 once this season..

from what i saw today,i think big pav have a better chance to play as LW then luque I'd rather play Obrien left wing.. he adds even more pace in attack. By the way isn't Duff returning soon? physioroom.com say his injury is till december 26 didnt anyone else noticed that we started winning since he got injured and zoggy took his place?

from what i saw today,i think big pav have a better chance to play as LW then luque

well,u make a good point...the whole pattison thing but he couldve brought huntington on Eariler..instead of going for rossi.. or he couldve replaced emre with luque,play him upfront,return sibreski to his original postion as a play maker,and keep zoggy at left back,he is more likley to defend then both pattison and luque wich he showed in the nice tackle.. also can u explain how come our brilliant first half peformence turned into a struggle to hold the defence in the seconed half,if it hadn't been for that given save,we wouldve been upset today.. anyway,a win is a win,and thats all that matters...

Explain simple he played milner out of postion,he is no nobby solano though pattison was a waste,he show a bit good stuff and a bit bad aswell,couldve sealed the win but his shot was horrible he couldve taken more advantage of them game,attack more instead of set back and defend,this season we lost two games by the score of 2-1 thanx to the fact that our seconed half if often very poor,today was not a day to bring the likes of rossi and pattison on,maybe giving luque who is more experinced some time wouldve been much better.. if brad friedel got his head to the ball that wouldve been a game to remember What did you want him to do soccer master? Taylor was struggling with an injury and that's why Huntingdon didn't come on immediately, so Milner dropped in to right back and Rossi on the wing. Sibierski then got an injury in a block challenge and then Huntington came on, went in to right back and Milner pushed on. Where's the problem? Or would you rather have had Luque at right back? not really,wouldve rather see him play at LW the pattison! also he is a winger,he couldve replaced solano and play at the right wing,sure he is left footed but so is rossi,who we won't even get anything from when he leaves in january of course bringing huntington on was the rite thing to do,thought he looked solid,we should give him more chances..

Explain simple he played milner out of postion,he is no nobby solano though pattison was a waste,he show a bit good stuff and a bit bad aswell,couldve sealed the win but his shot was horrible he couldve taken more advantage of them game,attack more instead of set back and defend,this season we lost two games by the score of 2-1 thanx to the fact that our seconed half if often very poor,today was not a day to bring the likes of rossi and pattison on,maybe giving luque who is more experinced some time wouldve been much better.. if brad friedel got his head to the ball that wouldve been a game to remember

draggon don't care about luque really,we won.. just joking about how roeder played: Rossi as RW Milner as RB Pattison as LW just so he keeps luque out we shouldve taken a bigger advantage on the one man diffence,its a win nevertheless

both goals were well taken,he did miss a few aswell,chances like that don't come too often vs teams like,lets say.. chelsea..

First-half diagnosis? Fantatstic,brilliant,all the players did the best they can Second-half diagnosis? horrible,shocking,got to see huntington Full-time diagnosis? Got lucky,again.. Star man for United? zoggy surley,maybe martins aswell,both ran their socks off Worst United player? the whole team in the seconed half Opposition comment? brad friedel should come out more often.. Toon-pros? martins,2 goals seeing roeder try every possible thing he can so he dosn't play luque Toon-cons? we nearly lost the 3 points thanx to roeder.. Post-match feelings? i am starting to think that maybe roeder hates luque..

i have to say its Duff's and carr's injurys just a look at our results after they got injured,and another look b4 they got injured says it all..

i meant to do that remember "Ameobi Knifed in colarado!!"

yea he looks kinda soft.. but he is 18,he is dutch,and he is a GK,a fantastic one.. and we didnt see him really showing if he have strengeth or not ...

simple topic really Why did our peformence changed suddenly i won't be like a certin someone and add a 20 reasons poll just leave it open,for anyone to say anything i mainly think its the injuries of the likes of Moore,Carr,Babayaro,Duff, those 4 were under-performing,runining any chance we had of doing something in a game.. also our fixture's list was fair,all of the teams we faced were beatable.. thoughts?

o and glenn roeder