Jump to content

timeEd32

Member
  • Posts

    9,964
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by timeEd32

  1. I mean look at the first half against Everton. They had two shots, one of which resulted in one of the greatest goals in the history of the league. xG of 0.09. Everton had 10 shots, four on target, 2 "big chances," and an xG of 1.43. They were thoroughly outplayed and on just about any other day probably would have trailed at halftime. I want to call it luck but Froggy will argue there's a skill in winning matches and I won't fully argue that. But their method of earning points this season is entirely unsustainable and it's driving me crazy. I hope we smash them this weekend.
  2. It is changing a bit when the new format begins next season. Participation is going up from 25% to 27.5% of the total. Prize money is increasing from 30 to 37.5%. TV Pool and Coefficient are being combined into one grouping that will make up the remaining 35% (which is 10% less than those two combined now). But as far as I know there are no details on how they are breaking this down and if that -10% is largely shifting later round TV money into prize money (which is essentially little change) or if they are actually reducing the financial benefit to a high coefficient, which to me is the most unfair part of the current distribution.
  3. TV money and coefficient are separate. You can add another £3.8m or so for our coefficient amount. That is irrespective of how far you advance so it won't change regardless. There's also a TV pool component, which has two parts. Half is based on where you finished in the league to qualify so we get the lowest of the English teams since we finished 4th. That amounts to ~£8.5m. The other half is dependent on how far you advance. For comparison, City get ~£30M for their coefficient and ~£16m for their initial TV pool payment.
  4. It's almost always there in the back of your mind when a goal goes in now. A good example was Wilson for the third against Brighton last season. I barely reacted as I was certain he'd be ruled offside. Bruno for the 4th was the opposite - pure euphoria like pre-VAR.
  5. I'm guessing VAR has properly fixed many more decisions than it has gotten wrong. The problem is when VAR intervenes and gets it wrong it usually seems so stupid and avoidable. They need to fix the process. (This is ignoring the very valid argument about it tarnishing the best thing about the sport - the goals and ensuing celebrations. I don't know what to do about that.)
  6. I'm wondering how he knows that, but if true that is fucking ridiculous. Honestly the biggest problem with VAR isn't the technology or even the humans involved necessarily. It's that the entire process, or lack thereof, appears to have been slapped together with little thought. The Liverpool error was because there's no defined process. The fact there isn't a clear outline about how many angles (i.e. all available), speeds, etc. need to be shown is ridiculous. The same goes for communication - who is talking and when? what words are being used?
  7. Yeah, they deserved a draw (or more). But they didn’t deserve that draw.
  8. I was with you until you said Friday Night Lights was tacky. Clear eyes, full hearts...
  9. Ha, I know. Dortmund are saints compared to these other two. But yes, I'd want us to go for it and would relentlessly defend the decision if it ended badly.
  10. If he had brought on some kids to see it out and they scored he'd be getting killed on here for that.
  11. Absolutely even without the solace of it fucking over those Parisian cheats.
  12. Agree, but should probably tell the rest of the team . Miley played a couple balls into space in the first half that he didn't even run after.
  13. If the other groups stay as is the difference between topping the group and 2nd for Dortmund is: Arsenal Madrid Sociedad Atletico City Barcelona OR Porto Lazio Inter Napoli PSV Copenhagen They should care.
  14. CBS has a rules analyst on explaining that this is the correct interpretation of the rule according to FIFA, even though no one likes it including referees. She thinks next season deflection and proximity will be part of the rule again and in that case this wouldn't be a pen. Carragher described it as awful decision.
  15. Need to beat Milan and need an already qualified Dortmund to help us. They do have something to play for though (top of the group).
  16. Shouldn't have been 8 minutes. Shouldn't have been a penalty. 2 points stolen.
×
×
  • Create New...