Anderson

If I'd only picked Gomez for his first two matches I'd have been out of sight. At least Ronaldo repaid my faith in him eventually.

£123 up from Rooney FGS and England bets.

SDBS should leapfrog you, can't see anyone else doing it though.

Me too. Rooney and Ronaldo coming up trumps this week has kept me in contention.

He got subbed off. They must have to play a certain amount of minutes to get the clean sheet. I still don't think I've had a clean-sheet in this yet.

I think Hodgson's got it spot on, especially where there's doubts over Walcott's fitness. In Walcott and Carroll we've got two decent, albeit very different, impact subs.

I've just realised that 'Power had a shocker' sounds like a lame pun. It wasn't intentional.

A horse jumped in front of him going around the corner...pretty harsh Possibly. Never looked like threatening though. Anyway, at least I got another £20 bet out of it. Nothing else for me today.

Power had a shocker.

How's that work? Surely if he's got a release clause they have no say in the matter?

There's absolutely no way Joseph O'Brien is 19, looks no older than about 12/13.

Worth mentioning that that 11 lengths victory was against a horse currently ranked 5th in the world. Ridiculous.

Sportingbet offering a free £20 bet if you place a £20 bet on your mobile on Royal Ascot. Stuck £10 EW on Power.

"No horse is a certainty", give over Henry.

Fuck sake man, that 9 lengths price was so tempting too.

11 lengths! Fuck. SkyBet were offering 9/1 for 9L or more.

What price was Excelebration w/o Frankel?

So, who printed the most money with that? Rey?

8 lengths.

Wish I'd got the Frankel/Caviar/Camelot treble at 2.6 when I could.

Imagine if he didn't win man.

1/10 now.

Asked again: Ronan: yes 3.25 will qualify Ronan: anything over 3 Ronan: Is there anything else I can assist you with? That daft twat Barry was wrong then. Going to stick a tenner on that and a fiver on the 5 lengths one. Not going to bother with any big bets on them to win outright.

Do they ever measure anything inbetween though? It's always x lengths isn't it? Never x and a half lengths, or whatever.

Aye, asked their live chat and you're right ("both horses have to win by more than 3 lengths, so 4 and above"). Think I'll have a tenner on the more speculative option. That's what I was thinking.