Anderson

Gives me £15 or so to play with on the footy later.

Last £2 of my free £5 going EW on Fennell Bay in the last race

Was that 50p overall btw? Or 50p x 30?

Been backed down to 16 now.

50p EW on Lord Ofthe Shadows.

Saddlers Rock. Just got in front of mine at the end.

If they interfere, will the stewards disqualify Colour Vision, or just knock him down a place?

Fuck, do you only get paid for 3 places? Unlucky, nearly managed to stay out in front. Nearly backed Dettori too, but didn't fancy a bigger bet.

£1 EW on Gulf of Naples for me.

Who's running this offer? I got a similar thing from SportingBet on the first day, but they seem to have stopped that it now.

Ouch. Done that many a time, but so far it's never cost me anything, only ever saved me money.

Actually, no, got confused. Princess Highway and Inchina have got similar colours.

66/1 shot romps home.

Had money on Vow and Twirl in the Oaks. Only got Vow this time, ergo Twirl will win.

Gone for a small bet on Vow EW.

http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/22317059.jpg

:lol:

I think one package (probably the smallest) should be like the highlights package and set aside for terrestrial broadcasters. It would help break up the Sky monopoly. Have the smallest package set aside for terrestrial TV and then also make it so at least 2 of the remaining packages are safe from whoever wins the most bids (Sky). No more than what Sky + BT is going to cost I'd imagine. May as well cut out the middle man for those two extra packages. Even keeping it on ESPN would've been preferable as they've already got other stuff (FA Cup and the UEFA).

Capitalists is another. :lol:

Well why do you keep complaining about it? 'Trade rules' seems to be your new buzzword(s) in this thread.

I'd rather just give them to whoever bids the most money (and thus gives us more money), if that means Sky get a monopoly on it, so be it. I'd rather Sky had every single game than the current Sky + a PPV channel (or premium channel, whatever).

I'd imagine it's got something to do with the multitude of silly questions you ask/complaints you make in this thread. Just a guess.

A treble of Germany to score first / Germany to score last / and Germany Clean sheet on BV gives odds of just under 2/1 which is better than the odds of around evens that you can get elsewhere for Germany to win to nil. That is of course unless I've missed some glaring loophole. The problem is BV are quite strict when it comes to placing "related" bets as accys. But I'll give it a go anyway. So is everywhere. You can very rarely pick two (or more) selections in a multiple that affect each other. Such as earlier you were complaining about them not accepting an 8 fold on stage of elimination, yet every selection would reduce or increase the odds of at least one other so there's no way you could place a bet like that. Still....... fucking chicken. Well, no. For example if you had Germany as winners in the 8 fold that would take Greece going out in the quarters for granted, so you couldn't then add the Greece to drop out at the quarters selection to the bet to increase it's odds. As for the Tennis bet, I don't know. Nadal reaching the final doesn't have any direct bearing on the top French or Argentinian player (or it might, has the draw for the whole tournament been made?), but I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't allow it. In my experience, Bet365 tend to be the most lenient with this sort of stuff, for example with the basketball, and other sports, they'll let you double up handicap bets and total points bets on the the same matches whereas most other places don't allow it