Spudil

I rekon we'll get Benitez and Rooney

I wasn't sure if he was a WUM but I think he's serious based on how much he's posting

Which argument is this? The only sane argument that anyone could possibly have for keeping Pardew. The only sane argument that anybody could possibly have for keeping Pardew if they had anything to say about the matter (i.e. if they were Mike Ashley) would be that he has overachieved last season, underachieved this, that there are mitigating circumstances to a certain extent and that he perhaps should be given more time to see what he can do next season. The stability argument hasn't come from any of the posters on here, it's come from that very same one person who indeed has the final say on the matter. It has came from posters on here though. If you're not a believer in stability (I am) then I see little reason why we shouldn't get rid now and try some fresh ideas, if it doesn't work then it doesn't matter, we can just give them the chop and bring in another man. Try not to respond through the eyes of Mike Ashley, or at least what you perceive his thoughts to be, it's incredibly irritating and ultimately irrelevant to the debate of whether or not Pardew is good enough for our squad. Which posters have argued Pardew should remain our manager for the sake of stability out of interest? Aye I was wrong to laugh- HF hasn't used that argument oh here tbf. Plenty of others have though. Its become hard to attribute the correct opinion to each poster considering the clusterfuck this thread has been Nobody has ever used that argument, literally nobody.. What? The amount of times I've read "I'm willing to forgive X,Y and Z for the sake of stability..." If I had a quarter for every time ... POIDH Will some people please just confirm that the stability argument had been used on here countless times. I'm really not arsed digging up posts atm ffs.

Which argument is this? The only sane argument that anyone could possibly have for keeping Pardew. The only sane argument that anybody could possibly have for keeping Pardew if they had anything to say about the matter (i.e. if they were Mike Ashley) would be that he has overachieved last season, underachieved this, that there are mitigating circumstances to a certain extent and that he perhaps should be given more time to see what he can do next season. The stability argument hasn't come from any of the posters on here, it's come from that very same one person who indeed has the final say on the matter. It has came from posters on here though. If you're not a believer in stability (I am) then I see little reason why we shouldn't get rid now and try some fresh ideas, if it doesn't work then it doesn't matter, we can just give them the chop and bring in another man. Try not to respond through the eyes of Mike Ashley, or at least what you perceive his thoughts to be, it's incredibly irritating and ultimately irrelevant to the debate of whether or not Pardew is good enough for our squad. Which posters have argued Pardew should remain our manager for the sake of stability out of interest? Aye I was wrong to laugh- HF hasn't used that argument oh here tbf. Plenty of others have though. Its become hard to attribute the correct opinion to each poster considering the clusterfuck this thread has been Nobody has ever used that argument, literally nobody.. What? The amount of times I've read "I'm willing to forgive X,Y and Z for the sake of stability..." If I had a quarter for every time ...

Which argument is this? The only sane argument that anyone could possibly have for keeping Pardew. The only sane argument that anybody could possibly have for keeping Pardew if they had anything to say about the matter (i.e. if they were Mike Ashley) would be that he has overachieved last season, underachieved this, that there are mitigating circumstances to a certain extent and that he perhaps should be given more time to see what he can do next season. The stability argument hasn't come from any of the posters on here, it's come from that very same one person who indeed has the final say on the matter. It has came from posters on here though. If you're not a believer in stability (I am) then I see little reason why we shouldn't get rid now and try some fresh ideas, if it doesn't work then it doesn't matter, we can just give them the chop and bring in another man. Try not to respond through the eyes of Mike Ashley, or at least what you perceive his thoughts to be, it's incredibly irritating and ultimately irrelevant to the debate of whether or not Pardew is good enough for our squad. Which posters have argued Pardew should remain our manager for the sake of stability out of interest? Aye I was wrong to laugh- HF hasn't used that argument oh here tbf. Plenty of others have though. Its become hard to attribute the correct opinion to each poster considering the clusterfuck this thread has been

Not relevant as you well know. Swansea have been on holiday since winning a cup and qualifying for Europe ( the biggest achievements in their entire history. ) You will try to twist anything by presenting stats and data without context , are you a politician man?

Not at all like NUFC. Newly promoted NUFC...with Danny Simpson and Danny Guthrie....."The Force!!" Getafe had never once finished as low as they did under Laudrup in any season since they had been promoted. Newly promoted aye but with a Premiership squad, always in the premier league. The championship season was a blip as you well know and we very much remained a premier league club.

Wiki Not at all like NUFC. So the situations are not remotely comparable... So let's compare anyway: both got to the UFEA cup quarter finals and both finished not far from relegation. I think Laudrup wins this one without the blink of an eye.

Not wanting to change the awful manager our of fear it could be worse is just plain stupid. Yeah, this is the very same reason Pardew is a terrible manager.

Jose Bosingwa.

come on Benfica, an infinitely better club than Chelsea

HF is worse then your average politician for skirting around and often even completely ignoring points that detract from and falsify his arguments.

None of this is relevant. I never said Pardew sets us up really well and then changes it at half time. I'm saying he sets us up s*** all the time. It is a lie, it contradicts the fact of what our coaching staff have told us. Bold: No you did not. Here is what you said: Not the same at all. So? Ameobi has got to be one of the most used subs in the league. Most of the time Cisse stays on when Shola is subbed on so your point about Campell is null. He doesn't start because he's not a very good target man. If Pardew had a target man of slightly better quality he would start and he will push for one all summer.

1) "Passing and keeping possession and probing". Misleading PR bullshit (where did you learn that from?), especially the probing part, there was none or very little "probing". We are incapable of it. We had a decent amount of possession (mainly at the back) because West Brom were on holiday and put us under literally no pressure unless we approached their half/goal. Even the inept commentators mentioned this non stop. When they received the predictable bollocking at half time they spent the first ten minutes of the second half camped in our half and dominated the rest of the match. Quoting some select Newcastle fans from a forum as proof that we played well is utterly laughable for obvious reasons I'll leave you to ponder. 2) The part in bold is utter bullshit. It had been noted several times in the press, by word of mouth of our own coaching staff that Pardew spends 4 days working on shape, analyzing the oppositions strengths and defending against them and 1 day on attacking. So that's just a straight up lie. So what is it, massive coincidence or do our players have the worst concentration, discipline and fitness levels in the league? Pardew puts on Shola because our bold and silly players wont stop kicking it long. Not as if he's known to like a target man throughout his career or anything

Thats about it.

These last few pages have put me off posting. It's that bad. Every cloud.

Daily reminder.

These are your reasons for our long ball play? Goals scored or conceded? The game 'getting on'? and the opposition taking it up a notch. losing shape, tiredness. But not Alan Pardew. Every one of 19th teams below us in the long table are subject to the conditions you give. And yet they are all below us in the long ball table. Coincidence? I don't think he does though. Perhaps when we string 5 passes together at the back under no pressure when the opposition are asleep (like the 1st half Vs. West Brom) that constitutes Pardew seeing us play "reasonably good stuff" for you but not for me.

Aye and we just happen to do this the most out of every single team in the league. What a coincidence that Alan f***ing Pardew is our manager. Notice how Happy Face conveniently ignores posts he finds uncomfortable to answer. As much a fraud as a poster as our fraud of a manager.

What is it then HappyFace, massive coincidence or do our players have the worst concentration levels in the league?

Aye and we just happen to do this the most out of every single team in the league. What a coincidence that Alan fucking Pardew is our manager.

This is what HappyFace actually believes. Why does Pardew set us so differently in the first half of games to the second half of games in your opinion? I don't think there's a massive difference in the way we're set up either side of half time besides becoming gradually more negative as the game goes on providing we haven't gone behind. Even then, we sometimes have become more negative and gone for damage limitation. What's that got to do with your post though? It's an utterly terrible post.

Aye of course it is. This is what HappyFace actually believes.

Is mongs on the banned list? Can I get this one referred please? I think we should probably pick this discussion back up when you've regained control of your emotions. Take all the time you need.