Jump to content

Doops

Member
  • Posts

    383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. At least it's done quickly before any business really begins. Gets rid of any conflict or debate slowing down the process of building for next season. Hopefully that's everyone aligned now to go out and get what's needed. Compromised decisions are probably not what's required.
  2. Because it's a quite counter attacking setup not suited to pressing up the pitch against average sides. Only works against the attacking teams imho
  3. Can't be playing 3 centre backs at home to Everton man. Get another CM on and push onto them
  4. Bellingham played really well, looks better than I thought he was
  5. Not much in it, took a lazy mistake for them to really trouble us. Their goalkeeper getting motm says it all
  6. Gordon is an absolute liability
  7. My point was BDB has played left back countless times and only Gordon would be asked to play in the position that willock would have but I can see either happening
  8. That's what I thought straight away but could be totally wrong. Gordon would arguably get through more work than him anyway and Gordon and Barnes doubling up on the left sounds unstoppable to me.
  9. I thought he might go for Gordon in the willock role to limit totally changing everything around. That would have most playing in a position they're used to
  10. McGinn clapping the 3 Villa fans who didn't desert them
  11. Never Sarr it coming 👀
  12. Munoz has some engine on him
  13. Doubt it, they lost 3 times this season to Palace before this lol
×
×
  • Create New...