Hanshithispantz

last kick of the game

His gameplan. (please don't get pissed, i'm mesisng with you now) Eh? I've never been pissed during this conversation (mood wise anyway), and it actually is his gameplan by the looks of things at the moment

Mourinho having to gee those fucking pathetic cunts up.

Chelsea have stifled Munich well and looked dangerous in attack themselves, that was their gameplan and it's worked so far, that's all I've said Munich are looking more dangerous now, aye.

No.

They've been the better side by quite a bit. More possession, more shots on goal, more goal attempts and the ball is rarely in their half. All this of course means the square root of f*** all. End of discussion. We won't agree. I like football, you like defending. Ah man divn't make me cringe with shite like that I would accept you football ( ) if Bayer Munich's possession and shots at goal if they looked like they were going to amount to anything but they haven't. Chelsea look fairly comfortable, even with 10 men, no matter how shit it looks. Chelsea's game plan is working, hence why I think they've been the better side, they've hardly been lucky.

They've been the better side by quite a bit. More possession, more shots on goal, more goal attempts and the ball is rarely in their half. All this of course means the square root of fuck all.

How? I'm confused as to how Bayern have been the BETTER side? They've probably had a fucking load of possession but Chelsea have defended well and have looked the most dangerous in front of goal.

Chelsea have been the better side imo, defended well and they look dangerous when they come forward.

thanks

What about if Beckham is playing for Real Madrid at the time? *grabs coat; jumps off bridge*

1 goal win. Continuing with my blind optimism.

Tottenham look fucking class this season like, jealous of everything about them.

This, I think he's an excellent wildcard for us to play. I'd play him tomorrow in the hole with 2 of Anita, Cabaye and Sissoko behind.

Any chance of a recap? Saw something in someone's sig but I haven't seen anything else depressing. Was he a credible ITK though? The calling of Pardew makes Golfmag a very credible ITK, probably the best ever. I do find it hard to get hold of the reducing of costs/wages etc. I just don't think he has any say in that. Other than that.... He's the direct link between the players and the board so he has a massive say tbh. It's pretty widely accepted that Hughton was sacked because he was too pally with the players and would stick up for them when needed. He has a massive say on wages that are written into the players contracts? I don't think he has anything like that sort of influence. Nobody has said that, have they? The manager can have a massive say on the clubs overall spending though, aye. If he has a backbone and kicks up a fuss about a lack of spending, or throws in an ultimatum if his players are sold etc, something that Pardew will never do. He's a yes man. I quote "Part of Pardew's remuneration is based on how much the club's operating expenses (wge costs for him) are reduced. " So yes someone has said that tbh, and I don't think he has any say on players' wages. None of that is suggesting that he has a say on player wages though, it's suggesting that part of the reason he was hired was to help reduce the clubs operating expenses. Which doesn't necessarily imply that he has a direct say on player wages. I don't see how he can have a contract where he is remunerated for something he doesn't control. I am not in any way disputing that Golfmag was ITK by the way, clearly he was. I just don't think AP controls any of the clubs operating expenses. I don't think debate will resolve it - maybe we have to agree to differ. Aye fair enough, I just took it as Pardew's wages (or bonuses) are dependent on the clubs operating expenses, which would give him an incentive to want to move players on for big profit and get rid of any high earners. He's signed a new contract since then so it might be completely irrelevant in any case.

In that case we'll sell Cabaye for less than £15m before deadline day. If the sole aim is to sell at a profit then even £11m would be a good return. Nobody has actually said this In the post that I quoted Icarus said "We've been told by a reliable source that part of Pardew's job remit is to recoup money from players" So as I said, nobody has actually said that

In that case we'll sell Cabaye for less than £15m before deadline day. If the sole aim is to sell at a profit then even £11m would be a good return. Nobody has actually said this

Any chance of a recap? Saw something in someone's sig but I haven't seen anything else depressing. Was he a credible ITK though? The calling of Pardew makes Golfmag a very credible ITK, probably the best ever. I do find it hard to get hold of the reducing of costs/wages etc. I just don't think he has any say in that. Other than that.... He's the direct link between the players and the board so he has a massive say tbh. It's pretty widely accepted that Hughton was sacked because he was too pally with the players and would stick up for them when needed. He has a massive say on wages that are written into the players contracts? I don't think he has anything like that sort of influence. Nobody has said that, have they? The manager can have a massive say on the clubs overall spending though, aye. If he has a backbone and kicks up a fuss about a lack of spending, or throws in an ultimatum if his players are sold etc, something that Pardew will never do. He's a yes man. I quote "Part of Pardew's remuneration is based on how much the club's operating expenses (wge costs for him) are reduced. " So yes someone has said that tbh, and I don't think he has any say on players' wages. None of that is suggesting that he has a say on player wages though, it's suggesting that part of the reason he was hired was to help reduce the clubs operating expenses. Which doesn't necessarily imply that he has a direct say on player wages.

Any chance of a recap? Saw something in someone's sig but I haven't seen anything else depressing. Was he a credible ITK though? The calling of Pardew makes Golfmag a very credible ITK, probably the best ever. I do find it hard to get hold of the reducing of costs/wages etc. I just don't think he has any say in that. Other than that.... He's the direct link between the players and the board so he has a massive say tbh. It's pretty widely accepted that Hughton was sacked because he was too pally with the players and would stick up for them when needed. He has a massive say on wages that are written into the players contracts? I don't think he has anything like that sort of influence. Nobody has said that, have they? The manager can have a massive say on the clubs overall spending though, aye. If he has a backbone and kicks up a fuss about a lack of spending, or throws in an ultimatum if his players are sold etc, something that Pardew will never do. He's a yes man.

Any chance of a recap? Saw something in someone's sig but I haven't seen anything else depressing. Was he a credible ITK though? The calling of Pardew makes Golfmag a very credible ITK, probably the best ever. I do find it hard to get hold of the reducing of costs/wages etc. I just don't think he has any say in that. Other than that.... He's the direct link between the players and the board so he has a massive say tbh. It's pretty widely accepted that Hughton was sacked because he was too pally with the players and would stick up for them when needed. What Golf Mag said fits, Pardew was brought in and given the best job he'll ever have because he's willing to do whatever the owner says, even at the cost of his own squad. He'd love to keep his players and for Mike to spend some cash but he'll not kick up a fuss about it.

Golf Mag is the man.

Messi sounds like fucking Ivan Drago.

Wey of course, otherwise you would have used "us" instead of "you".

3 days to flog Hatem Ben Arfa.