Jump to content

1964

Member
  • Posts

    3,331
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1964

  1. I'll be happy to never read another ludicrously contrived Interpretation of a Nick de Marco tweet
  2. 1964

    Joe Willock

    Been referred to VAR, decision expected before December
  3. 1964

    Transfer rumours

    Everton fans do not rate Davies, too slow and too shit
  4. So the CAT case will fail in your opinion?
  5. If the Saudis do walk away and the CAT case runs, would this not form part of the case against the PL, i.e. they have literally been the causation of a failed 300m deal. Would the sanction not be commensurate? Or am I talking bollocks?
  6. Staveley's limbless torso outside the gallowgate, holding a sharwarma wrap in her gob and threatening passers by
  7. The Black Knight from monty python looms large in here, no matter how many fatal blows he takes, there is still a belief he will win
  8. Jordan is clearly not as clever as he thinks he is. The PL could never unequivocally prove that SA government is not involved in piracy because its impossible to prove a negative. The burden of proof would be on the PL to prove it is. The fucking moron!
  9. Last Friday in August at 3.00pm?
  10. Is the Newcastle saga likely to impact that really tho? Genuine question btw, I know the Arab nation hold a great deal of weight to honour and may see this as a sleight but similarly they need to invest in the west as much as we need investment, so they could well just move on quickly. I know they've stuck it out thus far but would losing it mean a great deal to their overall investment portfolio or their reputation, it's hardly front page news?
  11. It's also my birthday, so get this done
  12. The difference is though they are neither side of the contract, I think its reasonable to ask for transparency in a process whereby they are the governance and set the rules
  13. Yeah it's seems incredible that in even now in 1974 you can get it so wrong
  14. There's no fucking about in the euros, does it look onside, yes give it, no dont. No endless forensic study of armpit hair, other than 2 shit penalties not overturned its been good
  15. Can you use an out of court settlement offer as evidence? I doubt it aren't they usually prefaced with a phrase like 'without prejudice' to stop that? Could be talking out of my hoop however
  16. I would pay money to see Masters sired in public
  17. I must admit I thought he was making it up as I've been in Parliament St many times and it's largely open plan. My guess is that it's a small team as I've also never come across international relations people, uts certainly not a hub involved in multi million £ take overs
  18. I'll choose not to believe that, primarily because its horse shit. As someone who has walked those halls, there is no international government relations room FFS!!!
×
×
  • Create New...