r0cafella

Man united sold who to domestic rivals? Chelsea sold which world class player to domestic rivals? Barca got embarrassed by figo for sure and did you see how the fans reacted?

150m is fuck all when the replacement who isn't close is 80m Entire profit of the deal spent on someone worst, not sure where people see the fantastic deal.

We do man, if he was promised we sell him this is the first thing that would have come out. This hasn't been mentioned at all. It's just ki saying maybe this happened as he's gone to bat for Eddie's comments. You know this man.

The other way leads to us being food. As long as your aware of that it's all good.

My underlying point is in case it's been lost. Once someone like Isak devices unilaterally they are going to create a situation such as this you can never give in. Players will come and go what I'm writing isn't based on emotion naturally I'm passionate as we all are. Players and agents we deal with must understand that win wins have to created for sales to possible, we work together to find solutions, you do not go on strike as this will push us to take a position which prevents you from achieving your own goal.

Yes but again said conversation hasn't happened and trump's touched children but here we are. The point being even if this were so, it obviously isn't it would need something along the lines of we verbally agree to sell you for x price.

Respect you opinion brother I really do. I wouldn't ever sell a player for a club who's unsettled him.

Not a lawyer but it seems that would be extremely difficult case for him to win and the scenario seems off as we would have heard he promised we would let him go as we have Wissa. Ki has a love for Eddie which is unmatched no matter what the gaffa says Ki will always be ready to activate for him. I say this respectfully as well.

No, he's gone but a savvy clubs tells him to sit down and find a solution that works for all and not just for him. Instead we are scrambling around trying to replace him with players who are far inferior for massive money because we want to peddle him and give him what he wants. He can be binned next summer on our terms not this summer on his.

It's not often legit world class players literally best in slot players are sold, and they especially aren't usually sold to clubs in the same league under these circumstances we'll run clubs generally don't allow for it. I don't believe we get 150m out of Liverpool they give us slightly more than they did for Wirtz which is hilariously bad given any metric of comparison.

Kanji man, we as a club are wet behind the ears. We are very naive.

Why would the club be liable for damages? He doesn't have any grounds for any claim against us. He signed a contract.

Ki man, we don't need to say anything. We tell the player and his representatives clearly. You can go but the way you've gone about this is obviously incorrect and has the opposite of desired affect. Previously we were ok to let you to at 150m now it's 200m. Please reach out when you have someone willing to pay the price. You do not make a stand by answering questions of journalist and telling the world well we can't really make him stay

Because he wants him gone man, and Eddie is super human but hiding contempt is really hard. Press officer is a mug we shouldn't be entertaining any questions about Isak. If the club wants to communicate it should be via official statements.

Repeating myself now. We are getting a below market fee for someone who is legit world class. Someone who we didn't want to sell and the money is coming from the club who've tapped him up. It's not even optics, it's strengthening a rival, it's cucking ourselves, it's making ourselves weaker and it's sending a clear message to anyone who has eyes and a functioning brain. We are not a serious club come and get out best players even those who are not for sale.

If people agree with Eddie's stance it's fine like, I think it's wet as fuck personally and obviously not the only way we can handle it. Mans basically run it the white flag.

No such agreement has been mentioned anywhere isak would have leaked this long by now. And even if this was the case legal action would take years to resolve so it's basically worthless at the stage. Id like to take the time to remind everyone Liverpool literally rejected an offer for Suarez which triggered his release clause, they didn't give a fuck.

It's quite obvious no? Liverpool have tapped the player up and embarked on a campaign through the media to unsettle our player not once but twice. If you don't make a stand you embolden then as you've demonstrated this tactic works. It's not rocket science.

Legal reason? Such as? Any legal action would take a very long time to resolve itself and we can Bankrupt the twerp. Bring the legal action in here for it.

Too bad that isn't going to happen and it's still a bad outcome as you've given everyone a blueprint on how to buy your best players at market value. Important to remember Isak has been not for sale all summer.

It's obviously not true is why your conflicted We can obviously force him to stay, the ground is being prepared.

If we sell to Liverpool we've rolled over btw. Absolutely zero excuses for it.

This whole attractive with players nonsense is really grating like, as with most things it's very simple. Are we the players best option in terms of the current club he's at is smaller than ours and we are willing to pay more? Then he will join us. Are cartel clubs involved? Then player won't join us. It's much more important we send the correct message our and not roll over for the cartel.

Talk is cheap

Bad isak isn't replaceable if we are being honest so him kicking off like this was always going to be damaging.