r0cafella

If we are prepared for Ashworth to rot, then the approach we take should be as mentioned before, every time Sir Jim opens his mouth the price goes up by another million. Let’s run it up.

Doesn’t he have 4 years left? Are we going to pull another master stroke and extend with a release clause?

Source is Bein Ben, so can safely ignore. I’m not sure where this 80m figure comes from when the clause is 100 too.

They probably can to be fair, the big 6 FFP issues and ours aren’t really comparable because they have so much the new rules will further solidify that too.

Will sesko settle for being a rotation option at a Europa league side?

In terms of FFP totally fine. They have massive revenues and that sweet harry Kane FFP margin. For spurs, the issue has generally been the owners don’t spend up to the limit iirc.

Oh, I’ve read all those quotes from those firms before, on here as well I’m sure. I commented not long ago that populous keep pitching for the job That being said, fair play I’m glad you found it worthwhile.

The article is just everything that’s been discussed on here. Let’s see in a couple of weeks when the study is released.

They are meant to be but they have players who they can offload for decent fees ESR probably being the prime candidate. Also the new FFP rules are great for Arsenal when they come in.

Indeed it can’t, whatever is decided we will have a lot of unhappy people mind.

I think we know expansion is possible, it’s just expensive for what we get and doesn’t resolve issues regarding lack of facilities/ opening new revenue streams.

Haha, personally I don’t think we will go for a Cm this summer, if we do though I’d imagine it’d because Bruno has gone.

Chelsea are meant to want 50m for him, paying that for what would be a squad player would obviously be madness. Let’s focus on resources on area we are more in need of.

The fact they did the same with Rice last year is probably why they feel so entitled.

Isn’t that what Tonali is?

Conor Gallagher could never replace what Bruno gives us.

For sure, I mean his piece is obviously a pre cursor to it and speculating regarding the outcome. I hope they publish the study so we can all draw our own conclusions as well.

Thanks for sharing but nothing which hasn’t been debated endlessly since on here.

It’s that time of year where the press pick random name and pick random number and put them in a sentence, I wouldn’t worry too much.

Paul Mitchell seems a good fit on the face of it. Only potential negative is the amount of jobs he’s had, could end up back in an Ashworth situation

Gallagher would be such a poor use of our limited resources.

This is obviously false, FFP is the great protector which stops clubs from going bust.

I think we need to make a distinction here; FMV is only a thing for related party transactions, anything which isn’t related party would be deemed FMV by default. So, although Fabinho was an overpay in my opinion, in actuality he went for his actual value which was what some mug was willing to pay. For ASM, his transfer with obviously influence by FMV, but with that being said, we didn’t get any better offers.

Me too, we need him to shine so can we cash in.

Aye, giving Manchester another tax payer funded stadium has to be an absolute no go in the eyes of any government. It makes literally no sense and provides tax payers with zero value.