magpie1892

OMFG. What manner of cuntishness is this?

This is absolutely right. Burnley finished 2nd in an awful league and haven't added PL quality. Agreed. Burnley don't even have the athleticism and ability in defence to properly park the bus. One thing I've noticed about the Chelsea team is that I'm not sure where they will fit Fabregas against the bigger teams. Even in this match, there have been a few times where he has shirked defensively responsibility. Maybe drop Oscar and add one of the Black defensive midfielders. City have gotten the most impressive result among the title contenders thus far. Chelsea have been far more convincing than City for me even taking into account it's Burnley. Totally.

There will be a few going up on eBay in the near future if you're interested. Let me know when they will. I want this shirt, I just can't have Wonga on it. PM'd you.

There will be a few going up on eBay in the near future if you're interested.

There is a fair few number of people who collect them, and don't want any gaps no matter how s*** they are. I have bought the majority of the Puma shirts as soon as they go out of date and down to £11 on Cuntley's tatdirect.com I also indulge in a bit of customisation. http://s25.postimg.org/4i2fwybuz/DSCF7895.jpg I'm a collector myself no matter how s**** I generally buy the shirt. I think I have every home shirt from 93/94 up to now. Loving the customisation btw Why thank you. Trickier than you might imagine to get it like that!

There is a fair few number of people who collect them, and don't want any gaps no matter how s*** they are. I have bought the majority of the Puma shirts as soon as they go out of date and down to £11 on Cuntley's tatdirect.com I also indulge in a bit of customisation. http://s25.postimg.org/4i2fwybuz/DSCF7895.jpg

The customer gets a range of options from which to choose in terms of design, build complexity (and hence time expended to make the shirt), weight of material and, of course, the crest. I've not inspected it personally, but I'm led to believe that our grey away shirt doesn't have any 'breathable' aspects or perforated side panels and suchlike? This is why the players all looked like they'd been in the sauna in pics from the pre-season games. We've ended up with an iron-on crest not because of Puma's say-so, but because Cuntley has chosen the cheapest option in all areas where a choice is offered. The shirts are supplied at a lower retail cost, so Cuntley's margins are higher. I collect football shirts and I've got some really nice Puma shirts in my extensive wardrobe. One of the Angola shirts I have is in a thicker, heavier material in a beautiful, simple, deep red. The crest is embroidered and the puma logos are the natty and thick rubber ones in yellow, providing a little bit of contrast. They ARE capable of producing decent shirts, but if the client asks for the nastiest, cheapest s*** available, then that's what they get; Puma doesn't have the same reputation to uphold as the likes of adidas.

Rich man allows club to invest some of its money, and trousers the rest the fucking beached whale cunt.

Aye, reincarnated Jack the Ripper, Harold Shipman, Fred West and The Boston strangler all at the same time, the greedy c***. Missed off Hitler. Hitler played quite an attacking formation as I remember. Superb, sweeping moves into the opposition's danger areas in the early part of the season, but his sides tended to flag badly after the winter.

What a fucking disgusting excuse for a human being. Vile, just vile.

He's on a decent wedge and reckons he can outlast Pardew? I think he might be right.

God, that makes for depressing viewing.

Maybe because he used to play for Rangers?

f***ing hell, same here. Worst realization for me is that I'm going to be well into my 40s before I can attend a world cup. Bearing in mind, f*** Russia & f*** Qatar. Fingers crossed FIFA steals it from Qatar and gives it to the U.S. Otherwise it's gonna be a long time, as 2026 will probably go to some other shithouse country, f***ing Bolivia or something. It'll have to be Oz if they take it off Qatar surely? They were in the running too right with the us? I think they'd take the easier option of keeping it in the same federation. I'll be in my 50's if not. Christ. The justification for the US is that they basically don't have to do anything to be able to host it, would this apply for Australia? Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sports_venues_in_Australia I'm not 100% certain that a list of stadiums in Australia constitutes a concrete answer to the question. I am. We already know they have the transport infrastructure, the capacity for fans' influx, a domestic league growing in popularity, are sports mad, staged arguably the best olympics of all time and they have the stadiums - as well as the ability and finance to upgrade if necessary.

f***ing hell, same here. Worst realization for me is that I'm going to be well into my 40s before I can attend a world cup. Bearing in mind, f*** Russia & f*** Qatar. Fingers crossed FIFA steals it from Qatar and gives it to the U.S. Otherwise it's gonna be a long time, as 2026 will probably go to some other shithouse country, f***ing Bolivia or something. It'll have to be Oz if they take it off Qatar surely? They were in the running too right with the us? I think they'd take the easier option of keeping it in the same federation. I'll be in my 50's if not. Christ. The justification for the US is that they basically don't have to do anything to be able to host it, would this apply for Australia? Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sports_venues_in_Australia

Same here. I hate seeing us lose, but anything is better than having this cock in charge Same here also. I know that it will be simplicity itself to reconnect properly with the club when the two cu nts are gone.

The comments posted were in response to something about Pardew and were in defence of Pardew, funnily enough they were posted in the Pardew thread. Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean it's not intelligent. We all know just because it's the AP thread not every comment is relevant to him and and the one I commented on and especially the points I highlighted I agreed with were about MA and no Top manager wanting to work for us... The fact that you do all actually agree with me and yet you all seem to think you don't is where I get my concerns about the lack of intelligence been shown... I'll leave you to it... 2nd time you've said that. Please... just... go...

I can't see any reference to us getting a top manager in the quote you agree with, what's your point? How was he stitched up by Hall & Shepherd? He stitched himself up by rushing into buying the club, he stitched himself up by not even doing basic checks like using Google to find out who owned the ground because all of us knew that we didn't own it. We had a thread on here about debt and I think we had discussed just about everything that was classed as debt. We all knew how Michael Owen was being paid for and that was the only thing they didn't know apart from the loan which we had discussed to death on here so it was public knowledge. I think most would agree with that minor point, a minor point which had nothing to do with what Disco had originally said. It's not a point which should be used to justify anybody being happy with Pardew or a reason why anybody should be willing to accept his position at the club. That's happening now, I don't think "could" even comes into it. We're an advertising billboard for his shitty brand and the only reason he'll allow the club to use it's own money is to keep us in the Premiership and that is because of the cost of relegation and no more. Again, what has the comment got to do with the original point regarding Pardew? He could decide to sell at any time. Again, what has that got to do with Pardew? Wrong, talking about Pardew on here went a long way towards what happened in our last home game. Talk on here was enough to have banners produced and a walk out. Talk on here was probably the seed that ended up in Pardew sitting in the dugout because he was boo'd every time he stood up. None of my comments have anything to do with AP... I've made this clear in my subsequent posts... I simply came into this thread and noticed someone had quoted someone else talking about MA and what he thought he was going to do with the club and I agreed with it by and large and since then I've subsequently misquoted and misinterpreted and attacked by people who've made comments which are by and large the same comments I've made and agree with yet somehow they think are making opposing remarks when they are not... Then to top it off you've went to a lot of trouble to break down my comments as if they are in relation to AP when none of them were... This is obviously not the thread for reasoned and intelligent debate so on that note I'll leave you all to fall out agreeing with yourselves... I hope you mean that.

I think we all agree with that on this (last) page... It certainly wasn't what I was arguing... People need to read more closely and digest before replying at times... Hence why I use ellipses to help clarify... You state: "I agree that once he's done (got his money back) that his intentions could be to use us as a cash/advertising cow for himself and SD..." this is troubling, as myself and others contend that he's most certainly got his money back and has, for some time, been usong the club as a cash cow and billboard for s*** Direct and his tatty brands. Look at St James' Park FFS - it certainly concentrates the mind on the football/abusing Pardew; looking at the interior of the stadium makes me feel slightly queasy. I think what is disturbing is firstly you quoting me "..." But amending what I said... Secondly what is disturbing is you making the same point again and still mis-reading what I said... And thirdly that you are arguing with someone who is agreeing with you and saying the same thing... "I agree that once he's done that his intentions could be to use us as a cash/advertising cow for himself and SD... I agree he could also decide to just sell up after making balance sheet look as good as possible..." Read that and you will see that I'm in agreement with you... I don't see how you fail to understand that... He may have recouped his money already as others have suggested... That was not the point I was making though it was his intentions of what he will do with the club when he has... You say 'once' he's got his money back, I say he has already, and then some. I don't think that's the same argument at all. You also suggest - using the future tense - that he's going to use NUFC as a cash cow/billboard. I say he's doing that already, and then some (again). I'm not sure we're in agreement, but it's not especially important.

I think we all agree with that on this (last) page... It certainly wasn't what I was arguing... People need to read more closely and digest before replying at times... Hence why I use ellipses to help clarify... You state: "I agree that once he's done (got his money back) that his intentions could be to use us as a cash/advertising cow for himself and SD..." this is troubling, as myself and others contend that he's most certainly got his money back and has, for some time, been usong the club as a cash cow and billboard for Shit Direct and his tatty brands. Look at St James' Park FFS - it certainly concentrates the mind on the football/abusing Pardew; looking at the interior of the stadium makes me feel slightly queasy.

You agree with the bits about Ashley 'getting his money back' and the hitherto-unknown 'hidden debt'? I agree we are tied into a loveless marriage of sorts until he recovers the money he paid to buy the club and keep it afloat... I agree that once he's done that his intentions could be to use us as a cash/advertising cow for himself and SD... I contend that he long since recovered the monies he paid to buy the club and its inherent debt. I contend that he has for some time already been using the club as a cash cow and showcase for his scummy brands. Look at this years shirts for God's sake - the cheapest, nastiest selections from the Puma option book (stick on crest - embarrassing don't cover it) -and the largest margin for Fatty. I'd also be keen to learn your thoughts on this mysterious 'hidden debt' What is it? How much is it? Where did it come from? What measurements are in place to pay it back? (TV money from last season? Net, we've spent next to nothing this close season. I contend that you're defending the indefensible.

You agree with the bits about Ashley 'getting his money back' and the hitherto-unknown 'hidden debt'?

"We have an owner who was mugged by Hall and Shepherd who now wants his money back. He's going to keep a tight rein on transfers and wages until he recovers the hidden debt" Beautiful in its sweeping ignorance.

Again.

Dunno like. Ashley will know just as well as the rest of us how utterly gash Pardew is as a manager, and a man. This talk of CL and top six, etc. is just to try and sell tickets. There is no target other than Prem survival. 17th would be a successful season as far as Ashley is concerned. I think even Pardew can manage that with the squad we have, and as such, his job is safe.