Bimpy474

Official site want £2.95 to watch this, nah you're alright you cunts.

I think Edward John Frank Howe is having an affair with Gallowgate’s missus? He does seemed to have annoyed him somewhat

Fuck yeah it was blatant, funny watching O'Neill jumping up and down like a demented headcase though

For the love of tits, what is going on in here ? :lol:

Aye

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/support-martin-dubravka-explaining-chronicle-15824856 The Chronicle try to explain it here.

Pogba like.

Fantastic dive by Dwight for W.B.A to win and score a penalty Cheating git.

Our Jacob scoring for W.B.A.

The young moron who is my GK posted that shite in our football team Whatsapp group, gave him a proper bollocking.

Aye, while not going overboard he has better long passes off either foot, so much potential there.

We got a penalty, we took it but there was encroachment meaning it should have been retaken, the ref Keith Stroud gave a free kick to the opposition instead, not even understanding a basic law of the game, and at no stage did either lino or 4th official say anything. Bizarre at the time and still is now.

Nearly every team on that list wants to win, not to just exist. We live a zombie life as a club where our owner actively tries not to win things, or even try to.

Aye he's made an error or two but he's by far the best GK we've had for a long while. He's not suddenly a crap keeper, stick by him imo, he's mint.

We made a sub in time-on, which is an automatic 30 second addition. You could see the ref look at his watch in the 94th minute (the commentators mentioned it) and think "one more phase" - perhaps that decision is questionable but the refs union would agree 100% with that decision. The goal went in at 94.37 didn't it? 7 seconds "over". Whether it's a foul or not, whether Almiron was fouled or not, whether Moutinho should have been on the pitch - these are all different questions. But I don't think we can quibble with the time-on. One more phase ? As much as I want rugby style officiating in football that's too much. A ref isn't going to blow the final whistle when one team is almost in the other team's box like Well i refereed with two watches, watch one set at 45 minutes with an alarm to tell me 45 minutes we're up, the 2nd running the same but with any hold up in play i would pause this watch and restart it as the game did. As soon as watch one went off i would switch to the watch two, and as soon as that watch went off if there were no more delays, i blew up. I always blew no matter where the ball was, exactly as it should be imo, time was up when time was up. Luckily i never had anybody going in on goal one on one, or as a ball was about to go in the goal. I never had to adjust or think about that, as i said luckily, even then i would have blown when the watch 2 went off, well i reckon anyway

Because we don't have a game for 12 days ?

RIP, proper legend.

Sterry is at Crewe on loan now mate.

I don't buy there being some big conspiracy against us at all. We don't get pens because we don't spend much time in our opponent's box. Hopefully this changes now Almiron's here. What about the all the red card decisions, what's the reason we don't get them then? Which ones? We get just as many the other way. Lascelles should've been sent off at least twice this season, especially for that two-footer And Kenedy's at Cardiff, which even after a panel looked at it decided it wasn't a red I also don't think there's any conspiracy, but we certainly don't get the rub of green in our favour that's for sure. Panel didn't look at it, ref gave decision inside the game. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/45247739 Ah right Point still stands mind, ridiculous he didn't get a ban. Yeap. Same with Shelvey vs Man Utd. Oh yeah forgot that one.

I don't buy there being some big conspiracy against us at all. We don't get pens because we don't spend much time in our opponent's box. Hopefully this changes now Almiron's here. What about the all the red card decisions, what's the reason we don't get them then? Which ones? We get just as many the other way. Lascelles should've been sent off at least twice this season, especially for that two-footer And Kenedy's at Cardiff, which even after a panel looked at it decided it wasn't a red I also don't think there's any conspiracy, but we certainly don't get the rub of green in our favour that's for sure. Panel didn't look at it, ref gave decision inside the game. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/45247739 Ah right Point still stands mind, ridiculous he didn't get a ban.

The way they seem to use slo-mo, I’m more inclined to think they’d sway towards the foul. Very good point like.

I don't buy there being some big conspiracy against us at all. We don't get pens because we don't spend much time in our opponent's box. Hopefully this changes now Almiron's here. What about the all the red card decisions, what's the reason we don't get them then? Which ones? We get just as many the other way. Lascelles should've been sent off at least twice this season, especially for that two-footer And Kenedy's at Cardiff, which even after a panel looked at it decided it wasn't a red I also don't think there's any conspiracy, but we certainly don't get the rub of green in our favour that's for sure.

I went 7, actually meant 4 Note to self, wear your glasses all the time you fucking idiot.

Agree with this. He looked assured bar the odd time he came for it and then backtracked. Handling was really good. Then that in the 95th minute. He’s trying to relieve the pressure. They were getting a flurry of corners and crosses in, he’d been taking everything. If he’s not fouled he’s catches it, falls on top of the ball, launches it and it’s game over. Wasn't a foul though. Should have been though. If we're 1-0 down in the 95th minute and that happens down the other end of the pitch with Rondon and the goal gets disallowed everyone would be up in arms and saying it's a perfectly legitimate goal, which it was. If that happens down the other end, the foul WOULD be given. I don't think so. There's not a foul there to give. He gets up earlier than Dubravka and the Keeper makes a poor decision to try to catch it under pressure and is beaten to the ball. He's beaten to the ball because it goes through his hands due to Boly hitting his right arm and then leaving it on his face. Boly is up in the air first and in a completely natural heading movement. He's playing the ball not Dubravka. I dont think there's a rule in place that says the keeper cant be touched at all. • It is an offence to restrict the movement of the goalkeeper by unfairly impeding him I'll just add 'in the opinion of the merry whistle blower' who is in charge.

Aye, Schar should have blocked Boly off imo, foul or not.