Joey Linton

Actually playing with ten men now rather than just appearing to.

Was just catching up on the last few pages and was going to suggest restricting Whitley to the Braindead twitter thread. Just too late.

The takeover itself is dead in the water. The ongoing issue is between the club / owner and the Premier League and that's it. Not what people want to hear, but there it is.

Shelvey

Not really - most of the social media stuff has been positive - with the usual bashing from the usual suspects that love a moan on Twitter but have nothing constructive to say or offer. Well there's been enough for the Chronicle's multimedia editor to report on it via twitter which is where I saw it initially. Just seen you've responded to it on twitter too. Surprising you'd do that if it's "not really" happening.

They seem to be generating a fair bit of overdue criticism from both members and non members on social media today about what they do and claim to do.

You shouldn't, he's built himself a nice little following up, but that's it I'm afraid.

And now I think they’ve done it on purpose and in fact it is backed by the legal team and nick the baker is a genius. Boris is now sitting there thinking ‘these people speak my language, I must help my people’ Oh Joey if your going to be churlish and criticise other people for being incoherent, you need to make sure your spot on yourself. I would have thought some of the other highly intelligent posters on here who have criticised NCSL would have picked you up. That "that that" repetition is an infelicity that that author might have avoided with a bit of rewording so that that "that that" juxtaposition never found its way into print. Four words in before you f***ed up yourself. Amazing. https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/08/this-and-that.html Difference is I don’t criticise others like your good self. Except that that's ( ) exactly what you did do. You claimed the letter was a ramble and incoherent, then proceeded to write a sentence that was incoherent. Now that is that. Except my sentence wasn't incoherent at all, was it? Whereas the letter was undoubtedly all over the place, and your rant about me pointing that out was littered with grammatical errors. What's your link to the group here then? You clearly have one. What is it? What what joey lad ? Daft replies eh, because you've no answer. I’ve already said your sentence was incoherent, but I’ll repeat it again for your benefit. You do seem to like repeating things after all. You did, but repeating something which is incorrect doesn't make it correct. Doing it whilst littering your own post with grammatical errors just makes you look stupid too. Anyway, back on track with the thread, what is your link to this group you so vehemently defend? The vast majority have been critical of the letter, why not you?

And now I think they’ve done it on purpose and in fact it is backed by the legal team and nick the baker is a genius. Boris is now sitting there thinking ‘these people speak my language, I must help my people’ Oh Joey if your going to be churlish and criticise other people for being incoherent, you need to make sure your spot on yourself. I would have thought some of the other highly intelligent posters on here who have criticised NCSL would have picked you up. That "that that" repetition is an infelicity that that author might have avoided with a bit of rewording so that that "that that" juxtaposition never found its way into print. Four words in before you f***ed up yourself. Amazing. https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/08/this-and-that.html Difference is I don’t criticise others like your good self. Except that that's ( ) exactly what you did do. You claimed the letter was a ramble and incoherent, then proceeded to write a sentence that was incoherent. Now that is that. Except my sentence wasn't incoherent at all, was it? Whereas the letter was undoubtedly all over the place, and your rant about me pointing that out was littered with grammatical errors. What's your link to the group here then? You clearly have one. What is it? What what joey lad ? Daft replies eh, because you've no answer.

And now I think they’ve done it on purpose and in fact it is backed by the legal team and nick the baker is a genius. Boris is now sitting there thinking ‘these people speak my language, I must help my people’ Oh Joey if your going to be churlish and criticise other people for being incoherent, you need to make sure your spot on yourself. I would have thought some of the other highly intelligent posters on here who have criticised NCSL would have picked you up. That "that that" repetition is an infelicity that that author might have avoided with a bit of rewording so that that "that that" juxtaposition never found its way into print. Four words in before you f***ed up yourself. Amazing. https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/08/this-and-that.html Difference is I don’t criticise others like your good self. Except that that's ( ) exactly what you did do. You claimed the letter was a ramble and incoherent, then proceeded to write a sentence that was incoherent. Now that is that. Except my sentence wasn't incoherent at all, was it? Whereas the letter was undoubtedly all over the place, and your rant about me pointing that out was littered with grammatical errors. What's your link to the group here then? You clearly have one. What is it?

And now I think they’ve done it on purpose and in fact it is backed by the legal team and nick the baker is a genius. Boris is now sitting there thinking ‘these people speak my language, I must help my people’ Oh Joey if your going to be churlish and criticise other people for being incoherent, you need to make sure your spot on yourself. I would have thought some of the other highly intelligent posters on here who have criticised NCSL would have picked you up. That "that that" repetition is an infelicity that that author might have avoided with a bit of rewording so that that "that that" juxtaposition never found its way into print. Four words in before you f***ed up yourself. Amazing. https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/08/this-and-that.html Difference is I don’t criticise others like your good self. Except that that's ( ) exactly what you did do.

And now I think they’ve done it on purpose and in fact it is backed by the legal team and nick the baker is a genius. Boris is now sitting there thinking ‘these people speak my language, I must help my people’ Oh Joey if your going to be churlish and criticise other people for being incoherent, you need to make sure your spot on yourself. I would have thought some of the other highly intelligent posters on here who have criticised NCSL would have picked you up. That "that that" repetition is an infelicity that that author might have avoided with a bit of rewording so that that "that that" juxtaposition never found its way into print. Four words in before you f***ed up yourself. Amazing. https://www.grammarphobia.com/blog/2013/08/this-and-that.html

It's ironic that that god awful letter to the Prime Minister actually reads like a rambling, incoherent Boris Johnson speech.

"Steve, how's the bacon?"

Great mate Luke now attempting to distance great mate Steve from his own comments at the start of the season.

He's doing that Pardew thing where he's getting cross with questions which aren't even aggressive or difficult just because he wants to be annoyed. There was a great post match interview with Pardew (BBC maybe) where he was irate and picking a fight about a nothing question- think it was when he was with Palace.

Edwards writing and posting that in the hope of getting sympathy for Bruce. Loads in the replies saying "fine", "no problem", "wouldn't want him spending it anyway" etc etc

It's not really a disgrace like is it? Have they (The Trust) bothered to do anything useful with their survey results yet? Follow up action planned?

Members seem universally then. What next steps were offered for options of what members want the a trust to do about making those unanimous voices heard?

If these are refusing to get involved in any of the takeover stuff now, it's time they started asking questions of the direction and management of the club under Ashley and Bruce.

There we go. All about "me"

Because the whole thing needs to be about him. The constant 24 hour delay before he posts his contrary opinion each time there's something newsworthy is evidence of that.

Of course he is, and like always, he's left it 24 hours before giving his "take" on it so he can get the attention from it. Good old Luke, 24 hour hours late to the party again. As I said the other day, almost as if it's for attention.

Ryder : "I've got nothing to add to the story" then "Five things we learned from the Premier League not returning my calls"

Deleting tweets is great mind. Always makes the problem go away. He knows he's fucked up.