Joey Linton

Has Caulkin got owt right yet re. this takeover? How hard is it to understand he can only report on what he’s told. Especially by Staveley The buyers were told twice unofficially it was going to be done No - the buyers claimed that. Why would we believe them after this? Also, Caulkin was basing everything on one source - nothing to corroborate what they were telling him. And he's been made to look a fool by said source. Definitely. Won't go down well with his fan boys though. Conversely, Luke Edwards is clearly a WUM but has been far closer to what's actually been going on, however unpopular the truth turned out to be.

I've given Bruce nowhere near the level of stick that others have on here, but he's a fine one to talk about commitment the way he treated Sheffield Wednesday, particularly when he was having a hard time on a personal level.

Dear NUST My advice to you all, is to make sure your fridge works. Best wishes Richard Masters The Premier League

It’ll be a standard ‘we can’t say anything, confidential process etc etc’ No - both letters are private for good reason. It's not a PR exercise to make twitter happy. The tweet explains it was an acknowledgement. So the basic thanks for your letter we take your concerns on board it’s a confidential process blah blah blah. The tweet just makes it look like they have something extra when they blatantly don’t. This will be exactly what it is. If it's not to make twitter aware / happy, what exactly did they tweet for? Same old, same old.

Would you say the same about Benitez?

It's a nothing quote and you're getting all worked up over it. It's weird. I'm being critical of the quote for sure; saying I'm getting 'worked up' is a bit baseless - I'm just raising a point that I feel strongly about, just as anyone may raise any other point. In the context of the win and the reignited debate about whether or not Bruce should stay on after the takeover, I'm taking issue with and pointing out that his small-time Ashleyesque attitude is one very good reason why he shouldn't even be in the debate. Course you are being deliberately negative. If you actually watch the interview he talks about how they've told the players the focus is on catching the teams above and that they shouldn't be concerned with anyone below them. The whole interview is based around doing better than they are, the exact opposite of making do like you claim. That doesn't fit your overall agenda though, does it?

Strange one, he probably has, but he's probably put in some of our worst individual performances of the season too.

Forward in a two upfront playing a supporting role. Strange that he's not been used in that system, but we don't really have anyone for him to play off other than Carroll who is an unreliable crock. Out of what we've got, i'd has put ASM alongside him, but like you say, we haven't got anything really to go with. Him and Rondon would have been canny. Definitely agree on Rondon.

He was full of praise for all the players and staff in the BBC interview, as well as all the people involved in making the changes to allow football to restart as well. Still a prick. Probably agree, but he's done OK overall. Still want someone else in of the takeover goes through.

1) they had ten men 2) they played literally a couple of days ago Neither of those things should detract from how comfortably we put them away today, unless your default is he gets no praise ever. No it isn't? but those things obviously matter, unless you think playing a full strength team, fully fit and not knackered is somehow easier to play? keeper and a defender error for both goals? Does context not exist? Results and performances are what matter. Both were good today. Can't have any complaints unless you're simply desperate not to give out any praise at all.

He was full of praise for all the players and staff in the BBC interview, as well as all the people involved in making the changes to allow football to restart as well.

1) they had ten men 2) they played literally a couple of days ago Neither of those things should detract from how comfortably we put them away today, unless your default is he gets no praise ever.

Forward in a two upfront playing a supporting role. Strange that he's not been used in that system, but we don't really have anyone for him to play off other than Carroll who is an unreliable crock.

Still no idea what his position would be, but he's definitely not the centre forward we signed him to be.

Deserves a lot of credit for today, especially given how many people were convinced we'd be short of fitness compared to the opposition. Pretty much never troubled us.

Very little in that report that the premier league won't have known about already. If they've been waiting on it, I would imagine it's too cover their backs if they are going to say no.

Reported to your employer. Self employed... Just got a pay rise, cheers matey I f***ing love our number 9

Reported to your employer.

No on both counts. The one of us suggesting the other should go through someone's bins shouldn't be calling anyone weird.

Having point blank refused to delete it, I wonder why he then did? Must just be a massive coincidence.

You are utterly deranged. Not sure how you come to that conclusion when his employer completely agreed with what I said.... You're a genuine danger and shouldn't be allowed near cutlery. Do you genuinely think outside your bubble of Newcastle fans (and Man City fans who've been after Delaney for similar demented reasons for years) that you don't look like a complete f***ing maniac? His employer agreed with me. Are you unable to grasp that? What we're you hoping to get out of it? The inappropriate comment removed. He was asked to do it and didn't. Seems those who pay him for his thoughts disagreed with him.

You are utterly deranged. Not sure how you come to that conclusion when his employer completely agreed with what I said.... You're a genuine danger and shouldn't be allowed near cutlery. Do you genuinely think outside your bubble of Newcastle fans (and Man City fans who've been after Delaney for similar demented reasons for years) that you don't look like a complete f***ing maniac? His employer agreed with me. Are you unable to grasp that? When are you going to start going through his bins? Making stuff up now?

You are utterly deranged. Not sure how you come to that conclusion when his employer completely agreed with what I said.... You're a genuine danger and shouldn't be allowed near cutlery. Do you genuinely think outside your bubble of Newcastle fans (and Man City fans who've been after Delaney for similar demented reasons for years) that you don't look like a complete f***ing maniac? His employer agreed with me. Are you unable to grasp that?

You are utterly deranged. Not sure how you come to that conclusion when his employer completely agreed with what I said....

Got a reply to my complaint about Delaney, they said his conduct wasn't acceptable and that the relevant tweets had been taken down. Made himself fair game with his deliberately inflammatory "saviour of Newcastle" nonsense last week.