One thing that stood out to me was the PL QC saying that the CAT case should ONLY have jurisdictation if arbitration didn´t go in favour of NUFC. So he´s pretty much admitting that if arbitrartion doesn´t go in our favour the CAT case will have jurisdiction right?
He also seemed to put a fair bit of emphasis on the IF of arbitration going not going in our favour.
This is obviously pure speculation but could this suggest that the PL are expecting arbitration to go in our favour?