Displayname

Thats right Eddie.

I agree with that. Only sell Isak at our valuation, no discount. Rather see him here a year than give Liverpool a good deal after this summer.

I think its an allright metaphor. Hypocrisy would be saying that Isak is a bad guy and not the same about Wissa(if the circumstances were the same, which im not really sure about). I just want players who wants to play for us.

Accepting that a new girlfriend has cheated in her past relationship is different than accepting your wife cheating on you. Its human. I want people who wants to play for us, and its not like its a risk that Wissa would want bigger and better things later.

Lets not just take these posers at their word.

On the same page then. But I can't see us selling Isak without getting a replacement first. So if thats the line-up it would be Eddies decision to either leave Isak out or easing the new striker(s) in.

It's a huge decision for him like, not going to hold it against him if he needs time to think.

Well its the same back 4 that started most games after Hall got injured, so not surprised by that.

Other than a striker missing, whats wrong with it?

Still have faith in the extremely legit Slovevian reporter and I'm just going to assume that all the other reporters are just trying to maximize their views.

Just a bit of advice, avoid the "Best of Alexander Isak" videos that pop up on youtube.

It's a long term goal, has to be with the current rules. Isak might be retired by the time we get there.

But i'm the patronising one? I'm not embarrased by not getting every spelling right, English isn't my first language.

You're serious? 🤣

What else is holding us back?

Follow the discussion bro..

I dont know which examples you are thinking of. But I know it didnt get the selling club out of the PSR jam we currently are in. So again, not comparable.

Well then technically people are benefitting from selling to direct rivals all the time.

So Palace are direct rivals to City?

The current PSR rules haven't existed for a long time so the history is kinda irrelevant.

If we are selling Isak it's not because we were pushed around, it's because its whats best for the club. The Saudis aren't going to let themselves be pushed around.

This guy just reported that we bid €90m for Sesko.

Its doubtable.

Talking about us supposedly promise him a new contract previously.

"Promising" to give him a new contract just sounds so weird. Why not just negotiate and give him a new contract?