Keegans Export

This thread; "Nobody sings any more" 😠 *Sings song* "NO not that one!" 😡 *Sings different song* "YOU'RE SINGING IT TOO FAST" 🤬 (posted partly in jest...)

But if we have deals turned down, then the latest rules are also found to be null and void...

I'd be quite happy just doing what we were doing. Any top PL club could have signed Isak, Bruno, Botman, Gordon...it's not like we put £120m and £500k/week on the table to blow everyone else out of the water. Now we can't even do that, without selling one of those players to one of the clubs we're trying to overtake.

Do UEFA have their own version of APT rules?

Which three were found unlawful?

That's fair, and is one of the main issues at SJP. The problem is that, like in SJP, there hasn't been an effort to facilitate that sort of grouping together of likeminded supporters. Again, credit to Wor Flags for trying to do just that but I think it's a huge uphill task without support from official channels.

Yeah credit to @Heron and the Wor Flags lads and lasses but I can't see the atmosphere being any better than last time out seeing as its largely going to be all the same people attending. Hopefully I'm wrong.

Transfermarkt has him 75% on the left

A right-footed left-winger you say... Do they have any goalkeepers they're willing to part with too?

I just don't think we can shop in that £50m+ bracket. Or at least we can't do that and fill all the gaps in the squad.

He'll tear his pectoral putting the pen down after he's signed the new contract

#InBunceWeTrust

What the tweet above appears to be speculating is that the panel have said that any changes the PL have made to the rules after the hearing (ie the ones that got voted through at the end of last year) are beyond their remit, therefore another hearing is needed to determine whether the amended rules are valid or not.

That's exactly what got (I think) Derby in bother. They didn't do a flat rate of amortisation because they argued that a players value decreased more in relative terms in the final year of his contract compared to going from 3 years to 2 years etc. It may not have been Derby but there was a club that did it that way and that's why they ended up forcing a straight line amortisation.

There was also a rumour that the home kit was going to have some sort of tartan pattern?

The problem with anchoring (from our perspective) is that it will be used in conjunction with the proposed 70% cap, rather than replace it, as I understand it. We'll still be limited to either the anchoring multiplier or the 70% cap, whichever is the lowest. It means that even if we can find a way around the APT rules and substantially increase our revenue, there's going to be another cap right around the corner.

This has probably been covered but would this be extra time and pens or straight to pens?

It's 10% for cup games I think

This is what I reckon too. Having Burn at LB gives the extra height for set pieces, Hall is a solid defensive option and is comfortable on the ball, gives us a bit of control. Could allow Gordon a bit of freedom too.

But even a quick fingering would do

I'll be honest, that bottom one is fucking class

That's even closer to the current site than I'd expected, assumed they would move up past all the trees

PSR Headroom can play on the right. "Money to spend in the summer" can cover CB and "We could get better value from sponsorship in the future" could be Isak's backup.

Perhaps we could just have a 24/7 livestream of each office? £14.99/month or £9.99 for Mags+ members

There's been quite a lot of communication from the club in fairness. We've had one or two things at the Stack. Brad Miller has done some on the record stuff. Silverstone gives quotes every so often. Are people expecting weekly updates?