

KetsbaiaIsBald
Member-
Posts
1,432 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by KetsbaiaIsBald
-
I wonder what the impact of this is. Maybe it makes it easier to now look for damages. It is interesting that some clubs, like us, put funds into the club by issuing new shares. Our owners have put in additional funds several times by issuing say 1 share for 30 million (I’ve forgotten the name of this transaction). Whilst others put in money through loans. Ashley had a something like a hundred million load the whole time he owned us. There must be benefits to doing it one way or the other. Given Ashley chose loans I presume it’s better for the owner to do this. On selling the club it makes no difference as the load is factored into the price. I guess it makes taking the money out easier. Maybe it also allows shared owners to keep the same ownership percentages with a single owner injecting funds. I wonder if there are other issues what will make it difficult for the clubs that have loans to simple switch approaches.
-
I think the article was fair. And I completely agree with the stadium announcement being kicked down the road. We've waited all year for the announcement and it was basically "phase 1 is complete, we're now starting phase 2".
-
I hope they follow through on their threat and try to get an injunction against the premier league.
-
It really is not that simple when dealing with the amounts that the clubs are borrowing. 200 million for example is nearly getting into the world of syndicate loans. The process to determine the rates is highly complex even if the loan is party to party.
-
Hopefully the meeting goes something like: - Man City call a vote to retroactively change the rules so loans interest is included in ffp calcs - vote fails - Man City call a vote to remove all ffp rules as without the loans they are unlawful. They remind everyone voting that they will be personally liable if they vote for something that is knowingly unlawful. (I’m seem to recall that early days Staveley wrote a letter to the chairmen of the other clubs reminding them that they would be liable if they voted for rules that broke competition law. At the time I guess they could hide behind their solicitors saying they believe the rules were lawful. This vote would be clear as day that they are knowingly voting for rules that are not lawful)
-
The interest free loans implications could be interesting. They said the rules are unlawful as they allow internet free loans. So until interest free loans are included the rules as a whole are unlawful. If they include loans now a number of clubs will be in breach. If they said we will introduce the loans rules later they are basically saying that they want to run with rules for a period of time that they know are not lawful. So do they either need to add the loans now or remove the rules until they’re added?
-
Come on lads keep it going in the second half. That penalty miss can’t be the story of the game. Come on Gordon.
-
Everton vs. Newcastle United: 05/10/24 @ 17:30 (Sky Sports)
KetsbaiaIsBald replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
I’m dreading this. We’re at our worst away to mediocre opposition and I have an irrational dislike of this fuckers. -
I want to see Tonali in a match like this where he’ll get 10 times the touches.
-
is that lawyer talk for this bloke is a cunt and speculating?
-
are owners will be shitting it. No financial rules to hide behind 😈
-
I recon all the rumours about this week was someone taking a guess that we’d hear something due to the scheduled meeting.
-
The budget was 8m. They’ve spent 45m. So each club will have nearly 2m less income. It would be amusing if this 2m put all 20 clubs into breach of the financial regulations and all 20 appealed…
-
-
Everton are going to beat by 2-3. We're just not right.
-
We all wait all week for this. All season there is so little joy in watching us play. And today the score line reflects it and it should have been more. Get the fucking Italian international on. If Gordon is injured get him off. We can still win this mind. Even if we just click for 5 minutes.
-
I did wonder whether Howe was being so positive so that it does not look like he has an issue with multiple people. If Howe is playing a bit of a game with Mitchell it does not look good if he’s in conflict with two people. He’d look more like the issue not Mitchell.