Jump to content

We have to stop playing two defensive midfielders if we play 433.


Parky

Recommended Posts

Seriously this lark has to stop it is limiting our options all over the place. Sam's safety first  I only want to see away to the big 4 and never in other games.

 

The mf three should be a holding DM,  an allround midfielder with good passing skills and license to move up and an attaking midfielder who should generate tempo and attack the box with late runs.

 

....and who be they?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Play N'Zogbia in a position he's very poor in and which neutralizes his game? Good thinking Batman.

 

You clearly haven't the first clue how a 433 works...

 

 

Shades of Arteta plays in the middle? :giggle:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Play N'Zogbia in a position he's very poor in and which neutralizes his game? Good thinking Batman.

 

You clearly haven't the first clue how a 433 works...

 

 

Shades of Arteta plays in the middle? :giggle:

 

Don't fucking patronise me Enid Blyton. The three in the middle are central players. Or is Frank Lampard a winger now? :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Play N'Zogbia in a position he's very poor in and which neutralizes his game? Good thinking Batman.

 

You clearly haven't the first clue how a 433 works...

 

 

Shades of Arteta plays in the middle? :giggle:

 

Don't fucking patronise me Enid Blyton. The three in the middle are central players. Or is Frank Lampard a winger now? :rolleyes:

 

The center left sided midfielder in a 433 interchanges with the left forward (who cycles like a Diouf) pretty much ( although diff variation) as Zoggy did with Milner yesterday. If you are suggesting we play Zoggy as a winger then it isn't 433 then is it? If on the other hand you want him on the left of a forward 3 that is a different debate to do with forwards and not midfielders.

 

Try not to be so disparaging in future and I will give you the same respect.

 

Which is it?

 

 

Afterthought: I and I suspect like you would rather we play a 442 with Zoggy and Duff etc as proper wingers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Play N'Zogbia in a position he's very poor in and which neutralizes his game? Good thinking Batman.

 

You clearly haven't the first clue how a 433 works...

 

 

Shades of Arteta plays in the middle? :giggle:

 

Don't fucking patronise me Enid Blyton. The three in the middle are central players. Or is Frank Lampard a winger now? :rolleyes:

 

The center left sided midfielder in a 433 interchanges with the left forward (who cycles like a Diouf) pretty much ( although diff variation) as Zoggy did with Milner yesterday. If you are suggesting we play Zoggy as a winger then it isn't 433 then is it? If on the other hand you want him on the left of a forward 3 that is a different debate to do with forwards and not midfielders.

 

Try not to be so disparaging in future and I will give you the same respect.

 

Which is it?

 

He can play on the 'wing' as one of the front 3, he's not cut out for central midfield, not to mention that he neutralizes what he's best at which is beating his full back with pace. There's a reason Mourinho never used/uses Duff, SWP, Robben in one of the central 3 whether they "interchange" or not - why have I never seen Frank Lampard or Michael Ballack charging down the wing towards the full back btw? Maybe Jose doesn't have the first clue how a 4-3-3 works eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Play N'Zogbia in a position he's very poor in and which neutralizes his game? Good thinking Batman.

 

You clearly haven't the first clue how a 433 works...

 

 

Shades of Arteta plays in the middle? :giggle:

 

Don't fucking patronise me Enid Blyton. The three in the middle are central players. Or is Frank Lampard a winger now? :rolleyes:

 

The center left sided midfielder in a 433 interchanges with the left forward (who cycles like a Diouf) pretty much ( although diff variation) as Zoggy did with Milner yesterday. If you are suggesting we play Zoggy as a winger then it isn't 433 then is it? If on the other hand you want him on the left of a forward 3 that is a different debate to do with forwards and not midfielders.

 

Try not to be so disparaging in future and I will give you the same respect.

 

Which is it?

 

He can play on the 'wing' as one of the front 3, he's not cut out for central midfield, not to mention that he neutralizes what he's best at which is beating his full back with pace. There's a reason Mourinho never used/uses Duff, SWP, Robben in one of the central 3 whether they "interchange" or not - why have I never seen Frank Lampard or Michael Ballack charging down the wing towards the full back btw? Maybe Jose doesn't have the first clue how a 4-3-3 works eh?

 

They don't really play a proper 433 anymore mainly due to Mourinho's hankering for extra cover in the shape of Makelele. EDIT: And Essien and Mikel tend to hold the middle...It's overkill really and typical hyperdefensive approach of Mourinho. It's more of a 451 with Cole doing the overlap.

 

Fact is stranger than fiction in the sense that Allardyce's ideas at Bolton and what he probably will try and put into practice for us is more exotic and intersting than the stodge Mourinho dishes up. I'm only bitching about the need for 2 DM's.

 

Interchanging is the heart of a 433 giving options in the second phase ie if Milner/Duff cuts in then Zoggy goes wide and visa versa. Zoggy and later Barton shouldn't feel trapped in the middle...I know it looks like that on paper.

 

Quiroz and Fergie used to argue about this all the time I reckon....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too, but at the moment he is hamstrung, pardon the expression by the loss of Barton and Emre. He realises this and changed it around in the last two games. Personally as mentioned, I'd rather see us playing 4-4-2, at home anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens when Enrique, Barton and Emre are all ready.

 

I think 4-3-3 means we don't get the best from our best players (our strikers and our wingers) and means we can't fit as many in as we should have. I think the return to form of Owen may force the 4-4-2, which for me is a good thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too, but at the moment he is hamstrung, pardon the expression by the loss of Barton and Emre. He realises this and changed it around in the last two games. Personally as mentioned, I'd rather see us playing 4-4-2, at home anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens when Enrique, Barton and Emre are all ready.

 

I think 4-3-3 means we don't get the best from our best players (our strikers and our wingers) and means we can't fit as many in as we should have. I think the return to form of Owen may force the 4-4-2, which for me is a good thing.

 

Totally agree with all of that. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too, but at the moment he is hamstrung, pardon the expression by the loss of Barton and Emre. He realises this and changed it around in the last two games. Personally as mentioned, I'd rather see us playing 4-4-2, at home anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens when Enrique, Barton and Emre are all ready.

 

I think 4-3-3 means we don't get the best from our best players (our strikers and our wingers) and means we can't fit as many in as we should have. I think the return to form of Owen may force the 4-4-2, which for me is a good thing.

 

Sums up my thoughts as well.

 

Everyone's talking about the midfield, but I think Viduka's been a problem in this 4-3-3. He might have the build but he clearly doesn't have the legs for such a demanding role. On his own he's easy prey for two defenders and lacks the movement to be beating them to balls, the games so far have been largely passing him by. Put a striker alongside him and that all changes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree too, but at the moment he is hamstrung, pardon the expression by the loss of Barton and Emre. He realises this and changed it around in the last two games. Personally as mentioned, I'd rather see us playing 4-4-2, at home anyway, it will be interesting to see what happens when Enrique, Barton and Emre are all ready.

 

I think 4-3-3 means we don't get the best from our best players (our strikers and our wingers) and means we can't fit as many in as we should have. I think the return to form of Owen may force the 4-4-2, which for me is a good thing.

 

Sums up my thoughts as well.

 

Everyone's talking about the midfield, but I think Viduka's been a problem in this 4-3-3. He might have the build but he clearly doesn't have the legs for such a demanding role. On his own he's easy prey for two defenders and lacks the movement to be beating them to balls, the games so far have been largely passing him by. Put a striker alongside him and that all changes.

 

Yup.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Knightrider

If Sam changes from 4-3-3 I'll eat my hat, he may alternate every now and again but I honestly can't see him not sticking with it, ideal personnel or no ideal personnel. Then again he is a progressive manager and didn't always use 4-3-3 at Bolton, he started out 4-5-1, went to 4-4-2, tried 3-5-2 out and eventually stuck on 4-3-3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would rather play 4-4-2 but for the sake of the thread, when all fit it would probably be (as a front 6):

 

              Butt

                        Emre

          Barton

Martins            N'Zogbia

            Viduka

 

But that would mean dropping Owen (best striker) and dropping Milner (undeserved), Thats why I want us to play 4-4-2.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...