Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 He looks like a right spacka on Matty Pattinson's facebook. Likes a couple of shandies by the looks of things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I don't know what's so great about him ? He's played about 2 or 3 times ever in the first team and people are wanting him in the starting line up against one of the best teams in the world.... His last appearance for the first team (i think)....last season, against Man Utd at St James' Park, and he scored. So just because he scored means he should be getting his game every week ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sniffer Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Because boro have developed so many outstanding young players in their academy? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I don't know what's so great about him ? He's played about 2 or 3 times ever in the first team and people are wanting him in the starting line up against one of the best teams in the world.... His last appearance for the first team (i think)....last season, against Man Utd at St James' Park, and he scored. So just because he scored means he should be getting his game every week ? No its very simple, its because Carr is that fuking shit and we've got fuk all else he should start. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Because boro have developed so many outstanding young players in their academy? They've got loads of youth littered around their 1st team ATM, and many of them are doing quite well considering. They get a chance, our don't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 James 'try my best but that's about it, btw I'm also fucking knackered' Milner or Lua 'I've got pace, for a start' Lua? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 James 'try my best but that's about it, btw I'm also fucking knackered' Milner or Lua 'I've got pace, for a start' Lua? Getting the idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sniffer Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Aye considering we are shite and there's still nobody from boros young stars that I'd want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Aye considering we are shite and there's still nobody from boros young stars that I'd want. I'd take Wheater, Cattermole, Downing, Andrew Taylor for nowt, no problem at all. Taylor would be great for squad rotation at left back, we'd be delighted to have someone of his quality come through the ranks. Wheater's doing well, rash and dirty but thats Boro's policy Cattermole is a canny combative midfielder, better than Geremi, Butt or any other holding type we've got. Downing needs no explanation. Adam Johnson is another one who's coming good, and there's so much hype around Porritt, although i've never seen him play. The lads who's just fuked off to Celtic was supposed to be another hot prospect, Ben Hutchinson. Like i said, we'd be lucky to have such a crop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Aye considering we are shite and there's still nobody from boros young stars that I'd want. I'd take Wheater, Cattermole, Downing, Andrew Taylor for nowt, no problem at all. Taylor would be great for squad rotation at left back, we'd be delighted to have someone of his quality come through the ranks. Wheater's doing well, rash and dirty but thats Boro's policy Cattermole is a canny combative midfielder, better than Geremi, Butt or any other holding type we've got. Downing needs no explanation. Adam Johnson is another one who's coming good, and there's so much hype around Porritt, although i've never seen him play. The lads who's just fuked off to Celtic was supposed to be another hot prospect, Ben Hutchinson. Like i said, we'd be lucky to have such a crop. We were sniffing around him about 2 years ago when Roeder was manager. Useless piece of trivia for you there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of shit. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of shit. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of s***. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. who would you play chopra in place of (apart from smith) ? chopra will never get a regular game in the prem Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of s***. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. who would you play chopra in place of (apart from smith) ? chopra will never get a regular game in the prem Why can't i include Smith? Is there a problem in wasting £6m? We could of had him last season when Owen was out instead of the crap we to field, he could of been closer to prem football at the club he loves. Viduka's been injured, Owen's been coming back from injury, Martins has been away, you saying we couldn't of done with Chopra instead of playing Smith or half fit players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of s***. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. who would you play chopra in place of (apart from smith) ? chopra will never get a regular game in the prem Why can't i include Smith? Is there a problem in wasting £6m? We could of had him last season when Owen was out instead of the crap we to field, he could of been closer to prem football at the club he loves. Viduka's been injured, Owen's been coming back from injury, Martins has been away, you saying we couldn't of done with Chopra instead of playing Smith or half fit players? even with what we've had chopra wouldn't have been given a start,even the mackems think he's shite....i'd rather play milner off andy carroll than play chopra Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of s***. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. who would you play chopra in place of (apart from smith) ? chopra will never get a regular game in the prem Why can't i include Smith? Is there a problem in wasting £6m? We could of had him last season when Owen was out instead of the crap we to field, he could of been closer to prem football at the club he loves. Viduka's been injured, Owen's been coming back from injury, Martins has been away, you saying we couldn't of done with Chopra instead of playing Smith or half fit players? even with what we've had chopra wouldn't have been given a start,even the mackems think he's shite....i'd rather play milner off andy carroll than play chopra Would you rather play Smith or Chopra? Would you rather have a free Chopra on our books or a £6m Smith? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of s***. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. who would you play chopra in place of (apart from smith) ? chopra will never get a regular game in the prem Why can't i include Smith? Is there a problem in wasting £6m? We could of had him last season when Owen was out instead of the crap we to field, he could of been closer to prem football at the club he loves. Viduka's been injured, Owen's been coming back from injury, Martins has been away, you saying we couldn't of done with Chopra instead of playing Smith or half fit players? even with what we've had chopra wouldn't have been given a start,even the mackems think he's s****....i'd rather play milner off andy carroll than play chopra Would you rather play Smith or Chopra? Would you rather have a free Chopra on our books or a £6m Smith? i'd play milner up front before either. i'd rather we hadn't bought smith but cashed in on chopra Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I agree with you in a way TT, but i just don't think our youngin's are ready, or even good enough yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Thats a bit of a rash challenge there TT. Chopra wouldnt get near the starting line up if he was still here and rightfully so, that just a bit of geordie tinted specs blocking the path of sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 Seems a bit unfair iyam, the experienced pros have, by and large, been awful. So if we now turn to the young uns to pull us out the shit in a relegation dog fight. 'Thanks a lot' they must be thinking Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of s***. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Agree with this. He was 4th choice to Ormerod, Agyemang & Mellor for half a season in a team in the bottom 3 in the Championship, and yet now people want him getting a game for us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 A correct one though. Alan 'no goals' Smith or Andy 'never had a proper chance' Carroll? Stephen 'the useless fuking retarded cock sucking dwarf' Carr or David 'I need some fuking games' Edgar? you know why andy carroll never had or probably will never get a proper chance.........................because he's not good enough. i've heard the same thing said about joe allon,paul brayson,paul robinson and michael chopra...."you never know till you try them" pile of shit. tell you what,you never know i might have been good enough just wasn't given a chance. Chopra never got a chance but was clearly good enough, or at least better than what we've got. Scored more goals in less games than Smith this season, in a so called worse team. Owen's got one more in about the same games, Viduka 2 more and our top scorer 3 more. No, he was never good enough. He was as weak as piss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 And on my Carroll point, Irvine fought tooth and nail to keep Paul Gallagher until the end of the season, yet he couldn't get shot of Carroll quick enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 21, 2008 Share Posted February 21, 2008 I would pee myself laughing at you lot if Carroll was brought on and scored on Saturday, infact I hope it happens. It would be great to see what you would all say about him then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now