cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I reckon we could do with a bit more energy, I saw the match from a very different viewpoint to most and I'd say we had more technique but not the legs, the blues seemed to have a much higher level of fitness, that was our downfall....... and the fact most of my gk's went to their strikers Graeme Souness called, he wants his perspective back. check out reply 51, stupee Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 blues need a captain, if rich is away. i nominate stupedoo I'd be flattered if I wasn't waiting for the punchline... ... ... ... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I reckon we could do with a bit more energy, I saw the match from a very different viewpoint to most and I'd say we had more technique but not the legs, the blues seemed to have a much higher level of fitness, that was our downfall....... and the fact most of my gk's went to their strikers Graeme Souness called, he wants his perspective back. I honesty think we did, if you hadn't had Wullie I could have had a kip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I reckon we could do with a bit more energy, I saw the match from a very different viewpoint to most and I'd say we had more technique but not the legs, the blues seemed to have a much higher level of fitness, that was our downfall....... and the fact most of my gk's went to their strikers Graeme Souness called, he wants his perspective back. I honesty think we did, if you hadn't had Wullie I could have had a kip. you may as well have been when i fired my rockets in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 blues need a captain, if rich is away. i nominate stupedoo I'd be flattered if I wasn't waiting for the punchline... ... ... ... oh, erm, erm, your an expert on good leadership,....( see Ashley, ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I reckon we could do with a bit more energy, I saw the match from a very different viewpoint to most and I'd say we had more technique but not the legs, the blues seemed to have a much higher level of fitness, that was our downfall....... and the fact most of my gk's went to their strikers Graeme Souness called, he wants his perspective back. I honesty think we did, if you hadn't had Wullie I could have had a kip. you may as well have been when i fired my rockets in. Fair play, you had a good game, decent finish, I felt I should have had it though, I hate being beaten near post, at least I think it was you who'd scored. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 Anyone want to swap with me at CB? Been there or in goal the last two games so would like a change. I will if you want. You've just caused anarchy throughout the blue team with this post. fking chaotic pms, messing up the formation, 10 requests to play Cf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I reckon we could do with a bit more energy, I saw the match from a very different viewpoint to most and I'd say we had more technique but not the legs, the blues seemed to have a much higher level of fitness, that was our downfall....... and the fact most of my gk's went to their strikers Graeme Souness called, he wants his perspective back. I honesty think we did, if you hadn't had Wullie I could have had a kip. Nae offence, as I think you're all canny lads, but until Stu Brown came on..the reds were sorely lacking any semblance of technique. Hoof and hope was the only tactical plan I saw...did you even have anyone who wanted the ball in the first 20minutes?! I know you only had 10 men, but you can't use that as an excuse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 we could be in trouble if stu brown plays full game. stuppeedo, might have to drop, in dm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I should be ok playing CB because I'm alright at heading and quite vocal, I can organize the back 4(hopefully) Not going to big myself up this time though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I should be ok playing CB because I'm alright at heading and quite vocal, I can organize the back 4(hopefully) Not going to big myself up this time though. Massive contradiction there! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I should be ok playing CB because I'm alright at heading and quite vocal, I can organize the back 4(hopefully) Not going to big myself up this time though. Massive contradiction there! I'm trying to reassure the Nut. The first time I said I would dominate the blue CB's and bang the goals in, and the second time. That's a big step down imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I should be ok playing CB because I'm alright at heading and quite vocal, I can organize the back 4(hopefully) Not going to big myself up this time though. Massive contradiction there! I'm trying to reassure the Nut. The first time I said I would dominate the blue CB's and bang the goals in, and the second time. That's a big step down imo. Am i right in thinking it was the first time you played with grown blokes and wern't the biggest lad there pilko? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I should be ok playing CB because I'm alright at heading and quite vocal, I can organize the back 4(hopefully) Not going to big myself up this time though. Massive contradiction there! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I should be ok playing CB because I'm alright at heading and quite vocal, I can organize the back 4(hopefully) Not going to big myself up this time though. Massive contradiction there! I'm trying to reassure the Nut. The first time I said I would dominate the blue CB's and bang the goals in, and the second time. That's a big step down imo. Did you even speak in the last game?! Plus you backed out of two headers that I recall. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I just want to score. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I just want to score. when did you last date a lass? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stu Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane When you do that with footballers like Pilko said about the Blue Team and when you [Nixon] do things like that [tackle] to a man like CP40, I'm... I...I've kept really quiet but I'll tell you something: Pilko went down in my estimation when he did that. We have not resorted to that. But I'll tell ya, you can tell him now, he'll be watching it: we're still fighting for this title and he's got to go to Longbenton and get something and... and... I'll tell ya... honestly... I will love it if we beat them. Love it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane When you do that with footballers like Pilko said about the Blue Team and when you [Nixon] do things like that [tackle] to a man like CP40, I'm... I...I've kept really quiet but I'll tell you something: Pilko went down in my estimation when he did that. We have not resorted to that. But I'll tell ya, you can tell him now, he'll be watching it: we're still fighting for this title and he's got to go to Longbenton and get something and... and... I'll tell ya... honestly... I will love it if we beat them. Love it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane What is with that comma! That doesn't say "you played well" it says "you played .... welll" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane When you do that with footballers like Pilko said about the Blue Team and when you [Nixon] do things like that [tackle] to a man like CP40, I'm... I...I've kept really quiet but I'll tell you something: Pilko went down in my estimation when he did that. We have not resorted to that. But I'll tell ya, you can tell him now, he'll be watching it: we're still fighting for this title and he's got to go to Longbenton and get something and... and... I'll tell ya... honestly... I will love it if we beat them. Love it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane What is with that comma! That doesn't say "you played well" it says "you played .... welll" Home lapto is dodgy plus I've had 8 pints. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I'm confused! We were all technique and no legs? I've not no technique! ALL IVE GOT ITS LEGS! :'( You played, well. I was talking bout people like Nixon, he had more technique than Zidane When you do that with footballers like Pilko said about the Blue Team and when you [Nixon] do things like that [tackle] to a man like CP40, I'm... I...I've kept really quiet but I'll tell you something: Pilko went down in my estimation when he did that. We have not resorted to that. But I'll tell ya, you can tell him now, he'll be watching it: we're still fighting for this title and he's got to go to Longbenton and get something and... and... I'll tell ya... honestly... I will love it if we beat them. Love it It was wullie I floored. Bless him I thought he was going to apologise for not getting out the way out of my knee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now