Neil Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? I haven't got a fucking clue. It was just an option I'd never tried before. I think it is along the 3 from 4 lines. If I'd bet £4 in total I could've won £17ish but I only went for £2 in total, 4 x 50p, so max win is about £8. Canny shit, but I'm just experimenting. Quick edit.. if anyone more savvy can shed some light.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? I haven't got a fucking clue. It was just an option I'd never tried before. I think it is along the 3 from 4 lines. If I'd bet £4 in total I could've won £17ish but I only went for £2 in total, 4 x 50p, so max win is about £8. Canny shit, but I'm just experimenting. Quick edit.. if anyone more savvy can shed some light.. You say canny shit, but I don't usually splash much out so it'd be something I'd be interested in probably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? I haven't got a fucking clue. It was just an option I'd never tried before. I think it is along the 3 from 4 lines. If I'd bet £4 in total I could've won £17ish but I only went for £2 in total, 4 x 50p, so max win is about £8. Canny shit, but I'm just experimenting. Quick edit.. if anyone more savvy can shed some light.. You say canny shit, but I don't usually splash much out so it'd be something I'd be interested in probably. I meant canny shit looking at some of the money people have spent in this thread and the amounts they hope to win. I'm all about the small stakes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? Yes, that means she bets four trebles. If you do it on low odds games, put a quadruple on as well to make it worth it. I usually only use it when there's a couple of games with higher odds (2.5 and up). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? I haven't got a fucking clue. It was just an option I'd never tried before. I think it is along the 3 from 4 lines. If I'd bet £4 in total I could've won £17ish but I only went for £2 in total, 4 x 50p, so max win is about £8. Canny shit, but I'm just experimenting. Quick edit.. if anyone more savvy can shed some light.. You say canny shit, but I don't usually splash much out so it'd be something I'd be interested in probably. I meant canny shit looking at some of the money people have spent in this thread and the amounts they hope to win. I'm all about the small stakes. Ah true like. I never have the balls to put like £50 on a 'likely' double or owt. I seem to waste my money on things that never come off. It's just the '3 from 4' thing interested me, because 99% of the time I lose a bet involving 4,5, maybe 6 teams, it's effing one team that bugger it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Atletico Madrid Fiorentina Hamburg River Plate Atletico MG Tenner pays bout £120 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? Yes, that means she bets four trebles. If you do it on low odds games, put a quadruple on as well to make it worth it. I usually only use it when there's a couple of games with higher odds (2.5 and up). Cheers for clearing it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Jill, does that literally mean, get 3 from 4 and you win? How much are the overall odds reduced by? I haven't got a fucking clue. It was just an option I'd never tried before. I think it is along the 3 from 4 lines. If I'd bet £4 in total I could've won £17ish but I only went for £2 in total, 4 x 50p, so max win is about £8. Canny shit, but I'm just experimenting. Quick edit.. if anyone more savvy can shed some light.. You say canny shit, but I don't usually splash much out so it'd be something I'd be interested in probably. I meant canny shit looking at some of the money people have spent in this thread and the amounts they hope to win. I'm all about the small stakes. Ah true like. I never have the balls to put like £50 on a 'likely' double or owt. I seem to waste my money on things that never come off. It's just the '3 from 4' thing interested me, because 99% of the time I lose a bet involving 4,5, maybe 6 teams, it's effing one team that bugger it up. Start with putting smaller bets on likely games, say five quids a bet. As your bankroll increases, so does the amount you put on each bet. Three out of four systems are good if you've got high odds games, but shite if not, as you win on three but lose on the fourth you're still likely to be down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 £5 on Cahill to score and £3 on more than 130 goal minutes in that game. Just a bit of fun to make that game a bit interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 £5 on Cahill to score and £3 on more than 130 goal minutes in that game. Just a bit of fun to make that game a bit interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 £5 on Cahill to score and £3 on more than 130 goal minutes in that game. Just a bit of fun to make that game a bit interesting. Predict the aggregate time of all goals scored in the match, eg. goals in the 24th, 51st and 59th minutes make up at 134 minutes. 90 minutes play only. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 £5 on Cahill to score and £3 on more than 130 goal minutes in that game. Just a bit of fun to make that game a bit interesting. Predict the aggregate time of all goals scored in the match, eg. goals in the 24th, 51st and 59th minutes make up at 134 minutes. 90 minutes play only. Christ. I'd rather go on Deal or No Deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucaAltieri Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Trixie on Sampdoria, Genoa, and Cagliari. Single on De Rossi anytime scorer for Roma. Single on Man City to win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Man City -1 @ 7/4 Fucking bullshit officiating, absolute bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Man City -1 @ 7/4 Fucking bullshit officiating, absolute bollocks. Poor bastard, Richards was no where near off side Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Fiver on Villa, Ath Madrid & Hamburg = 3/1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Man City -1 @ 7/4 Fucking bullshit officiating, absolute bollocks. Poor bastard, Richards was no where near off side Ah well, had a little bet on Fulham @ 4/1, think they're priced too highly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Fulham 4/1!? Blimey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Villa - Fulham has got "draw" written all over it. They'll defend, and we haven't got a clue how to open up teams who do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 Villa - Fulham has got "draw" written all over it. They'll defend, and we haven't got a clue how to open up teams who do that. Carew will come off the bench and score the winner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 I wouldn't touch Aston Villa. Same with Everton, made the mistake of backing them last week but I wasn't for making the same mistake twice today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 I think if Carew and/or Heskey were playing, the Fulham defence would be fine, but I can see that front three causing them problems. Hughes doesn't like pace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 I wouldn't touch Aston Villa. Same with Everton, made the mistake of backing them last week but I wasn't for making the same mistake twice today. Got Everton as Wigan have been terrible since their win on the opening day. Still think Everton will get the three points, Wigan really do look poor. They will get a sending off as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 I think if Carew and/or Heskey were playing, the Fulham defence would be fine, but I can see that front three causing them problems. Hughes doesn't like pace. Told you! Hughes under pressure, corner conceded, goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts