LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 Are fans of a League 1 team a good judge of what is top class? If the Championship is anything to go by the standard in League 1 will be miles away from Premiership standard. I see no reason to sell Forster or Krul. Forster is contracted until June 2014 and Krul is contracted until June 2011 according to: - http://www.nufc.com/2009-10html/squad.html Loan one out for next season to a Championship club and have the other one as cover for Harper. It's not that long ago Norwich fans were watching Premiership football. And to be fair, a good save is a good save at the end of the day. Being able to judge a goalkeeper in more depth ie. positional sense and command of area, has little to do with what level of football your team plays at, more your own knowledge and grasp of the game. I sort of agree but there's a difference in saving shots from the likes of Rooney, Torres, etc. every week and the shots Forster will face in League 1. I'm not saying Forster won't turn out to be a really good keeper, I'm just saying League 1 is nowhere near the standard of the Championship never mind the Premiership so it's not the best yard stick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheshire Mag Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 Harper number 1 next year, thank him for his service, then push Krul & Forster. They're not going to stay around for ever. Aye, thanks Steve for sitting on your arse for 10 years, cheers for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Enforcer Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 Aye, I thought you were just saying they wouldn't know, because they watch a lower level of football. Now I know what you mean and I agree. He has to prove himself at a higher level now, but it's great he's taken the first step, much like Carroll has this year (albeit playing for us, but he got lucky with us being relegated, I guess). Whenever I hear about these prospect we have over the years, I much prefer seeing them actually do the business at a decent level and make gradual steps up, rather than making a name for themselves in the youth and reserve teams and failing to make the massive step up from there to our first team. Well done to him for making the most of the opportunity and lets hope his progress continues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 we should give harper next season and that's it krul and foster are going to be international's imo, the fact arsenal are sniffing around both tell's it own story Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 FF is a beast of keeper. He is in this months 442 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 FF is a beast of keeper. He is in this months 442 touted as england's next number 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 we should give harper next season and that's it krul and foster are going to be international's imo, the fact arsenal are sniffing around both tell's it own story Shame there's only room for one of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted March 24, 2010 Share Posted March 24, 2010 we should give harper next season and that's it krul and foster are going to be international's imo, the fact arsenal are sniffing around both tell's it own story Not necessarily. Wenger is on a par with Fergie when it comes to buying keepers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 Krul or Forster should go out on loan next year, we're going to have enough to deal with next year without also having an inexperienced keeper as number one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted March 25, 2010 Share Posted March 25, 2010 I'm not too bothered about whether they're inexperienced, I'm bothered about whether they're the best. I can understand keeping Harper in if it's tight between them, but if Forster or Krul are significantly better than Harper, then they should be number 1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now