Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Atlético always bottle it against Real. They haven't won a match against them since 1999.

 

Mallorca's home form is impressive, and our form is shaky. More than shaky it's patchy. We were terrible in the first half against Osasuna yet we were great during the second, going through their defence like butter like the Barça of last year. We'll see what Barça turns up...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Treks

I thought for 90 mins Barca were poor tbh. Pedro did make a difference coming on in the 2nd half and i would opt to start him over Henry against Mallorca. Maybe even throw Bojan on as a late sub seeing as he came on this week scored 1 and got another goal as a sub in the CL vs stuttgart.

 

Any news on Xavi? Heard he was 2 ish weeks away from returning. He will be sorely missed vs Arsenal IMO. Would like to see Sergio dropped for that game if im honest. Much prefer Yaya-Iniesta-Keita but knowning Pep, Busquets will start. Whats everyones thoughts on that CL tie? I would imagine if the proper Barca turn up, player their normal game it will be sumthing like the teacher vs the student. Normally Barca have trouble with English side who apply an anti-football approach against them. But Arsenal wont change a thing and i think that will cost them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we greatly improved in the second half against Osasuna to be honest. But we are very hit and miss indeed. Xavi seems to be progressing nicely and could be back against Mallorca.

 

Xavi's passing range and general metronome style of play is so important to the way you play. I actually find it interesting because I was looking at the 06 Champions League final the other day and the midfield was Deco-Edmilson-Van Bommell. I can't even imagine Barcelona without Xavi for some reason,he seems to embody everything about Barca and their style of play.

 

Was he not as much of a key player that season? Or is there another reason why he didn't play?

 

EDIT: Wiki tells me he tore the ligaments in his left knee and was out for 5 months. Saves you pointing it out for me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we greatly improved in the second half against Osasuna to be honest. But we are very hit and miss indeed. Xavi seems to be progressing nicely and could be back against Mallorca.

 

Xavi's passing range and general metronome style of play is so important to the way you play. I actually find it interesting because I was looking at the 06 Champions League final the other day and the midfield was Deco-Edmilson-Van Bommell. I can't even imagine Barcelona without Xavi for some reason,he seems to embody everything about Barca and their style of play.

 

Was he not as much of a key player that season? Or is there another reason why he didn't play?

 

 

 

 

 

He was injuried. He indeed was key on Rijkaard's team. He was the one that moved Xavi from a deep-lying playmaker position in Guardiola's mould to the more advanced one he plays now, which is where he has flourished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, just read that Belletti's goal in the final was his only goal for Barca. I think that's fantastic  :laugh:

 

 

 

Yeah, he kind of did sod all for us except *that* goal, which is enough! :clap:

 

Never understood why we sold Van Bommel, he is a great player. He kind of wanted out though, so I guess it had to be done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Van Bommel is good but he is a horrifically dirty bastard. A bit like Paul Scholes with his tackling.

 

Really want to get to Spain one day to see a game. Preferably to the San Mames before Athletic move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Van Bommel is good but he is a horrifically dirty b******. A bit like Paul Scholes with his tackling.

 

Really want to get to Spain one day to see a game. Preferably to the San Mames before Athletic move.

 

Aye, a shame that they are moving instead of renovating it, that place is one of the oldest pitches in Spain. So much history and tradition. It's not called "The Cathedral of Football" for nowt.

 

It's a weird move though, since the new stadium is just a few meters away from the old one (like the Giants did here with the new Giants stadium), but it will be much more modern and accessible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Van Bommel is good but he is a horrifically dirty b******. A bit like Paul Scholes with his tackling.

 

Really want to get to Spain one day to see a game. Preferably to the San Mames before Athletic move.

 

Aye, a shame that they are moving instead of renovating it, that place is one of the oldest pitches in Spain. So much history and tradition. It's not called "The Cathedral of Football" for nowt.

 

Not quite in the same league but always reminds me of WHL, double tiered stands right on top of the pitch. What a football ground should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Van Bommel is good but he is a horrifically dirty b******. A bit like Paul Scholes with his tackling.

 

Really want to get to Spain one day to see a game. Preferably to the San Mames before Athletic move.

 

Aye, a shame that they are moving instead of renovating it, that place is one of the oldest pitches in Spain. So much history and tradition. It's not called "The Cathedral of Football" for nowt.

 

Not quite in the same league but always reminds me of WHL, double tiered stands right on top of the pitch. What a football ground should be.

 

This is a slightly shabby 3d model of the new place. Sadly it looks like the stands are quite further away from the pitch.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMvV1v3aiOw&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its sad that all new stadiums follow this standard pattern, yes they may be more comfortable but there is nothing like a ground where the stands are right on top of the players. I guess its better than making into a bowl.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heck, I'm going to post some more of his quotes:

 

"I know why we managers are sacked: for losing. What I don't know is why they hire us. It's as mysterious as the Coca-Cola formula".

 

"Iniesta represents the whole and Messi the part. Messi needs more Andrés than Andrés needs Messi"

 

"Possibility and probability aren't the same. I prefer teams that look after the probability"

 

"Football has become a social dildo"

 

"Not being risky is the riskiest choice. Hence, to avoid risks, I'll be risky"

 

"Somebody that only knows football not even football knows"

 

"Messi represents the sistemic and contextual paradigm. We are all in context and context is in us. Leo Messi is the most obvious proof of this"

 

"27 years managing have thaught me opening your mouth will get it punched"

 

(talking about Fernando Redondo) "His work as possibilitator of possibilities to the rest of the team is what makes me admire him"

 

"Messi has improved a lot and I hope he keeps this up: not playing trascendentally balls that are, in fact, intrascendent"

 

(on tactics) "To take care of the juncture you first have to understand the structure"

 

"It's very hard, not only in football but in life, to attribute a cause-effect relation. Just five minutes later, or the next game, the effect is clashing with the cause"

 

"Football is a game played with the least docile part of the body: the foot"

 

"It brings a smile to my face knowing that my family and friends are all well. That, and watching Iniesta play."

 

(after being sacked from Real Sociedad) "The human being has the necessity of being respected, we are beggars of respect. But desire has three phases and in all of them we are instatisfied. So, we are f***ed"

 

"I'm not one of those that believe that leadership starts from the dugout. I believe that the manager is like God. Everywhere and nowhere"

 

"Some people talk about anarchic players. Mistake. They just follow a different order. We need to adapt to it"

 

"The opposition is also part of you"

 

There are a bunch more if you feel like it. He is a philosopher-cum-football manager. A legend. Guardiola considers him one of his mentors.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is going on with Xerez?

 

They're certainly not going down with a wimper anymore.

 

Valladolid are awful, but indeed they have been getting results and I think it's more the confidence and sort of siege mentality that they can still pull it off when everybody had them written off a couple months ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good article in The Guardian about the state of our league. I think they hit all the right marks.

 

[quote=

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/mar/28/barcelona-real-madrid-spain]

 

Domination by Barcelona and Real Madrid making Spain the new Scotland

 

La Liga claims to be the best league in the world, but beneath the glitz of the big two and lies a very different picture

 

 

The headline was as alarmist as it was partisan. "The government," declared Spain's best-selling newspaper, "is trying to kill Spanish football." It was November 2009 and the Socialist party prime minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, announced an end to "the Beckham Law". The sports daily Marca, part of the right-leaning El Mundo  group, was furious. Presidents of the country's biggest clubs threatened to lead a strike. At the Spanish League they were talking as if the four horsemen of the apocalypse had reared into view.

 

According to article 93 of law 35, originally introduced by the previous Partido Popular government in 2004, foreign executives earning more than €600,000 (£540,000) a year are taxed at 23%, rather than 43%. In theory, the aim was to encourage talent to come to Spain: in practice, following a modification in 2005, it gave Spanish football clubs, already boosted by the collapse of the pound, a huge advantage. Of the 60 people who qualify for the lower rate of tax, 43 are footballers.

 

Beckham was the first beneficiary of the new rate, hence the informal name. Or rather Real Madrid were, as he had agreed a net salary. Another Englishman, Jermaine Pennant, reveals the practical implications: Real Zaragoza pay him £49,200 a week; an English club would have to pay £80,000 to match his net salary. Cristiano Ronaldo's current salary would cost a Premier League club €5m more than it costs Real Madrid.

 

Now, suddenly, that privilege is being removed. The consequences will be dire. "If the government want a substandard league …" warned the league's vice-president, Javier Tebas.

 

Figures quickly emerged claiming that Spanish football generates 85,000 jobs and turns over €9,000m a year. The real cost to La Liga could be losing its hegemonic position, a "superiority" in which it revels.

 

"Objectively, Spanish football is the best in the world," announced the league's president, José Luis Astiazarán. "Spain won Euro 2008, Barça the European Cup, and our league's the best, superior to England." The arrival of Cristiano Ronaldo, Kaká, Karim Benzema and Zlatan Ibrahimovic last summer provided all the proof he needed. The best players in England, Italy and France had departed for Spain. More than €455m had been spent by Spanish clubs on transfers – a 72% increase, more than any other country. Ever.

 

But, insisted Astiazarán, those days could soon end. Never mind the fact that 43% still puts Spain's tax band below the 50% in the United Kingdom, revoking the Beckham Law will be the demise of the domestic game. "In a few years our league will be average because it won't attract the world's best," complained Tebas. "It is the end of the league of the stars." The law will be repealed from the new tax year but, at least, will not be applied retrospectively, so existing contracts are protected.

 

Tebas may even be right, and not only due to the Beckham Law, because beneath the glistening surface Spanish football is in crisis. According to José María Gay, Spain's leading expert on football finance and an adviser to Uefa: "La Liga is dying." The Osasuna president, Patxi Izco, admits: "I fear a financial meltdown." "Football," insists another director, "is seriously ill."

 

The €455m transfer spend disguises a troubling reality. Last year, despite winning the treble, Barcelona made only €8.8m and have a debt of €350m. Madrid signed €258m worth of players but only after their president, Florentino Pérez, turned to two friends who are both presidents of banks and who loaned Madrid €151.5m.

 

The argument is that their debts are serviceable. In fact, Pérez insists that high expenditure is necessary to generate money and Madrid have become the first club to take income beyond €400m. But doubts remain; costs outstrip income, shirt sales are lower than those of Liverpool and Chelsea; Bernabéu attendances are down 7%; and the debt stands at €683m. Publicly, Pérez insists: "Madrid must always remain a club owned by its members." Privately, the possibility of becoming a plc has been discussed.

 

But would that solve anything? The evidence suggests not. In the early 1990s, a new law obliged every club to become a plc, with four exceptions – Real Madrid, Barcelona, Athletic Bilbao and Osasuna, who were given special exemptions for socio-cultural reasons. Shares were issued and the slate wiped clean. It was supposed to be a panacea. The theory was simple: presidents would be more careful risking their own money. They were not. Often their fans would not let them.

 

"We're operating on a war economy," reveals one director, "but supporters don't see it like that. They just want to win." Jorge Pérez, the secretary of the Spanish Football Federation, admits that one director told him: "If I do a good job economically, we'll go down and they'll kill me." So he spent money he did not have. Only 8% of what football clubs spend on average can be covered by liquid assets.

 

Look back over the clubs who have competed in the Champions League recently and the situation is alarming: Valencia's debt is more than €600m. Like Real Madrid (who sold the their training ground for €447m to the council in 2001, wiping out their €278m debt), a property deal was supposed to be their salvation. However, the market crashed at just the wrong time. Now Valencia have two stadiums – one they cannot sell and another they cannot afford to finish building.

 

According to the third largest shareholder at Atlético Madrid, their debt is above €300m. Villarreal have just failed to pay their players for the first time because the ceramics industry from which their owner, Fernando Roig, makes his money has been hit hard by the crisis. Deportivo La Coruña are more than €120m in debt. Mallorca are desperately seeking a buyer and preparing for administration. Celta Vigo and Real Sociedad have been relegated and, with no parachute payment to break the fall, went into administration. Real Sociedad's president at the time was a certain Astiazarán, now the league's president.

 

"We need to avoid trying to compete with Madrid and Barcelona and sinking ourselves," says Ramón Monchi, sporting director at Sevilla. His club have been successful but there is concern, too: their success has been built on player sales, which requires continued success and a buoyant market. The latter has disappeared; the former depends on European qualification, hence last week's sacking of their coach, Manolo Jiménez.

 

In all, Gay calculates Spanish football's debt to be €3.5bn. The Spanish federation still owe the players' union €6.8m and, according to the former president of the union, Gerardo Movilla, an estimated €100m is still owed to footballers in unpaid wages. The state loses out, too: Atlético owe the tax man €15m; 50% of their transfer income is embargoed.

 

Michel Platini says there are five or six top-flight Spanish clubs in danger. Yet the danger is relative. The irony is that the lack of control also helps to protect the clubs from going out of business – in the short term at least.

 

As Spain's secretary of state for sport, Jaime Lissavetzky, puts it: "We need to be able to hand clubs yellow cards, a warning. But we have no coercive force. It's one thing taking the temperature, it's another handing out medicine." Even administration does not necessarily mean applying the brakes. While it is a last resort it is often a handy one, open to abuse. Unlike in England, there is no footballing penalty for going into administration.

 

The federal nature of the Spanish state, made up of autonomous communities, also offers a crutch upon which to lean. Madrid, Barcelona and Sevilla have all benefited from favourable property deals involving their local councils; Atlético plan to move to Madrid's municipally owned Olympic Stadium, selling the site upon which the Vicente Calderón stands to the council. Many clubs do not have that option: Sporting, Racing, Almería, Getafe, Deportivo, Málaga, and Valladolid all play in municipal stadiums.

 

Valencia have been propped up by Bancaja, their principal creditor, to whom they owe €220m and who, despite the club's mounting debt, backed a share issue to the tune of €95m. "Without them we would have gone down to Second Division B," admits their president, Manolo Llorente. Bancaja are a savings bank and they do not want to upset customers by sending their club to the wall. As one director of another savings bank puts it: "Clubs have an emotional power they use as a kind of blackmail." When Sporting Gijón went into administration, Gijón council bought their "brand image". As one insider puts it: "The council could not let us disappear; Gijón without Sporting is not Gijón."

 

Whether or not clubs go into administration, they can never compete with the big two. Remove Madrid and Barcelona and there was a 40% decrease in summer spending. Only five clubs spent over €5m. During the winter transfer window only three clubs spent anything. But how can you ignore Madrid and Barcelona? They are La Liga. That is the problem.

 

According to reliable statistics Madrid have 13.2m fans while Barcelona have 10.4m. Valencia are third with 2.1m. Nearly two-thirds of all football fans in Spain support one of the big two. And supporters of other clubs almost invariably choose Madrid or Barcelona as a "second" team.

 

The Madrid-Barça dichotomy is self-perpetuating. The media insist they are giving people what they want, that theirs is a business decision. The editor of one newspaper admits: "Every Madrid win is 10,000 more in sales." El País's match reports for Sevilla and Villarreal the day after the clásico contained a total of no words. The director of one television channel insists it would be a "disaster" for the channel if anyone other than Madrid or Barça won the league.

 

The dominance is felt most on TV – and that is the crux of the issue, the precarious foundation upon which Spanish football is built. Unlike elsewhere – and even Italy is going collective – Spanish clubs negotiate individual television deals. "The lack of a centralised deal is the biggest problem we face," Tebas says. The reason is clear. Madrid and Barcelona will earn approximately €120m in rights each year until 2013. Last season's third-placed side, Sevilla earn around €20m; Valencia, currently third, make under €30m – less than Portsmouth. Right throughout the league, the imbalance is extraordinary. Competing is impossible.

 

The problem is the league are powerless to impose a collective deal, although they continue trying. Just as their plans – announced last week – to impose salary cuts and wage limits on clubs can only get the go-ahead if the clubs themselves, and Madrid and Barcelona in particular, agree to them.

 

"It's not normal to have two clubs earning 15 times more," says Villarreal's Roig, "and it's going to be very hard to get the clubs to agree to change now. There's no unity, the league has a very difficult role. I'm not worried about Sheikhs [pumping money into England], I'm worried about our own organisation."

 

An insider at Sevilla adds: "The mentality of every club is always purely selfish and we're not sure that it would be beneficial for us [to campaign for change]. If we push for unity we might lose our position as the third or fourth biggest club: we could get closer to Madrid and Barcelona, but we would also see smaller clubs come closer to us."

 

Perhaps the most fearful remark about La Liga's "big two" problem comes from Sevilla's sporting director, Monchi. "Spain," he says "reminds me of Scotland."

 

In 2008, the then British culture secretary Andy Burham warned of the risk of the Premier League becoming too predictable. "In the US, the most free-market country in the world, they understand that the equal distribution of money creates genuine competition," he said. Spain provides further proof from the other end of the scale. But few see it and few debate it – after all, much of the media lives off the duopoly too.

 

One headline in Spain recently declared: "La Liga becomes the best in Europe." The "evidence" was two-fold: Madrid and Barcelona's place at the head of Deloitte & Touche's rich list; and the "big two" racking up more points than any other team in Europe. A closer read suggests the exact opposite. Madrid and Barcelona were at the top but there was not one other Spanish club among the leading 20 and their points totals – a record at both clubs – suggest that while they are good sides, maybe the teams they are playing against are not. Valencia, third going into this weekend, were 18 points behind. No other major league has such a gap.

 

"We need to recognise that the smaller clubs are necessary for the competition," says Roig. "After all, 15 clásicos at the Bernabéu and 15 at the Camp Nou would be a bit boring wouldn't it?"

 

Some of his counterparts believe it is already too late.

 

Eduardo Bandrés, a former president of Real Zaragoza, says: "This is the dullest league in the world."

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...