Dr Venkman Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 I wouldn't have too many restless nights over it man. haha, i wish it was that easy. seriously though it worries me, he's already brought taylor in a few times this season when he didnt have to, when its been pretty easy to see that our defence works better with willicini. just hate the thought of taylor having to be injured for us to revert back to our very settled, very competent back line, again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 Good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Titus Bramble the second. Needs replacing in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Weep all you want, he's moments away from a rick in every single game. We've got money to spend - it's a big opportunity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Awful today, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Titus Bramble the second. Needs replacing in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Having a terrible game. Can't wait for the kneejerks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Having a terrible game. Can't wait for the kneejerks. Don't need to. Bad day at the office though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Having a terrible game. Can't wait for the kneejerks. Already started. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's been shite today. Everyone else was amazing though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's not a bad player, decent for us. No denying the fact he's been utterly wank today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Sorry, but I've not rated this guy from the beginning, no doubt he's had good games still doesn't deserve to start in a PL side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Sorry, but I've not rated this guy from the beginning, no doubt he's had good games still doesn't deserve to start in a PL side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Sorry, but I've not rated this guy from the beginning, no doubt he's had good games still doesn't deserve to start in a PL side. Agreed. He's wank really Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Sorry, but I've not rated this guy from the beginning, no doubt he's had good games still doesn't deserve to start in a PL side. Agreed. He's wank really Sorry I meant AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 I wonder what your face looked like when you were laughing like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's a reasonable defender, there's no doubt about it. He has more average-to-bad games than he does good ones, though, and is prone to error. We've got a lot of money to spend and it's a huge opportunity to improve on some of our hangers-on in the first team, him being one of them. We won't progress beyond mid-table mediocrity with the likes of Williamson as permanent starters. And i'm not knee-jerking as i've been saying this for weeks/months. In terms of value for money, he's up there with Simpson and Lovenkrands - probably even higher. I like him a lot, and he had a good game last night. Still prone to ricks though, imo, and i'd still be after a centre-back in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 I wonder what your face looked like when you were laughing like that. http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/4279/closeupofamaturemanlook.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's a reasonable defender, there's no doubt about it. He has more average-to-bad games than he does good ones, though, and is prone to error. We've got a lot of money to spend and it's a huge opportunity to improve on some of our hangers-on in the first team, him being one of them. We won't progress beyond mid-table mediocrity with the likes of Williamson as permanent starters. And i'm not knee-jerking as i've been saying this for weeks/months. In terms of value for money, he's up there with Simpson and Lovenkrands - probably even higher. I like him a lot, and he had a good game last night. Still prone to ricks though, imo, and i'd still be after a centre-back in the summer. And I couldn't agree more. Except the quotes parts, I rather have Simpson than Willy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 I wonder what your face looked like when you were laughing like that. http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/4279/closeupofamaturemanlook.jpg Soul-less fuck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's a reasonable defender, there's no doubt about it. He has more average-to-bad games than he does good ones, though, and is prone to error. We've got a lot of money to spend and it's a huge opportunity to improve on some of our hangers-on in the first team, him being one of them. We won't progress beyond mid-table mediocrity with the likes of Williamson as permanent starters. And i'm not knee-jerking as i've been saying this for weeks/months. In terms of value for money, he's up there with Simpson and Lovenkrands - probably even higher. I like him a lot, and he had a good game last night. Still prone to ricks though, imo, and i'd still be after a centre-back in the summer. And I couldn't agree more. You said he was really wank and doesn't deserve to start in a premier league side which isn't really anything like what Yorkie said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's a reasonable defender, there's no doubt about it. He has more average-to-bad games than he does good ones, though, and is prone to error. We've got a lot of money to spend and it's a huge opportunity to improve on some of our hangers-on in the first team, him being one of them. We won't progress beyond mid-table mediocrity with the likes of Williamson as permanent starters. And i'm not knee-jerking as i've been saying this for weeks/months. In terms of value for money, he's up there with Simpson and Lovenkrands - probably even higher. I like him a lot, and he had a good game last night. Still prone to ricks though, imo, and i'd still be after a centre-back in the summer. And I couldn't agree more. You said he was really w*** and doesn't deserve to start in a premier league side which isn't really anything like what Yorkie said. Actually I didn't say that, I said I've never rated him, and he shouldn't be starting for a PL side. Meaning I don't think he's good enough and shouldn't be starting in a team who doesn't want to fight for relegation. Also the 'really wank' part wasn't really serious you see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 He's a reasonable defender, there's no doubt about it. He has more average-to-bad games than he does good ones, though, and is prone to error. We've got a lot of money to spend and it's a huge opportunity to improve on some of our hangers-on in the first team, him being one of them. We won't progress beyond mid-table mediocrity with the likes of Williamson as permanent starters. And i'm not knee-jerking as i've been saying this for weeks/months. In terms of value for money, he's up there with Simpson and Lovenkrands - probably even higher. I like him a lot, and he had a good game last night. Still prone to ricks though, imo, and i'd still be after a centre-back in the summer. And I couldn't agree more. You said he was really w*** and doesn't deserve to start in a premier league side which isn't really anything like what Yorkie said. Actually I didn't say that, I said I've never rated him, and he shouldn't be starting for a PL side. Meaning I don't think he's good enough and shouldn't be starting in a team who doesn't want to fight for relegation. Also the 'really wank' part wasn't really serious you see. You did actually say that though Never mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 1, 2011 Share Posted May 1, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now