Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Danny Simpson our fastest player? Get out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Danny Guthrie is the second fittest player in the league according to those stats and is therefore bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revolution Number 9 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Quickest player. The stats are clearly fabricated crap. My point was merely that Carroll is no slouch. You performed another U-turn on Saylor yet? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1377679/The-fastest-slowest-fittest-players-Premier-League-club.html They must have caught him during last orders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teohgk Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Danny Guthrie is the second fittest player in the league according to those stats and is therefore bollocks. not just bollocks , it's fucking hilarious , which cunts come up with those stats ? Carroll fastest player of Liverpool also Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Quickest player. The stats are clearly fabricated crap. My point was merely that Carroll is no slouch. You performed another U-turn on Saylor yet? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1377679/The-fastest-slowest-fittest-players-Premier-League-club.html Another U-turn? Think you're confusing me with someone else. You'll find my views on Taylor have probably been the most consistent on here over the past 5 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'm not interested in arguing on this thread, just going to put up the stats every month. As of now, stats and ranking are as below (based on soccernet and assuming 45 minutes per half i.e. not including injury time) 1) Ba - 3 goals in 253 minutes = 84.3 minutes per goal 2) Best - 3 goals in 336 minutes = 112 minutes per goal 3) Carroll - 0 goals in 377 minutes Edit: Ba and Best has one assist each What was interesting to me is that I thought Carroll played a lot less and was only playing bits here and there, but he actually played the most minutes and even completed 3 full 90 minutes game. Of course as with stats on strikers, the ranking could easily change in the space of a few weeks never mind a season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I'm surprised at how easy the press have gone on Carroll since his move to Liverpool, 3 goals in 16 appearances and one of those was against Exeter is terrible for a £35 million striker. How much has his value dropped since January? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Quickest player. The stats are clearly fabricated crap. My point was merely that Carroll is no slouch. You performed another U-turn on Saylor yet? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1377679/The-fastest-slowest-fittest-players-Premier-League-club.html No way those numbers are right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 I'm surprised at how easy the press have gone on Carroll since his move to Liverpool, 3 goals in 16 appearances and one of those was against Exeter is terrible for a £35 million striker. How much has his value dropped since January? Probably a lot. The pressure of the price tag could be getting to him..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest magpie99 Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Carrll wasnt even worth half what Livberpool paid for him anyway realistically. In my opinion, I would rather have Best or/and Ba in our current style because Carroll just wouldnt fit in which seems to be proven with every passing well at Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza ladra Posted September 28, 2011 Share Posted September 28, 2011 Carrll wasnt even worth half what Livberpool paid for him anyway realistically. In my opinion, I would rather have Best or/and Ba in our current style because Carroll just wouldnt fit in which seems to be proven with every passing well at Liverpool. Um, no. Carroll in heartbeat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 I'm not interested in arguing on this thread, just going to put up the stats every month. As of now, stats and ranking are as below (based on soccernet and assuming 45 minutes per half i.e. not including injury time) 1) Ba - 3 goals in 253 minutes = 84.3 minutes per goal 2) Best - 3 goals in 336 minutes = 112 minutes per goal 3) Carroll - 0 goals in 377 minutes Edit: Ba and Best has one assist each What was interesting to me is that I thought Carroll played a lot less and was only playing bits here and there, but he actually played the most minutes and even completed 3 full 90 minutes game. Of course as with stats on strikers, the ranking could easily change in the space of a few weeks never mind a season. Update for the month of October (all premier league games played till 31st October): 1) Ba - 8 goals in 553 minutes = 69 minutes per goal 2) Best - 3 goals in 629 minutes = 209.7 minutes per goal 3) Carroll - 2 goals in 567 minutes = 283.5 minutes per goal My observation, is that Carroll is catching on fast to Best as the latter goes through a dry spell in October (though he is still contributing in other ways), will not be surprised if Carroll overtakes Best by end of November. But Ba is certainly on fire and bar some horrible drop in form (or super strike rate from either Best or Carroll) will certainly be the best of the three come end of the season. I'm resetting the poll so that everyone can vote again. I'm voting for Ba. Your thoughts on how the three will stack up? The vote as of end of 25th September (Ba was not included yet as a voting option in September) was: 82.4% voted for Best (75 votes) and 17.6% voted for Carroll (16 votes) The vote as of 2 November was: 57.3% (51 votes) voted for Ba; 36% (32 votes) voted for Best and 6.7% (6 votes) voted for Carroll * usual disclaimer applies i.e. i) states based on soccernet (premier league games only) and ii) minutes played based on assumption of 45 minutes per half. Can I please request one of the mods/admin to change the title to reflect the three way comparison ("Best vs Ba vs Carroll"), thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Can I please request one of the mods/admin to change the title to reflect the three way comparison ("Best vs Ba vs Carroll"), thanks Done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted November 2, 2011 Share Posted November 2, 2011 Can I please request one of the mods/admin to change the title to reflect the three way comparison ("Best vs Ba vs Carroll"), thanks Done. Cheers mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now