Guest neesy111 Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Without the increased TV money we'd be buggered. Could say same for a number of clubs in the premiership imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Probably, aye. Wigan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Probably, aye. Wigan. I'd love to see how much TV money is part of their turnover. Must be over 65% at least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 It's in that piece. 88%. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 It's in that piece. 88%. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 It's in that piece. 88%. Brilliant read as many have already said. I think everyone on N-O should be made to read it and thereafter sit an examination to ensure it has sunk in. Anyone not reaching a set pass mark should be banned indefinitely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocho Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 It's in that piece. 88%. Brilliant read as many have already said. I think everyone on N-O should be made to read it and thereafter sit an examination to ensure it has sunk in. Anyone not reaching a set pass mark should be banned indefinitely. That's Neesy fucked Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBG Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 It's in that piece. 88%. Brilliant read as many have already said. I think everyone on N-O should be made to read it and thereafter sit an examination to ensure it has sunk in. Anyone not reaching a set pass mark should be banned indefinitely. That's Neesy f***ed :lol: 88% though that is ridiculous. Wigan are royally knackered if they go down. They won't do a Pompey, but they won't be darkening the Premier League's door for a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 So the initial figure that came out a couple weeks ago of an operating loss of £3.9m was before player trading? And after player trading was taken into account we had a £30m+ profit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliGupter Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Correct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 In which case, why is player amortisation included in the operating loss, but profit on player sales isn't? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliGupter Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 In which case, why is player amortisation included in the operating loss, but profit on player sales isn't? I think it's because player sales are basically one-off things, operating costs are consistent, something like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Will give the article a proper read later. Interesting that they were keen to publicise how well they're running the club from a financial POV, but were reluctant to really tell the whole story with regards to how much money they made. Although, I suppose, it's also understandable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now