gbandit Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Double No but the first one is a very large no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 29 minutes ago, andycap said: Do you think them could work? No. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 18 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: No. Great insight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 You asked. I mean. Gordon as a RWB? We barely try him right wing and he seems to sulk there when he has played. Often looking reluctant to go down the line. That back 3 in both looks immobile and has a midfielder instead of a wing back on the right. They’re not getting much protection there. Why are we trying to shoehorn Osula into the team? What’s he done that’s so special? He looks like he has potential. But plays at a million miles an hour and a bit of a clown show at times. Do many teams actually play a 3-4-3 set up like that and with two strikers on the pitch? The back 3 and midfield 2 would get torn to pieces no? The second one is better than the first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted Tuesday at 10:07 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:07 I’d like us to be circumspect with the ball. We keep either banging hopeful balls forward with little result of it coming off or players with ability trying to play the Hollywood pass nearly every time. We relentlessly give the ball away often after very few touches. Don't see any benefit to us becoming a ‘possession’ side but being more careful with the ball when a magic through/over the top/around the corner pass has only a 10% of connecting I think would help us a bit. Some patience and just working our way up the pitch, making the other team run around a bit. Move them about, see if their positioning/ marking gets a little loose under pressure. Players like Bruno, Sandro, Isak, Miley, Hall, Trippier and even Schar, Gordon and Botman can see and execute clever passes in and around the opponents box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted Tuesday at 10:35 Share Posted Tuesday at 10:35 Burn echoing what we've all been saying. We're too inconsistent, the goals we concede are too soft, etc. You can guarantee they'll come up with away to flip our form, we just need it to be sooner rather than later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted Tuesday at 18:00 Share Posted Tuesday at 18:00 22 hours ago, Lush Vlad said: You asked. I mean. Gordon as a RWB? We barely try him right wing and he seems to sulk there when he has played. Often looking reluctant to go down the line. That back 3 in both looks immobile and has a midfielder instead of a wing back on the right. They’re not getting much protection there. Why are we trying to shoehorn Osula into the team? What’s he done that’s so special? He looks like he has potential. But plays at a million miles an hour and a bit of a clown show at times. Do many teams actually play a 3-4-3 set up like that and with two strikers on the pitch? The back 3 and midfield 2 would get torn to pieces no? The second one is better than the first. Who else is there Wilson Murphy? I'd take a chance on osula. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted Tuesday at 18:06 Share Posted Tuesday at 18:06 5 minutes ago, andycap said: Who else is there Wilson Murphy? I'd take a chance on osula. Or we could not just cobble together an incredibly disjointed and crap looking formation with two strikers and Osula in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted Tuesday at 19:39 Share Posted Tuesday at 19:39 1 hour ago, Lush Vlad said: Or we could not just cobble together an incredibly disjointed and crap looking formation with two strikers and Osula in? Why not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted Tuesday at 19:48 Share Posted Tuesday at 19:48 Fucking hell. This is hard work. You complained about me just saying ‘no’ when asked if your formations and teams would work. I elaborated further. Yet you’ve not given one reason why these shit formations are going to work and why Osula should be playing. Other than simply saying ‘why not.’ So to parrot you great insight. All the best. I’m out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted Tuesday at 20:00 Share Posted Tuesday at 20:00 9 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: Fucking hell. This is hard work. You complained about me just saying ‘no’ when asked if your formations and teams would work. I elaborated further. Yet you’ve not given one reason why these shit formations are going to work and why Osula should be playing. Other than simply saying ‘why not.’ So to parrot you great insight. All the best. I’m out. Calm down lad. It was just a question about if they'd work and you basically said there shite even though you don't know if they'd work. I think the second formation would work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted Tuesday at 21:33 Share Posted Tuesday at 21:33 Great insight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myleftboot Posted Tuesday at 23:02 Share Posted Tuesday at 23:02 Would like to see a 4-2-3-1. Dubravka tino. Shar. Burn. Hall Joelinton Tonali Murphy. Bruno Gordon Isak could have miley instead of Joelinton or miley in place of Bruno and Bruno instead of Joelinton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now