Guest Grimbo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 After we conceded the second goal, (two goals in 5 minutes) - Roeder disappeared into his dugout. He wasn't seen again for about 5 minutes. Surely at this crucial time he should have been out on the touchline barking instructions or at least trying to gee the players up a bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Yawn...It's an old story. Roeder isn't the one who usually does the barking, it's Pearson. People need to stop trying to pick faults with Roeder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grimbo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 If it was Pearsons job - why wasn't he on the touchline motivating them then. The players were left to sort out the mess themselves. Captain Given was too far away to help too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenton Magpie Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 What's the problem Grimbo? we won didnt we!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Maybe he was trying to write some notes or something,and you cannot just judge his motivational skills by just looking at one match,which of course we won. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grimbo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 What's the problem Grimbo? we won didnt we!? So because we won - we should just gloss over problems? I think when you concede two goals in 5 minutes - somebody on the bench should be out there motivating or at least offerring instructions. Praying seems to have worked on this occasion - but it isn't a strategy I'd like to use on a regular basis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 I thought the crowd played a big part last night in geeing up the players in the start of the second half. That was our best run of play and the martins penalty came soon after... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 I can see what Grimbo means like. In a situation like that when you've gone behind having been in the lead minutes earlier, it would be natural for players to turn to the bench looking for something from their manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhatTheFunk Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 What if he just did not want the players to panic? What if the fact that they did not panic is what kept us from conceding more? I'm not interested in defending him or attacking him. Just stating a possibility Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dasflenst Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Get a life guys. Or a job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grimbo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Get a life guys. Or a job. Is that the best you have to offer? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 We still need to sack Roeder I'm afraid, Reading are hardly a wonder team and they nearly beat us...His sickening nasal whine and mickey mouse match analysis...Clueless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoggeordie Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 They looked fairly motivated to me like in the second half. Not much Roeder could have done in the 3 mins before HT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Saint Andy Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 what good would sacking roeder do? we need a bit of stability imo, give him some time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Invicta_Toon Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 we could win 5-0 and no-one would give any credit to Roeder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 we could win 5-0 and no-one would give any credit to Roeder Could we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grimbo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 what good would sacking roeder do? we need a bit of stability imo, give him some time. we could win 5-0 and no-one would give any credit to Roeder I'm not saying we should sack him or that we shouldn't give him credit for the win. All I'm saying is that when we conceded two goals in 5 minutes he should have been on the touchline, not hiding in the dugout for 5 minutes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Monkey Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Yawn...It's an old story. Roeder isn't the one who usually does the barking, it's Pearson. People need to stop trying to pick faults with Roeder. He's a crap manager, who is nowhere near good enough for NUFC. You can't blame people for not liking him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 he is one of our worst managers in the history of nufc.. lets see how he finish's december,if we are still in the 15-20 area i say we should sack the basterd.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 he is one of our worst managers in the history of nufc.. Completely false. He's had nowhere near the money Souness had and he's only been in charge half a season and already people are writing him off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 he is one of our worst managers in the history of nufc.. lets see how he finish's december,if we are still in the 15-20 area i say we should sack the basterd.. I am playing Devils Advocate here, I actually don't think Roeder is up to the job but say we win all of our games during December and we move to a health position in the league does he still remain one of our worst managers in history? There is no point sacking him right now, if we are going to have to sack him do it so that a new manager has a transfer window to get new faces in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TampaToon Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 roeder's teams have reclaimed several games in the 2nd half that looked like lost causes in the 1st....even when the result hasn't been 3 points or a draw, i think his team's ability to come out firing after halftime has to say something about his motivational skills. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 roeder's teams have reclaimed several games in the 2nd half that looked like lost causes in the 1st....even when the result hasn't been 3 points or a draw, i think his team's ability to come out firing after halftime has to say something about his motivational skills. We were having the exact opposite of that when we were having that losing streak - all guns ablaze in the first half, gutless in the second. I am playing Devils Advocate here, I actually don't think Roeder is up to the job but say we win all of our games during December and we move to a health position in the league does he still remain one of our worst managers in history? If he gets the club to 7th or 8th in the league, he'll be better than souness at least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TrEe Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 Newcastle manager Glenn Roeder has claimed that midfielder Emre was left "irate" at comments made towards him by members of the Reading coaching staff as the players came off the pitch at half-time during the two side's Premiership match at St. James' Park on Wednesday. The Turkey international drove in a late winner to seal a 3-2 victory for the Magpies, and Roeder insisted that it was an appropriate answer to the earlier incident. "I was unhappy with some of the coaching staff of Reading before half-time, when they made comments to Emre which upset him. "He was particularly irate at half-time as he came off, and it was only justice that it was Emre who sent Reading packing with no points. "I could not repeat what was said, but it was not very nice. There were comments directed at Emre before half-time which were not necessary. "Emre had every right to be upset. Thankfully, half-time came and we could calm him down and he went out and played his part in what turned out to be a terrific victory against a team which had just won its last four games and certainly do not lose leads very often. "It was really fitting that Emre scored a goal which was not just a tap-in, it was a special goal." The win lifted Newcastle out of the relegation zone and up to 15th in the Premiership. Thats why he went out before half-time... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Magnetic North Posted December 7, 2006 Share Posted December 7, 2006 IMO Roeder's at his most influential with the fans behind him. Groaning will only have an adverse effect on the man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now