Sean Longstaff

[Rod]

1 minute ago, Ellis H said:

I’d keep him as well in part because we’re at the stage of needing to add players, not lose them. One or two injuries and he’s important again.
 

It wasn’t too long ago he was a regular in a team that got us 4th and then didn’t look out of place at all in the champions league. His main problem is that he got replaced by one of the best players in the world and therefore looks a worse player than he actually was in comparison.

Thank you.

[Rod]

5 minutes ago, JT24 said:

You can’t understand the negative posts? Have you watched him play football at any point in the last year?
 

He’s very clearly not good enough for where the club want to get too. Recoup some money for him before he walks away for free.  

The same arseh....... fans that were calling for Big Dan Burn (England International) to be sold for glue are the same aresholes calling to get rid of Sean Longstaff.  You were one of them weren't you?

[Displayname]

3 minutes ago, Rod said:

The same arseh....... fans that were calling for Big Dan Burn (England International) to be sold for glue are the same aresholes calling to get rid of Sean Longstaff.  You were one of them weren't you?

Dont really remember people calling for him to be sold, just not used at LB.

[Rod]

Just now, Displayname said:

Dont really remember people calling for him to be sold, just not used at LB.

Fuck off. The abuse Dan Burn got on here was horrendous.

[JT24]

6 minutes ago, Rod said:

The same arseh....... fans that were calling for Big Dan Burn (England International) to be sold for glue are the same aresholes calling to get rid of Sean Longstaff.  You were one of them weren't you?

Aye, those are the same thing.
 

Had a beer have we, Rod?

[TheBrownBottle]

Haven’t checked, but would a sale of Longstaff leave us short of homegrown players for the CL?

 

He’s a solid PL midfielder - he’ll attract interest - but it would be a problem if we’re left short in Europe.  He’s a better player than he’s often given credit for. 

[Rod]

9 minutes ago, JT24 said:

Aye, those are the same thing.
 

Had a beer have we, Rod?

When you're beaten in an argument you always resort to the snide comments of "had a beer have we". If you know this site then you should know that I only drink Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc. The thread is about Sean Longstaff. You think he's shit and I think we should keep him. Let others on here contribute.

However, don't be so shallow as to call someone drunk when they have a different opinion.

 

 

Edited 10 hours ago by Rod

[The Butcher]

Good enough for a team that finished 4th, but not good enough for a team that finished 5th.

 

 

 

 

Edited 10 hours ago by The Butcher

[SteV]

8 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Haven’t checked, but would a sale of Longstaff leave us short of homegrown players for the CL?

 

He’s a solid PL midfielder - he’ll attract interest - but it would be a problem if we’re left short in Europe.  He’s a better player than he’s often given credit for. 

Aye, it would, but we’d only be one player worse off.

 

Depending on who/how many we buy, it’s probably the difference between being allowed to have someone like Kraft registered or not.

[JT24]

5 minutes ago, Rod said:

When you're beaten in an argument you always resort to the snide comments of "had a beer have we". If you know this site then you should know that I only drink Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc. The thread is about Sean Longstaff. You think he's shit and I think we should keep him. Let others on here contribute.

However, don't be so shallow as to call someone drunk when they have a different opinion.

 

 

 

You’re right, let’s keep Longstaff for another year. Certainly would be great business if he contributed the same amount as this year and walked away on a free transfer next summer. 

[TheBrownBottle]

3 minutes ago, SteV said:

Aye, it would, but we’d only be one player worse off.

 

Depending on who/how many we buy, it’s probably the difference between being allowed to have someone like Kraft registered or not.

Yeah, that’s true.  No issue with the club selling anyone and it feels like we’ve outgrown the lad tbh.  

[lovejoy]

17 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Haven’t checked, but would a sale of Longstaff leave us short of homegrown players for the CL?

 

He’s a solid PL midfielder - he’ll attract interest - but it would be a problem if we’re left short in Europe.  He’s a better player than he’s often given credit for. 

I wouldn’t sell him, personally.

[Ellis H]

Most would have sold Murphy for pennies last Summer. 

[toon25]

2 hours ago, Rod said:

I can't understand the negative posts on here regarding Sean. I personally would keep him. He's no Lionel Messi but he can not half get up and down that pitch. He has great stamina and can actually pop up for a goal or two. Keep him.

 

Zero goals and zero assists last season tbf.

 

 

Edited 8 hours ago by toon25

[Pandamninator]

3 hours ago, toon25 said:

 

Zero goals and zero assists last season tbf.

 

 

 

Only started 8 games 

[Groundhog63]

7 hours ago, Ellis H said:

I’d keep him as well in part because we’re at the stage of needing to add players, not lose them. One or two injuries and he’s important again.
 

It wasn’t too long ago he was a regular in a team that got us 4th and then didn’t look out of place at all in the champions league. His main problem is that he got replaced by one of the best players in the world and therefore looks a worse player than he actually was in comparison.

👏👏👏

[Shearergol]

1 hour ago, Pandamninator said:

Only started 8 games 

Sounds like a useful player to keep then