Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said:

Well I care, and it would seem big clubs care as they tend to avoid it as much as possible.

 

Isak being 'the difference' in a title race next season is just strawman nonsense, it's about strengthening a rival for the next 5 or so years when our aim is to beat them, it's not controversial or anything.


It seems that you just don’t accept the premise that we could buy a collection of players for 150m that would be more valuable to us than Isak alone, in which case I can’t really argue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldtype said:


if the assumption is that we are so incompetently run that we will never buy good players again then this all goes out the window and we might as well fold the club.

or a little bit of incompetence with a lot of shitty luck because of the cartel clubs. I think the striker search is not nearly as much down to incompetence as not filling in positions lie CB and CM yet is. It's been really shitty luck as much or more than poor execution due to weakened infrastructure, etc. But here we are, after 9th choice players. That alone should probably increase Isak's value to us, since we can't seem to adequately fill his position at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“We don’t want to sell to domestic rivals” is just wholesale emotional nonsense. Fine, quote them an inflated fee, but if your domestic rival is willing to pay it, why on earth would you stop them from making that mistake.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldtype said:

“We don’t want to sell to domestic rivals” is just wholesale emotional nonsense. Fine, quote them an inflated fee, but if your domestic rival is willing to pay it, why on earth would you stop them from making that mistake.

seriously, man. That's just a lame response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vinny Green Balls said:

seriously, man. That's just a lame response.


It’s fine and natural if fans feel that way. But if the people making financial decisions at the club do, then they should be sacked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oldtype said:


It seems that you just don’t accept the premise that we could buy a collection of players for 150m that would be more valuable to us than Isak alone, in which case I can’t really argue.

Literally told you that my issue is selling to a domestic rival. Being obtuse and strawmanning, Same old OT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

Literally told you that my issue is selling to a domestic rival. Being obtuse and strawmanning, Same old OT.


I said this a few posts ago, but if the players we buy with the money improve us more than Isak strengthens Liverpool, then we’re not actually strengthening a domestic rival.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oldtype said:


I said this a few posts ago, but if the players we buy with the money improve us more than Isak strengthens Liverpool, then we’re not actually strengthening a domestic rival.

:lol: Okay. Well we can all be the judge on that one. 

 

If I want hot water I don't turn the cold on then the hot on a little bit more and make do with warm water, I just turn the hot tap on.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldtype said:


I said this a few posts ago, but if the players we buy with the money improve us more than Isak strengthens Liverpool, then we’re not actually strengthening a domestic rival.

 

4 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

The proceeds are 100m 35is going on a 29j year old back up. 

 

So we have 65m left after that then the money is gone. 

 

It's not at all transformative. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, oldtype said:


If Wissa can be even just 70% of Isak, is it that hard to imagine that him and another signing could contribute more to the team overall than Isak alone would?

Only one will play at a time. 

 

If football was a game where each team started with 22 players priced would be much lower. 

 

I think one of the points worthy of consideration for selling him is how the money can be used but we need two strikers in an inflated market the timing for all of this is horrible. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, r0cafella said:

Only one will play at a time.

 

If football was a game where each team started with 22 players priced would be much lower. 

 

I think one of the points worthy of consideration for selling him is how the money can be used but we need two strikers in an inflated market the timing for all of this is horrible. 


Why, we’re allowed to use the money to strengthen in positions other than striker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oldtype said:

 

I’m repeating myself, but why would we want to deter them if they’re meeting or exceeding our asking price. We want to induce them to do that, if anything.

 

I would say price is just one of the variables that are involved in selling a player.

 

-Timing

-PSR situation 

-Market conditions

-Buying club

-Optics

 

For Example, if Isak told us in May, this is my last season. I'd like to leave. Barcelona told us they'd be willing to match our asking price. We had time to, and managed to get Delap and Ekitike early doors, no drama etc. 

 

That would be a completely different scenario to the one were facing now

We may recieve 150 mil in both instances, but they are 2 completely different outcomes for the football club on several levels.

 

People say playing tough doesn't mean anything. Look at this board when anyone mentions going after Geuhi again or trying for Eze. First comment is they dont want to deal with that cunt Parrish again.

 

That should be us. It should be absolute hell to take a player off us we dont want to sell. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Palestoon said:

 

I would say price is just one of the variables that are involved in selling a player.

 

-Timing

-PSR situation 

-Market conditions

-Buying club

-Optics

 

For Example, if Isak told us in May, this is my last season. I'd like to leave. Barcelona told us they'd be willing to match our asking price. We had time to, and managed to get Delap and Ekitike early doors, no drama etc. 

 

That would be a completely different scenario to the one were facing now

We may recieve 150 mil in both instances, but they are 2 completely different outcomes for the football club on several levels.

 

People say playing tough doesn't mean anything. Look at this board when anyone mentions going after Geuhi again or trying for Eze. First comment is they dont want to deal with that cunt Parrish again.

 

That should be us. It should be absolute hell to take a player off us we dont want to sell. 


It’s true that there are many variables involved in selling a player, but all of that is ultimately factored into the asking price. And having to pay the third largest transfer fee in the history of the world qualifies as “absolute hell” in my book.
 

(Although I don’t really care about the optics or the buying club at all).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...