Ranking our Squad - 1: Dubravka

[midds]

He's a D but he's only going one way from here and it's not up

[Mike]

CE smushed together. He was damn good at one point, and has been when called upon this year. But he's also in his mid thirties.

[TheBrownBottle]

D on a good day, E on a bad day.

 

Anyone giving any member of our team an A other than Isak has B&W specs on, mind.

2 hours ago, Shearergol said:

Nothing wrong with E, mind

 

[Heron]

He's a C for me. He isn't gonna tear it up anywhere but he's reliable enough like.

[Shearergol]

36 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

D on a good day, E on a bad day.

 

Anyone giving any member of our team an A other than Isak has B&W specs on, mind.

Nothing wrong with E, mind

 

I reckon Tonali gets in most teams tbh 

[Joe1984]

2 hours ago, astraguy said:

pathetic  thread , Players view this forum and we're just entering the nitty gittty end of the season then we get this shit

 

 

 

Which players view this forum?

 

I voted C. Solid enough player Dubz.

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Joe1984

[TheBrownBottle]

24 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

I reckon Tonali gets in most teams tbh 

All opinion, but not for me at the moment 

[La Parka]

He's a c. Would be fine at any other club looking to survive all the way up to brink of Europe imo.

[Shak]

Stunned that there are so many saying C, a team full of players of his level would be absolutely fucked in the PL.

 

Went for E, was stuck between that and D but ultimately I feel like I can make four fairly distinct tiers above Dubravka so went for the harsher option. Pleased for him that he's had a nice run recently but he's just such a poor shot stopper that I'll never feel comfortable with him starting games for us even as a backup.

[Super Duper Branko Strupar]

Used to be a C, dropped to an E, has very recently performed as a D. Not sure that can last particularly long at 36. 

[Super Duper Branko Strupar]

Actually tbf in his past few games where he's done well and not really put a foot wrong, if he was a new signing and 27 you'd say he was a C. To be fair to his recent performances. But the wider context exists and it has to be taken in to account.