kirkwdavis2001 Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Just been on TalkSPORT, surely thats a joke?!?!?!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Pauline or Mark? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobby Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 no chance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC06 Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 please NO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirkwdavis2001 Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Pauline or Mark? Pauline would be preferable but they actual said "Robbie Fowler" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mickcee Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 606 gossip: More players have been spotted at rival training grounds. Morten Gamst Pedersen is at Liverpool's Melwood complex. Harry Kewell will be going the other way according to PoolRoss. And Babel is at Newcastle. Assuming that's the Amsterdam forward Ryan and not something to do with Brad Pitt's film being on at the Tyneside Cinema. So we getting both? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Brad Pitt will only sign for a CL side Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Spectrum Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 I like Robbie Fowler...by the end of his time at City I thought he had adapted really well to losing his pace and was a real class act. He had gotten past his reccuring injuries and was really making us tick - he was the only real forward we had in the team that Pearce inherited and took flying up the table when we missed out on Europe with the last minute penalty save. Good player, I would have the '04/05 Fowler back at City in a shot. BUT, he was, and is, really on his last legs in terms of match fitness. Given the ammount he has played since he left here a year ago (ie, fuck all) he would be a pointless short term signing. Every time he missed a game or two for City, he would come back and play like he'd never seen a ball before...really I think he needs constant games to play well nowadays to keep on top of his fitness/sharpness. If you did sign him, he would be nigh on useless for 3 months, then be really good for the last few games of the season. I don't see the point of it...I'd be extremely suprised if this wasn't a load of made-up bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest smoggeordie Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Would be an excellent addition on loan, a possibility I mentioned many weeks ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooneyToonArmy Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 no thanks, he has no appetite for the game any more IMO other than when he has a Liverpool shirt on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenton Magpie Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Wouldnt be that bad, he may be slow but he can still find the back of the net! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Prefer Andy Cole over Fowler - still has appetite/goals in him despite being past it and can actually run. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vicente_14 Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Prefer Andy Cole over Fowler - still has appetite/goals in him despite being past it and can actually run. Agree, and it looks as if he's leaving Pompey on loan today Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 no thanks, he has no appetite for the game any more IMO other than when he has a Liverpool shirt on This. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rafa Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 no thanks, he has no appetite for the game any more IMO other than when he has a Liverpool shirt on aye, true that. And tbh, even for Liverpool, he STILL can't get properly fit! I just think that is how he is, he just can't get sharp, cant keep the weight off. And he's never been a good trainer! For us he is very much last choice striker, look at last night, he didn't come on till injury time. And sometimes he doesn't even get into the match day squad. But still, if we where to lose one striker now to injury, we'd need a 4th choice striker, so I can't see us even considering letting him go at the last minute on deadline day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie2000 Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 no thanks, he has no appetite for the game any more IMO other than when he has a Liverpool shirt on aye, true that. And tbh, even for Liverpool, he STILL can't get properly fit! I just think that is how he is, he just can't get sharp, cant keep the weight off. And he's never been a good trainer! For us he is very much last choice striker, look at last night, he didn't come on till injury time. And sometimes he doesn't even get into the match day squad. But still, if we where to lose one striker now to injury, we'd need a 4th choice striker, so I can't see us even considering letting him go at the last minute on deadline day. Thank God for that, I certainly don't want him at Newcastle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Darth Toon Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Would be the complete antithesis of everything Roeder had said he's looking for - under 30, something to prove, right attitude, plenty of hunger etc etc. So, every possibility of it happening then! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moe-Ali Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 Roeder will not make a good move, like gooch, and follow it up with a bad one like fowler. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eyeball_tickler Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobby Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. hopefully they would never get in our team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eyeball_tickler Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. hopefully they would never get in our team if we did our job in the market well, we wouldnt be linked with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobby Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. hopefully they would never get in our team if we did our job in the market well, we wouldnt be linked with them. if we did our job on the pitch well, we wouldnt be linked with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eyeball_tickler Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. hopefully they would never get in our team if we did our job in the market well, we wouldnt be linked with them. if we did our job on the pitch well, we wouldnt be linked with them. buying good players = improved performance. usually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobby Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. hopefully they would never get in our team if we did our job in the market well, we wouldnt be linked with them. if we did our job on the pitch well, we wouldnt be linked with them. buying good players = improved performance. usually. buying shit players = worse performance. usually. Cole and Fowler. not good enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eyeball_tickler Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 i said this weeks ago and got laughed at. cole and fowler on loan would be better than anyone else we can realistically get. hopefully they would never get in our team if we did our job in the market well, we wouldnt be linked with them. if we did our job on the pitch well, we wouldnt be linked with them. buying good players = improved performance. usually. buying shit players = worse performance. usually. Cole and Fowler. not good enough. thats why we get them on loan for 4 months. an injury to martins and who do we have? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now