Mr. Snrub Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Robinson was about 3 yards off his line when he saved it anyway. Deserved the rebound going in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 bullshit ref decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Hmm, 2 hours ago called they want their goal back 2 years ago called they want their joke back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Get in! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 It's 2-2 shut up Nyt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 blooooooooooooooody hell i wasn't expecting that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 http://openstudio.media.mit.edu/art/renderer/92d597180b3ef35d010b71e691b601ac/550x550 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 wow another goal from a bad decision by the ref :rolleyes:. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Noo. I want Spurs to go through, the more easy teams in the quarters the better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Yeah I mean playing over the added time on Sunday was a disgrace Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 2-2? it was 0-0 when i turned off?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!?!??!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Shouldn't have turned off at half time then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 :'( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Game, set and match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Keane 3-2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Spurs through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 GET IN! (I've got a bet on Spurs) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Yeah I mean playing over the added time on Sunday was a disgrace If you cant work out that the extra injury time was to west spams advantage then you are a lost soul. KEANEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TAKE THAT YOU BRAGA CHEATS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Am I on the ship of...LOST SOULS? It was to their advantage but surely once it had been cleared that was full time, or was "last attack" abolished some time ago? Anyway in my opinion he was right to play it on, but to the letter of the law a referee's decision favoured you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon55544 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Yeah I mean playing over the added time on Sunday was a disgrace If you cant work out that the extra injury time was to west spams advantage then you are a lost soul. KEANEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TAKE THAT YOU BRAGA CHEATS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Am I on the ship of...LOST SOULS? It was to their advantage but surely once it had been cleared that was full time, or was "last attack" abolished some time ago? Anyway in my opinion he was right to play it on, but to the letter of the law a referee's decision favoured you. well if you actually watched the highlights again you will se that West ham were attacking untill near the 95th minute mark. Now considering the referee added only 4 minutes, can you please tell me why west sham were allowed to take a corner after the 4 minutes were up?. Your chatting shite and the ref's decision favoured the spammers at the time but we ended up the lucky ones. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Morph Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Am I on the ship of...LOST SOULS? It was to their advantage but surely once it had been cleared that was full time, or was "last attack" abolished some time ago? Anyway in my opinion he was right to play it on, but to the letter of the law a referee's decision favoured you. well if you actually watched the highlights again you will se that West ham were attacking untill near the 95th minute mark. Now considering the referee added only 4 minutes, can you please tell me why west sham were allowed to take a corner after the 4 minutes were up?. Your chatting s**** and the ref's decision favoured the spammers at the time but we ended up the lucky ones. Does anyone actually give a shit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest optimistic nit Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 kingdawsons right to be fair to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 I love how you've ignored the fact that I agreed with you that it was right to be played on. All I'm saying is a few years ago there was a rule called last attack, and thus when West Ham got the corner it was LAST ATTACK and so as soon as they lost the ball that would have been it. However: a) I don't know if that rule still exists and b) It would have been ridiculous if the ref had blown for full time when you had 4 on 1 in your favour, like I stated quite a while ago. Please learn to read. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now