Stevie Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Monte Carlo or bustMay 11 2007 By Alan Oliver, The Evening Chronicle United may or may not like The Chronicle revealing their trip to the principality, but our take is that the supporters will be encouraged that they are taking action to appoint a new manager and strengthen their squad sooner rather than latter. Maybe I'm wrong here, but I'm 99% sure I'm not regarding the bit in bold. That is in response to comments on this thread. When has he EVER, put "United may not like what the Chronicle are reporting" PMSL. So blatantly in response to this. As if they give a f*** whether a delegation is in Monaco to speak to a third party gets reported or not. What difference does it make? Alan we all know you do as your told, such a pathetic attempt to suggest your anything but a yes man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 We're not supposed to paste full articles from there Stevie, so i've edited some out of your post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I'm certainly encouraged that they've took a gruelling trip to that dump called Monaco, must be hell for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 We're not supposed to paste full articles from there Stevie, so i've edited some out of your post. Since when? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Since they complained about it. Ask Phil, i'm not going through this on his behalf. There was a thread on it informing people: http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php?topic=39829.0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 The last sentence of the article : "And reports today that United are hanging back on Allardyce before seeing if Alan Shearer is interested in replacing Glenn Roeder are simply not correct." Surely thats a missed opportunity to keep up the "wide of the mark" count!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 To be fair to Dave, he's not a copyright lawyer. All he knows is that the site has been asked not to post full copies of Chronicle articles for obvious reasons (by posting the full article here we are depriving their site of hits). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? It's their article, they are entitled to say where it is used. They have complained to us for posting them in full which is fair enough. I can't fucking believe i'm having all this bollocks yet again. If people want the forum to go, then carry on by all means. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheOrder Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? It's their article, they are entitled to say where it is used. They have complained to us for posting them in full which is fair enough. I can't f****** believe i'm having all this bollocks yet again. If people want the forum to go, then carry on by all means. Yes it is their article but once it is published they have no grounds to do anything if you source their work. Don't be such fucking wimps and give in to them ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Whatever mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheOrder Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Greg has a point like, they can't do fuck all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Greg, I can see where you're coming from, I said the same myself, but if they're complaining, it gives us a much easier life to just do what they ask. Phil owns and pays for this site so it's up to neither me nor Dave to say what happens with regards stuff like this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? It's their article, they are entitled to say where it is used. They have complained to us for posting them in full which is fair enough. I can't f****** believe i'm having all this bollocks yet again. If people want the forum to go, then carry on by all means. Yes it is their article but once it is published they have no grounds to do anything if you source their work. Don't be such fucking wimps and give in to them ffs. Jesus Christ man, can you not see their reasoning behind not posting their articles on here. They want people to visit their site, not read them on a third party site. It's a perfectly reasonable request. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Why do they have to be able to do something about it? They've made a request and we're agreeing to it. I guess it's too hard for people to click on a link to see the full story. Not going to argue any further about this, take it up with those that own the site. i.e not me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 FIGHT THE POWER! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheOrder Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 FIGHT THE POWER! I'll be writing to my MP immediately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? It's their article, they are entitled to say where it is used. They have complained to us for posting them in full which is fair enough. I can't f****** believe i'm having all this bollocks yet again. If people want the forum to go, then carry on by all means. Yes it is their article but once it is published they have no grounds to do anything if you source their work. Don't be such fucking wimps and give in to them ffs. Calm down dear Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? It's their article, they are entitled to say where it is used. They have complained to us for posting them in full which is fair enough. I can't f****** believe i'm having all this bollocks yet again. If people want the forum to go, then carry on by all means. Yes it is their article but once it is published they have no grounds to do anything if you source their work. Don't be such fucking wimps and give in to them ffs. Fuck off like. Why do you want to risk the site for not just clicking the link?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevie Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 FORGET ABOUT ALL THIS PISH 4FS AND CONCENTRATE ON MY ONE MAN CAMPAIGN TO EITHER GET THE CHRONICLE TO GIVE OLIVER'S JOB TO ME, OR SOME CUNT ELSE! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheOrder Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 *Sigh* It's not 'giving in', we are breeching copyright by posting it. So does this mean that no articles that appear in any media outlet can be posted in full on this forum? How is it breaking copyright if you source the article? It's their article, they are entitled to say where it is used. They have complained to us for posting them in full which is fair enough. I can't f****** believe i'm having all this bollocks yet again. If people want the forum to go, then carry on by all means. Yes it is their article but once it is published they have no grounds to do anything if you source their work. Don't be such fucking wimps and give in to them ffs. Fuck off like. Why do you want to risk the site for not just clicking the link?! Maybe this forum isn't as important to some people, than it is to most people. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 FORGET ABOUT ALL THIS PISH 4FS AND CONCENTRATE ON MY ONE MAN CAMPAIGN TO EITHER GET THE CHRONICLE TO GIVE OLIVER'S JOB TO ME, OR SOME CUNT ELSE! Stevie, I would pay a lot of money to see you get Oliver's job. Imagine the Chronicle billboards around town. "BIG MATCH PREVIEW: NUFC V THEM SPURS C*NTS" "WALLPUSHERS MATCH REPORT" "TRANSFER LATEST: NUFC LINE UP SOME SPANISH C*NT" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now