Jump to content

Blades: We aren't playing in the Football League.......(until dispute is sorted)


Recommended Posts

they played rubbish all season and were incredibly boring, it is their fault that they went down. It's too late now for anything else. Would be so much easier if the Premier league gave punishment immediately.

 

You don't see liverpool fans complaining that AC milan shoudn't have been in the CL, even though they probably shouldn't have been.

 

Is this entire post all supposed to be sarcastic?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest optimistic nit

afc wimbledon got deducted 3 points (reduced on appeal from 18) for fielding a player who didn't obtain international clearence before signing, and were knocked out of the cup. thats not half as serious as what west ham did, but they are not facing any points deduction are they? they essentially will gain around 35million from this, by staying in the league.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest geordiebaz

I m sorry but Sheff United are starting to p me off with this now, fact of matter is if they had been better over 38 games they wouldn't of been ain a relegation battle

Link to post
Share on other sites

I m sorry but Sheff United are starting to p me off with this now, fact of matter is if they had been better over 38 games they wouldn't of been ain a relegation battle

 

Your missing the point. West Ham would of been Relegated if they didnt play Tevez, Tevez goals kept them up so if i was a Sheffield United fan i'd be very pissed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they know it was dodgy back in September?

 

Well the whole world was speculating at the time that it was. There's no way West Ham United could have attracted both of them without either a) going bankrupt or b) it not being legit. We knew of the company's ownership of both of the players from the offset.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they know it was dodgy back in September?

 

Well the whole world was speculating at the time that it was. There's no way West Ham United could have attracted both of them without either a) going bankrupt or b) it not being legit. We knew of the company's ownership of both of the players from the offset.

 

Fine. But who's 'we'? If you mean the whole world then they're bang to rights. New owners or not - they've broken the rules and should be punished accordingly. Not with a poxy fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest smoggeordie

Watch the Premier League revoke West Ham's £5.5m fine and give them a 2 point deduction.

 

 

or 6 points...effective from next season :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sheffield United have my symapthy on this. Under normal circumstances, they didn't do enough to stay up, but another club has cheated and broken the rules, and yet is staying up at their expense. Ten years ago, Middlesbrough had points deducted, resulting in relegation for a stupid, but lesser offence. West Ham know they have done wrong and said that they would accept any decision. If they felt that they had already been fairly punished, they would not come out with such a statement, they would be fighting tooth and nail, shouting about how they've already been punished. They know they've got off very lightly and should have got a hell of a lot more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they know it was dodgy back in September?

 

Well the whole world was speculating at the time that it was. There's no way West Ham United could have attracted both of them without either a) going bankrupt or b) it not being legit. We knew of the company's ownership of both of the players from the offset.

 

Fine. But who's 'we'? If you mean the whole world then they're bang to rights. New owners or not - they've broken the rules and should be punished accordingly. Not with a poxy fine.

 

But it's too little, too late. Fair enough they should have been punished for it with a points deduction but that deduction should have came in September, October, November, heck even Christmas time.

 

Sheffield United can't blame their entire failings on what happened on the last day of the Premiership season. If Tevez hadn't have scored those goals, Sheffield United wouldn't have complained. Notice how Wigan aren't speaking out that much? because they didn't go down. Fact is, they should have spoken out when Tevez was not making an impact on the team, not only because he started to.

 

They're simply looking for an excuse for why they went down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they know it was dodgy back in September?

 

Well the whole world was speculating at the time that it was. There's no way West Ham United could have attracted both of them without either a) going bankrupt or b) it not being legit. We knew of the company's ownership of both of the players from the offset.

 

Fine. But who's 'we'? If you mean the whole world then they're bang to rights. New owners or not - they've broken the rules and should be punished accordingly. Not with a poxy fine.

 

But it's too little, too late. Fair enough they should have been punished for it with a points deduction but that deduction should have came in September, October, November, heck even Christmas time.

 

Sheffield United can't blame their entire failings on what happened on the last day of the Premiership season. If Tevez hadn't have scored those goals, Sheffield United wouldn't have complained. Notice how Wigan aren't speaking out that much? because they didn't go down. Fact is, they should have spoken out when Tevez was not making an impact on the team, not only because he started to.

 

They're simply looking for an excuse for why they went down.

 

With all due respect - "If Tevez hadn't scored those goals"...West Ham wouldn't have got as many points and gone down. He played when he shouldn't have. They won points they weren't entitled to. They should have had points docked but they didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they know it was dodgy back in September?

 

Well the whole world was speculating at the time that it was. There's no way West Ham United could have attracted both of them without either a) going bankrupt or b) it not being legit. We knew of the company's ownership of both of the players from the offset.

 

Fine. But who's 'we'? If you mean the whole world then they're bang to rights. New owners or not - they've broken the rules and should be punished accordingly. Not with a poxy fine.

 

But it's too little, too late. Fair enough they should have been punished for it with a points deduction but that deduction should have came in September, October, November, heck even Christmas time.

 

Sheffield United can't blame their entire failings on what happened on the last day of the Premiership season. If Tevez hadn't have scored those goals, Sheffield United wouldn't have complained. Notice how Wigan aren't speaking out that much? because they didn't go down. Fact is, they should have spoken out when Tevez was not making an impact on the team, not only because he started to.

 

They're simply looking for an excuse for why they went down.

 

With all due respect - "If Tevez hadn't scored those goals"...West Ham wouldn't have got as many points and gone down. He played when he shouldn't have. They won points they weren't entitled to. They should have had points docked but they didn't.

 

I'm not disputing that they shouldn't have been deducted points, but it should have happened months ago. It's too late now, Sheff Utd are clutching at straws.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they know it was dodgy back in September?

 

Well the whole world was speculating at the time that it was. There's no way West Ham United could have attracted both of them without either a) going bankrupt or b) it not being legit. We knew of the company's ownership of both of the players from the offset.

 

Fine. But who's 'we'? If you mean the whole world then they're bang to rights. New owners or not - they've broken the rules and should be punished accordingly. Not with a poxy fine.

 

But it's too little, too late. Fair enough they should have been punished for it with a points deduction but that deduction should have came in September, October, November, heck even Christmas time.

 

Sheffield United can't blame their entire failings on what happened on the last day of the Premiership season. If Tevez hadn't have scored those goals, Sheffield United wouldn't have complained. Notice how Wigan aren't speaking out that much? because they didn't go down. Fact is, they should have spoken out when Tevez was not making an impact on the team, not only because he started to.

 

They're simply looking for an excuse for why they went down.

 

With all due respect - "If Tevez hadn't scored those goals"...West Ham wouldn't have got as many points and gone down. He played when he shouldn't have. They won points they weren't entitled to. They should have had points docked but they didn't.

 

I'm not disputing that they shouldn't have been deducted points, but it should have happened months ago. It's too late now, Sheff Utd are clutching at straws.

 

In which case you'd accept that they have a legitimate grievance. They aren't "clutching at straws", they're fucking bang on correct. West Ham garnered points by playing a player they didn't own. FACT. They admitted it. They should have been stripped of every one of those points.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they played rubbish all season and were incredibly boring, it is their fault that they went down. It's too late now for anything else. Would be so much easier if the Premier league gave punishment immediately.

 

You don't see liverpool fans complaining that AC milan shoudn't have been in the CL, even though they probably shouldn't have been.

 

Didnt stop the Italian FA from stripping Juventus of their title.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NUFCnutter

If it was us instead of Sheffield United would you hear us complaining. DAMN RIGHT WE WOULD. Wet Spam should not have been allowed to play Tevez while there was any doubt about his eligibility, and I can't see how he can be deemed as inelligable by the FA and yet they are allowed to fax paperwork to them just before the Man U game to allow him to play. That must constitute a new transfer window? Why were all teams not allowed to sign another player just before their final game?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fact is, back in August, Sheff Utd would have set themselves a target of finishing 17th in the table, and because one team playing an ineligible player, this was denied them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

West Ham had 2 players playing for them who's registration was suspect. The Premier League agreed it was suspect because they fined them £5.5m

Teves then had his registration legitemised by the FA/Prem at a time that was OUTSIDE the transfer window which makes his signing illegal.

Therin lies Sheff U's legal challenge - on top of WHU playing dual owned players which was the original offence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Teazy

If any team is in  trouble come next March, they can sign new players and take the 5.5 million hit to save them losing 60 million in the prem. It is not right and the prem league have set a very dangerous precedence. West Ham should be docked the points, the message would be clear and everyone can move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...